https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Bill_of_Rights
What the fuck was his problem?
>>2525917
emulating the policies of der fuhrer had gotten him that far, why stop now
>>2525917
>His remedy was to declare an "economic bill of rights" to guarantee eight specific rights:Employment, Food, clothing, and leisure withenough income to support them, Farmers' rights to a fair income, Freedom fromunfair competitionandmonopolies,Housing,Medical care,Social security,Education.
Literally, what kind of retarded classcuck would be against this?
>>2525938
Because it's idealistic socialism that wouldn't work in the real world.
>objective evil doesn't exi-
>slave labor is obsolete in an industrial eco-
>>2525849
The good guys won the wa-
>>2525859
Slave labor is never obsolete. Its just that they want people who are able to buy consumer goods.
I have never seen a thread about organised crime on /his
So let's chat about it. Most formidable gangs? Coolest outfits? Biggest fights or operation?
Which Mafia was the biggest/most influential?
I find pic related very interesting. Irish Mob were a bizarre lot.
>inb4 phoneposting
Apologies, I'm at work
>>2525761
The Clintons.
>>2525761
Some of it is going to have to be rooted in your definitions. I mean, by definition, a pirate group is pretty much an organized crime syndicate if they start charging fees to operate in their water instead of getting their take from out and out banditry, which several of the larger pirate fleets did.
But can you count something like Koxinga's group? He had hundreds of thousands of men, but he was essentially a privateer of the southern Ming remnant that operated with an extreme amount of independence. Does that make him a criminal in the classic sense or a sailor operating under a nasty set of rules of war?
Did Jesus exist?
I think he was real, but his actions are probably mixed with Middle Eastern mythology.
The parallels to Egyptian, etc mythology are unreal
>>2525705
Someone named jesus excsited, who knows beyond that. When the christians came to rome they found Jesuses execution order and treated it like an holy item.
1. Yes.
2. Zeitgeist has been debunked years ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFI6m6Icav4
Nobody knows. I personally think he didn't. Or at least absolutely nothing like the Bible says he was/maybe multiple people/myth or a mix of all of them. And good luck distinguishing between fact and fiction thousands of years later.
What was the edgiest military unit in all of human history?
Hard mode: no Dirlewanger
>>2525680
>Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists
Hard mode should be no WW2
>>2525680
Literally anything that involved Ukrainians in WW2. The biggest massacres in the East (Babi Yar, Khatyn, Wolyn etc) were their doing.
>>2525716
Non-collaborating Ukies were not that bad desu
Why did anyone let him touch their kids? There is no doubt in my mind that he was gay. The only reason anyone might have trouble with that fact is if they haven't read or don't understand Romans 1, or choose not to believe. Why would anyone let him be around any child, boy or girl?
>It's yet ANOTHER Hitler thread
Why does he like to hide his crotch with little boys? That makes him look really really bad!!!
He was gayer than gay!?!
Is this his best shit?
>>2525576
Would hit
genealogy of morals.
thus spoke zarathustra.
ecce homo.
Yes.
Does "khan" mean king, or warlord?
As in, does it refer to the guy who leads people into war, or the overall peace time autocrat?
>>2525524
king
>>2525524
King
A warlord king.
>Germans
>humans
they did some really bad fakes
>>2525415
you would do the same given an appropriate environment
>>2525415
Nice photoshop skillz comrade Pidarov.
>ITT: People who got so far and tried so hard, but in the end it didn't even matter
>>2525397
>"Communism leads to the emancipation of workers and peasants!!"
>"Then why did millions of peasants, including child labourers, starve to death during forced collectivisation?"
>"Th-they were all Kulaks!! Famine was unavoidable, you reactionary bourgeoisie fascist!"
pic related: children forced to dig out frozen potatoes
Is there a good argument against dialectical materialism's claim that communism is basically inevitable?
>>2525301
Why would you try to refute a claim that is based on zero evidence? Not worth it.
>>2525331
>no solid evidence to the existence or nonexistence of God
>people tip their fedoras anyway
>we must free europe from nazi oppression
>yeah lets give half of europe to the soviets
>>2525176
The soviets did the vast majority of dying against Nazis so they deserved the lands they got.
>>2525184
>we suck at war and deserve to be rewarded for it
>>2525176
The Soviets deserved it having fought the hardest and killing the vast majority of the Wehrmacht.
>monarchism wor-
ks.
>During the reign of Charles II, Spanish power and prestige declined at an accelerated pace, that started in the last years of Count-Duke of Olivares' prime ministership in the 1640s. The economy, on the whole, was depressed between 1650 and 1700, with low productivity, famines, and epidemics.[13] Spain's economy (especially in Castile) crumbled. This was partially due to plague outbreaks, for example during 1676–1685, and partially due to the huge casualties caused by almost continuous warfare. The period 1677–1686 was the lowest point; there was famine, natural disasters, and economic chaos. Emigration to the New World increased; with the population of Spain decreasing by nearly two million people during the 17th century: nearly 1.25 million from plagues, and 300,000 from the expulsion of the Moriscos. Spanish territory shrank with the loss to France of some territories in the Spanish Netherlands.[1]
>/his/ will defend this
>>2525123
You can't really pin it on a retard.
Hey, uh, Islam's a religion of peace, n'stuff. Trust me
>>2525070
But that's Ali
You aren't suggested that a religion would make claims that aren't true, are you?
>>2525074
Not this one bro
I'm not disputing the general idea of evolution that mutations result in selective pressure and adaptation, resulting in development of species.
What is a blatant lie is that evolution is a conclusive theory that fully explains where humans come from.
It does not.
Scientists and anti-theists like Dawkins who shill for evolution neglect to mention that the "missing link", or the creature supposed to be the father of both hominids (us) and other primates such as our closest supposed relatives the chimpanzee, has not been found after decades of intense research and exploration. It does not exist. By all metrics it should have been found but it does not exist.
The idea that humans are "descended from apes" has yet to proven, we have not found the link between hominids and the rest of the primates. There's a massive gap.
The theory and process of evolution as we currently know it is not sufficient to explain the development of a being with the intelligence of a human. Otherwise many other species types would have eventually evolved to a similar level of intelligence. Why are their no intelligent reptiles or intelligent anything else to the same level of humans that they can create civilisation?
The uniqueness and exceptionality of humans defies our understanding of evolution. We should not exist, but we do, and we have yet to find our predecessor.
>>2525066
tons of "missing links" exist. it's just that by the nature of evolution being continuous change there is an endless number of "missing links" which will never be fully discovered unless you uncover every single organism to ever exist. evolution isn't "conclusive" if your standard goes to the level of how can we be sure that our senses ever reflect reality or whether reality exists, but it is conclusive empirically
>lack of evidence is evidence of lack
ur shit rolf
>>2525081
>but it is conclusive empirically
>>inducting