Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 1494. page

False.

Your post is so filled with holes and fallacies I don't even know where to begin.

>>2520761

Show me when the scientific community accepted the Exodus happened.

1. Science and religion are not mutually exclusive. You can be both a scientist and a theist. Infact, the founders of modern science were Christians.

2. There is no "rejection" of religion by scientists. Science is the study of the natural world (things we observe in this physical reality). Religion seeks to explain why and what the purpose of life is.

3. "Actual scientists" - what do you mean by this? Christian scientists are not real? Creationist scientists are not real? Because there are plenty of them. You can't just cherry pick. A scientist is a scientist regardless of his/her personal beliefs.

4. The guys in your pic are not scientists, they are philosophers of 'New Atheism', the snotty, smug, rebellious God-haters that believe in pop-science and put forth a straw man image of religion. The actual four horsemen of atheism are: Freud, Darwin, Nietzsche and Marx.

5. "The scientific community rejects every notable religion's claims" - that is a gigantic false generalization. Blatant falsehood. Be specific, what religion are you talking about? Which scientists agree? Which don't agree?

6. You are a proponent of Atheistic Naturalism/Materialism, Humanism and Evolutionism. This is your worldview and your presuppositions. You are religious as well, and don't even realize it.

No I'm pretty sure you exist.

>>2520691
Your statement doesn't really change anything.

>>2520687
are you really a nihilist if you care about what we think?

File: IMG_3646.jpg (81KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 640x1136px

How will we ever know?

File: IMG_3645.png (569KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

569KB, 640x1136px

Without seeing his genitals, how do we know he was really male?

File: IMG_3661.png (783KB, 1136x640px) Image search: [Google]

783KB, 1136x640px

I have a pretty good idea what was creating that bulge, but you never know...

File: ww2.png (16KB, 321x278px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 321x278px

I thought Azerbaijan was a Russian colony what did it do in ww1?

The allies also had significantly higher casualties in ww2 also

>>2520531
thats only because Russia is shit tho

>>2520524
>central powers lost ww1
Yeah, that's what happened

>>2520466
By who? Military?

If you are not man enough, you get what you deserve.

I smell a spook

>>2520466
>Ugly balding lanklet
Why is it always the ones wit the shitty genes?

File: 2017-03-17.png (305KB, 1247x565px) Image search: [Google]

305KB, 1247x565px

fascists BTFO

File: mussi.png (282KB, 1796x741px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 1796x741px

>>2520439
Sure about that?

File: eternally btfo.png (661KB, 1416x556px) Image search: [Google]

661KB, 1416x556px

>
>
>

The divorce(s) that saved Britain.

File: Big Guy.png (3MB, 1000x1503px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1000x1503px

>>2520399
you're a big guy

First bishop to legalize divorce gets to stay on my church.

>>2520368
>>gives Donitz all the funds he needs to build an effective navy

This is just a catch-all dumb idea

Germany could never invade Britain.

>>2520368
>British sovereignty over Britain
Why leave your enemy beat and not crippled? Better to blow his knees out.

>>2520368

He DID concentrate on the RAF, the reason he stopped doing this and shifted to terror bombing was because the RAF proved to be indestructible. Britain was winning the Battle of Britain even before the nazis shifted to terror bombing.

>>2520334
It's the best country in that region.

>>2520336
This. Jordan has definitely been a lot more successful than its neighbors

>>2520336
>>2520344
>Jordan
>Better and more successful than Israel
>Better and more successful than Saudi Arabia

File: d7b60eb1153af6bea251c3f4500c5eb9.jpg (107KB, 564x797px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 564x797px

>Stop in the name of Pompei Mangus!

Vigiles were the LEOs of Rome. Originally given only a fire safety prevention mandate, they graduate to keeping social order in an increasingly metropolitan city.

>>2520289

In their broadest sense of "people who enforce the rules" then no, except perhaps the smallest most primitive clan-based societies.

>>2520289
native americans probably, although thir societies had a few people.

>>2520258
Dmitry Puchkov. He invites historians and some other figures for historical discussions

>in b4 alex jones, stephen molyneux or jordan peterson

>>2520258
https://www.youtube.com/user/academyofideas/videos
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSMG40p6XHFTeXv5noF6Wdw/videos (yeah, sargon of mossad, his side channel where he reads stuff unabridged is good)
https://www.youtube.com/user/CaspianReport/videos (a bit on the geopolitical side of things, but has some history vids)
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHdluULl5c7bilx1x1TGzJQ/videos
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCv_vLHiWVBh_FR9vbeuiY-A/videos
https://www.youtube.com/user/BlastfromthePast/videos
https://www.youtube.com/user/TheGreatWar/videos

Can we make a rule against stupid questions?

>>2520246
Because the American government doesn't give a rats ass about them.

>>2520246
God, Finland is so sexy in this map. The only issue is mutilated Greece.
Also, I'm not really a fan of big Germanys.

>>2520151

To what end? Waging a ruinous war that destroyed our own Empire?

>>2520160
anglo treachery knows no bounds

File: IMG_3646.jpg (81KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 640x1136px

No, it was all because of his penis size and balls.

Didn't really pursue political power as much as loot

A terrorist is someone who uses terror (fear) as a means of submitting others to their agenda. Vikings just appeared and took shit. Although the modern interpretation of terrorist is someone I don't like with a gun, so...

>>2520097
Because they were only defending their own culture you dumb piece of shit.

>>2520093

It was literally the whole point of national socialism tho.

They probably would've invaded Germany.

What if I farted in your face