Based on history why is China dominating the USA in the current era?
What mistakes did previous US presidents make?
>>2379444
>dominating the USA in the current era
You're really going to need to justify that statement m8, China isn't dominating the US in any area really.
If you mean 'they're competitive economically', they're still far from "dominating" and it's mostly due to having 1.3 billion people and a lack of environmental regulations vs. 300 million with extensive regulations.
Please stop making China posts on /his/, I am Chinese and you guys are really wrong about most things. We don't want to dominate US, if US can let us do more things we want, we'll be happy. Nobody needs to dominate, we can work together. China can't even dominate US if it wanted to.
Although Zhang Yuqi has a beautiful body. Good taste, anon.
>>2379461
So why is the US so terrified of China's complete dominance on the world stage?
https://www.c-span.org/presidentsurvey2017/?page=overall
I fugged up the title
>>2379252
I would replace Kennedy with Jackson.
>>2379252
good list except truman
hey folks, i need to pick a topic for my history paper (US history only) and i want something fun and edgy. unfortunately my request for "bush did 9/11", was rejected by my professor
>>2379168
How about "Bush was blackmailed into saying Osama bin Laden did 9/11 by the current Shadow Government revealing it knew the nuclear launch codes?"
civil rights was a plot by internationalist.
Could someone please explain to me, what did this man actually believe?
I've read the majority of his book, it started becoming too repetitive so I stopped in the last chapter, still, I can't understand what he actually believed or tried to say.
So humans are naturally egoistic or not? If no, then I get him, but he wrote a few times that people do work and want to work for thier interests, what if spooks are in ones interest? And to what is ones interest anyways?
If I am a commie who gets a thrill from being part of an ideological movement and working towards a goal, am I not working for my interest? I'm getting a thrill out of it, a sense of purpose, aren't these things in my interest?
And if not, if my interest is to rape and steal and get away with it, is he basically an advocate of psychopathy?
Is his philosophy more expansive than just "fuck over the system whenever you can get away with it"? Can one not be an egoist and a good person at the same time? Just from the good feeling that you get out of being nice to others?
Don't read this garbage
Whether humans are egoistic or not is irrelevant
interest is irrelevant until it's defined
"good" means nothing until you define it
I'm glad you're reading philosophy anon, but guys like this operate within a system of assumptions either made by their cultural background (shudder) or some previous philosopher (I've heard this guy draws on Nietzsche and possibly Hegel)
Read the Nicomachean Ethics by Aristotle before any of this shit. The translation you want is W. D. Ross (Oxford uses it). You don't have to agree with Aristotle, but you do need to know what a fully constructed ethics looks like. This guy is a fucking clown, but I don't blame you for reading him: the spook thing sounds really insightful until you get used to this shit.
>>2379222
I'll take "I've never red Stirner" for 10$, tyvm.
>(I've heard this guy draws on Nietzsche and possibly Hegel)
>I've never actually bothered to study the man's works, so I am going to dismiss the collective of his ideas and philosophy on the basis of my personal ignorance
You are the cancer killing this place.
>>2379232
HAHA lets not care about anything but our own material well being haha even laws are stupid haha
Is scientific extremism/idolization THE MOST anti-intellectual thing you can do? Famous pop scientists love to take jabs at everything that isn't the perfect and almighty SCIENCE. I'm just reading a book about psychology and in the first chapter it completely diminishes things like the tarot and religion because they do not accommodate scientific method and principles, as if those aren't far better methods to know one self than psychology.
>pic of a young healthy looking female implying fertility to provoke procreation instincts from millions of years of evolution taking place in the form of mere chemical processes in your brain, immediately calling your attention among the various tame historical pictures of other threads, rising the chance of glancing at the first words of this post and generate interest, thus making this thread susceptible for more attention and survivalist in the cyber entanglements of data of the internet
>>2378718
>something, something
Raging boner
>something, something
Good thread OP!
Give me one good reason why I should believe that some old cunt dealing me cards says things about me or my future.
I agree.
Was Buddha white? After all, high caste folk in his times were probably rather pure Aryans relatively untainted by Dravidian blood.
>>2378709
He was, he's commonly described as having blue eyes.
>>2378723
>curly hair
Nobody haze me for this. After giving it much thought, the original Aryans who came down from Ukraine probably looked closes to modern day slavs. So yes.
Why did the greeks like blonde hair so much? hardly any of them even had/have it
It was associated with heavenly and deity qualities
probably why it was spread as a trait in the first place
Everybody likes blonde hair. Especially on women.
>>2378610
>Short hair
Who was in the wrong here?
Gayreeks.
>>2377353
The Athenians of course. They wanted to create their own empire.
>>2377373
t. Thucydides
I see your still butthurt over being exiled for incompetence.
What would the Spanish conquest of the Americas be like if it was conducted by women conquistadors instead of men? Would they still have managed it?
You already know the answer.
>>2375710
>ywn be repeatedly raped by brutal hordes of sweaty, buxom Conquistadoras who literally suck the sperm out of you with their improbably tight, soaking wet steamy pussies and give birth to a new mestizo race
Ready to throw it all in, boys.
>>2375718
It really depends on what kind women are leading them. It could go either way I believe.
How did women become convinced that a career was more important than a family?
let me guess what you want to hear: jews, liberals, sluts, or whatever it is you people are now blaming for being a loser
>Put masculine values/traits such as ambition, worth ethic, respect, honor, reason, and competition on a pedestal
>Pidgeonhole women into the nurturing, caregiver/teacher role and deprive them of the means to be independent
>Suddenly women are able to join the workforce, more careers open up for them, and they are able to chase whatever dream job they wish
It's really not a mystery.
>>2374747
>Put masculine values/traits such as ambition, worth ethic, respect, honor, reason, and competition on a pedestal
But women in the workforce don't actually display any of those traits...
>Muslims cant fig-
>>2372348
>Muslims are wea-
>>2372348
Muslims can't fig- what?
Muslims can't figure out how to stop being barbaric savages?
>>2372349
>Muslims Always lose wa-
What is the meaning of life?
Why do you think it has to have a meaning.
The purpose of all life is to multiply itself, the organisms who didn't have that goal died out.
>>2372156
/thread
Why is Japan and Japanese culture attract to Westerners and be seen in a more positive light compared to its neighbors like Korea and China?
sea empire, probably.
>>2351564
Cooler. Less poverty and autism.
>>2351564
anime
Why are cultures based on patrilocal residence patterns and the forging of convergent ties between men (China, India, Vietnam, Korea, Japan, Turkey, Sahelian empires, Fulani states, Somali sultanates) so successful, while cultures based on matrilocal residence patterns and the forging of cross-cutting ties between men (Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Spain, Portugal, cultures of the matrilineal belt of Africa) are so shitty and unsuccessful?
>Pic related
>>2381343
>Spain and Portugal are unsuccessful
>Somalia and Indian are successful
Yep, one of these threads again.
woah /pol/tard has no idea what he's talking about
>>2381343
what do you mean?
how does countries you mentioned are matriarchal?
Even southeast asian countries like Thailand and Malaysia are better than Saheli, Fulani, Somali or whatever you call it
What is this picture telling us, /his/
to be grateful
Great butthurt at a culture utterly superiour in the way it mediates and stays afloat on modern times tearing down what you have and humilating it.
Usually by your youth doing it voluntary.
>>2380832
Freedom wins