What are the differences between philosophy and religion?
Where does Buddhism fall?
>>2400830
depends
Vajrayana/theravada is religious
Other mahayana is philosophical
Chan/zen is highly practical
Religion = dogma
Philosophy = critically constructed body of knowledge
>>2400868
philosophies can be dogmatic
I would say that religion necessarily has to have an object of
>worship
>The Jews are a race of Ethiopian origin
What did he mean by this? Hmmm....
>>2399999
What did you mean by those numbers?
>>2399999
nice numbers. And stormfags will claim that ancient Ethiopians were white because they believe only whites can produce good content and have produced content
>>2399999
Black Israelites are right all along
Do you consider yourself to be sorted out?
>>2399617
"looking with lustful intent"
>>2399617
>There is nothing about it that is good.
>He goes to the wrong sites.
>>2399617
Define "sorted out" because I don't give a fuck what your meme man on the internet has to say about shit.
The generel sentiment in media, politics and academia is yes.
What does /his/ say?
No, I shouldn't feel guilty for a crime I had no hand in. Just as every German living today shouldn't have guilt for the holocaust, no European should feel guilt for what their ancestors might've done.
>>2399002
No it isn't
>>2399002
I don't think you'll find a single person who is actually feeling the effects of racism ect. who wants white people to be guilty
Well?
>>2396815
Is that land they claimed or effectively controlled, because their is a difference
>>2396815
I did for half a year in primary school, was pretty fucking boring.
>>2396815
I have seen this exact picture in at least two different high school history books
What /his/ thinks about Argentina history as country
>gibe back relatives
1919 worst year of my life
>>2405268
Get rid of that ugly sun, Jesus
Was Hegel right?
No.
>>2404686
What quarrels do you have with him?
be more specific
Cool guy.
Showed the Eternal Anglo who's boss.
Also, should add this - would the world be a better place if he won?
I think napleon is a pretty cool guy. Eh conquers europe and doesn’t afraid of anything.
International capital of the world: New York or London?
>>2404237
New York is literally thousands of miles from anywhere else of any relevance. So obviously London town.
Damn it. Wrong board.
why are you even asking
New York
So anybody here that take their language cues from Britain, see the word dodgy as meaning:
1. Inclined to dodge
2.
evasively tricky:
a dodgy manner of dealing with people.
3.
Chiefly British. risky; hazardous; chancy.
(definitions from dictionary.com)
Do you Americans also see the word 'DODGY to mean the same? And if you do, you instantly interpret the word as this, or do you have to think about it (IE common usage or not).
Just curious really.
Evasive, but in a social way, trying to avoid a subject or get out of admitting something.
Like "Sketchy", a suspicious person.
>>2404189
Yes, but it's not a term in widespread use.
>It is also unsatisfactory to some that the elective franchise is not given to the colored man. I would myself prefer that it were now conferred on the very intelligent, and on those who serve our cause as soldiers.
>(AUTISTIC SCREECHING)
>>2404159
Lincoln was personally a racist by modern standards, sure. He still led the country to restore the Union and crush the institution of slavery. What's your point?
>If the British Army landed in Europe, I'd get the Belgian police to arrest them.
>>2404036
>If the British Army landed in Europe, I'd get the Belgian police to arrest them.
b-but Germans heff no humor
> I have full sympathy with their(Poles) condition,
>>2404036
>BEF BTFO's the German army at Mons
WIE
WUZ
RÖMISCH
UND
SCHITE
>>2403958
>schite
Fünf!
>>2404687
Schiete secht Fiete un schett in de Büx!
>Hallo Sepp!
>>2403958
>Erinnerung daran, dass Hannover 1866 an der Seite Österreichs stand.
Was Italy treated unfairly after the end of WWI?
They were treated generously.
Yugoslavia should have gotten the entire light green area.
You think the Americans, bongs and frogs wanted another rival?
>>2403955
If any country can be considered to have definitively won WWI, it was Italy. They got more clay than they deserved, clear defensible borders, and their main geopolitical foe, Austria-Hungary, ceased to exist, despite the fact that their contribution to victory was minimal. The fact that they actually got butthurt about muh mutilated victory is pure autism. France had way more justification to claim their victory was mutilated.
Is this the biggest LARPer in history?
Was he larping a surrender monke lol
Why the duck did France get their own occupation zone after the war ended? They didn't do shit
>>2403551
They needed France on good terms with the rest of the Western Allies to avoid a possible communist government in France. Absolutely snubbing them out of the Peace agreements would've almost guaranteed a backlash in the form of France voting in a communist government.
and they very nearly did in 1946, with the communists getting 25% of the vote to the winner's 28%.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_legislative_election,_June_1946
Same story with Italy as well. The Italians got extremely lenient terms in the peace agreement considering Germany and Japan's fate, avoiding military occupation altogether and no division of their homeland in an attempt to prevent Italy from electing a communist government as well, and again, it came close.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_general_election,_1953
Outright punishing your own allies would have been a stupid decision consider the political climate after WW2, and the West needed as many allies as they could get after half of the continent was gobbled up by the Soviets after the war.