Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 1619. page

File: Flag_of_Independent_State_of_Croatia.svg.png (49KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 1200x800px

What can /his/ tell me about Croatia in ww2 and the "Independent state of Croatia"

File: image.jpg (50KB, 720x393px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 720x393px

>he thinks hitler isn't Walt Disney

File: IMG_9348.jpg (83KB, 497x333px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 497x333px

Why did South Korea repeatedly massacre so many of its citizens?

File: IMG_0528.jpg (883KB, 1066x1500px) Image search: [Google]

883KB, 1066x1500px

/his/ I need help,currently writing a book on pseudoscience and am writing about psychology,who else beside Freud talked about dream interpretation.
Sources are appreciated.
Also general psychology discussion.

File: Less meaning.jpg (63KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 850x400px

What did he mean by this?

File: cleopatra.png (366KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 400x400px

My knowledge of Egyptian history is limited to ancient history and at some point becoming the Islamic shithole it is today. Could some history buffs fill me in on what happened in the gap between these two points?

File: St-Joseph-who-was.jpg (30KB, 200x333px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 200x333px

>my wife's son

File: 1487810101557.jpg (85KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1024x768px

I have a question pertaining Kant's transcendental philosophy. This question can be applied to both the pure intuitions of space an time and the categories of pure understanding, but I will articulate my doubt dealing only with the pure intuitions of space and time (for the sake of simplicity).

Now, for Kant, space and time are not properties of the world, according to him, our cognitive apparatus applies the spatial/temporal structure to the world. The reason for this is that we cannot derive space and time from our experience of the world, since we need space and time to even be able experience the world. Space and time are the necessary conditions for sensibility.

So, to say again, why we can't derive space and time from experience? Because we need them to even be able to experience. Now my question is: why Kant infers from this that is our cognitive apparatus aplying space and time to the world? Why does he exclude the possibility that the world has this spatial and temporal structure and for that reason we're able to experience it? Certainly from the fact that space and time are necessary conditions for sensibility we cannot infer that the world doesn't have a spatial/temporal structure. So why Kant infers from that that we are the ones applying space and time to the world?

Thanks for your attention.

File: image.jpg (31KB, 640x421px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 640x421px

Why were the Greeks and the Egyptians the only people who successfully fought against the Achaemenids? Were they particularly superior as soldiers?

File: Yakov_Mikhailovich_Yurovsky_1918.jpg (46KB, 230x240px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 230x240px

You have been visited by Based Yakov the Romanov Childer Brain Spiller.

Full communism and butthurt monarchists will come to you. But only if you post "THANK YOU YAKOV" in this thread.

File: ff.jpg (429KB, 1192x861px) Image search: [Google]

429KB, 1192x861px

I wonder.

What if Germany would had lost the Battle of France?

Would our timeline equivalents(/his/ shitposters) saying how it was impossible to Germany to conquer France like we do with the Soviet Union?

File: 1484949934412.png (26KB, 397x262px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 397x262px

ITT historical feels.

Confederate general Joe Johnston's death is mine:

>After the surrender, Sherman issued ten days' rations to the hungry Confederate soldiers, as well as horses and mules for them to "insure a crop." He also ordered distribution of corn, meal, and flour to civilians throughout the South. This was an act of generosity that Johnston would never forget; he wrote to Sherman that his attitude "reconciles me to what I have previously regarded as the misfortune of my life, that of having you to encounter in the field."
>Johnston, like Lee, never forgot the magnanimity of the man to whom he surrendered, and would not allow an unkind word to be said about Sherman in his presence. Sherman and Johnston corresponded frequently and they met for friendly dinners in Washington whenever Johnston traveled there.
>When Sherman died, Johnston served as an honorary pallbearer at his funeral; during the procession in New York City on February 19, 1891, he kept his hat off as a sign of respect in the cold, rainy weather. Someone with concern for the old general's health asked him to put on his hat, to which Johnston replied "If I were in his place and he were standing here in mine, he would not put on his hat." He caught a cold that day, which developed into pneumonia, and he died several weeks later in Washington, D.C.

File: download (1).jpg (7KB, 196x258px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 196x258px

There are mathematical geniuses, musical geniuses, literary geniuses, and I suppose even philosophical geniuses. What makes some a genius? Is there any actual reality to being a genius, or is it something society made up to give to people who show a high talent in a certain domain?

File: the eternal latin strikes again.jpg (70KB, 618x401px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 618x401px

Would they have been better off if they never called the crusades?

File: ssemoji.png (80KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1500x1500px

can anybody tell me the ranks of the ss in order, i cant seem to find them online anywhere