Can you name one multicultural society that flourished prior to 1900?
From what I can see, "diversity" is actually bad and creates civil unrest, or at the very least turmoil and apathy. Meanwhile the 5th columnists excite and promote take over of government and revolts.
>bonus points: prove eskimoes killed vikings.
Rome, the United States, etc.
All large empires are multicultural
During the days of the Roman Empire, were the Romans aware that they became a monarchy with Kings and Nobles n shiet, and not a classical republic no longer?
Looking at the Roman Empire, the senate was still around, and the title of its ruler is really that of a supreme military commander whose imperium extends to all of the territories held by Rome.
I'm just wondering whether or not the Romans didn't see any changes to their society at all during the switch to Empire. Like how could a Republican state convince itself to have a Monarch even?
>>2586385
>implying republicans hate nobility
Yes that's why NEW MAN wasn't a title
>>2586385
Also the emperors held multiple offices so only near the end is it solely imperator which means emperor solely
Are you saying they did in fact not know that they wuz kangz?
http://arzamas.academy/materials/1269
>Political life was exceedingly tumultuous in 1917. Some parties and groups wanted to give all the land to the peasants and all the factories to the workers; others thirsted to fight in the war to a final victory; still others dreamed of demolishing the government to its very foundations. In order to find out which of these groups you might have been a part of, you can use the Political Compass of the Revolution. Its horizontal axis refers to economic preferences, from the extreme left (socialists) to the extreme right (liberals). The vertical axis maps out data about political inclinations, from democratic to authoritarian. We have laid out the ten basic political forces in the Revolution along these axes (see below). In order to find out where you would have fallen, you need to take our quiz and evaluate 27 assertions about the most pressing problems in September 1917, after the Kornilov Affair had failed, but before the October Revolution took place. You should not use the Compass to define your modern preferences. The situations of the different parties is tightly connected to September 1917: the position of many – in particular the Bolsheviks – later shifted on certain issues, even so far as to land on the directly opposite pole. Therefore, the proximity of any party or group to another on the Compass does not necessarily mean that they were allies in the political struggle: a group’s position on the graph is merely the sum of their ideological positions.
I'm almost sure to be liquidated.
>>2586229
I'll join you in the mass graves.
Do you think the Tower of Pisa and the Sphinx will collapse in our lifetime?
>>2586108
Much more likely to be blown up by Achmed and company
>>2586115
Keep in mind the Sphinx is filled with sewage and the Tower of Pisa tilted more in like 20 years than the previous 200.
>>2586118
Is it really filled with sewage?
Why do so many Turks deny the Armenian Genocide?
>>2586027
It's common in every strain of nationalism:
Deny all the violence inherent to nationalism while openly advocating to do it again. Turks are just the least subtle about it because they harbor nuclear-level butthurt
>>2586049
But why do they need to deny it?
>>2586146
Because if you dont, you end up like us
Philosophy was always here to help us find The Truth but now we live in the post-truth world and our search is basically over. Is there any reason to even bother with philosophy anymore?
As a person who lives in a post truth world I categorically deny and reject your claim that we live in a post truth world.
>>2586013
C-can you do that
>>2586080
If it was true that he couldn't, that truth would be obsolete.
What was the comfiest historical place and time to live?
Modern day Switzerland
We're all cursed for not being born Swiss.
>i will never live in early 20th century Paris
Place: anywhere away from the city.
Time: anytime where information isnt so easily spread.
Do you guys collect any ancient coins or artifacts?
Had a 800 year old Jade ring. Family heirloom. Sold it once my father died.
have an 300 year old Irish bible strange because i am a Romanian.
>>2586014
wtf is wrong with you
>the south began the war to preserve the institution of slavery
>the north fought the war to preserve the union
Is this something we can all agree on?
>>2585884
>the south began the war to preserve the Confederation
>the Founders started the war to preserve the institution of not paying taxes
>the Crown fought the war to preserve the Kingdom
Is this something we can all agree on?
>>2585884
>the south wanted out because of economic interests
>the north began the war because of economic interests
what does /his/ think of the ancient Germanic people?
They're cool.
I was told that the Inca empire was a communist utopia, but then I read this.
>In the ancient empire of the Incas, sex was a heavily regulated industry. The sun-king Atahualpa kept fifteen hundred women in each of many “houses of virgins” throughout his kingdom. They were selected for their beauty and were rarely chosen after the age of eight—to ensure their virginity. But they did not all remain virgins for long: They were the emperor’s concubines. Beneath him, each rank of society afforded a harem of a particular legal size. Great lords had harems of more than seven hundred women. “Principal persons” were allowed fifty women; leaders of vassal nations, thirty; heads of provinces of 100,000 people, twenty; leaders of 1,000 people, fifteen; administrators of 500 people, twelve; governors of 100 people, eight; petty chiefs over 50 men, seven; chiefs of 10 men, five; chiefs of 5 men, three. That left precious few for the average male Indian whose enforced near-celibacy must have driven him to desperate acts, a fact attested to by the severity of the penalties that followed any cuckolding of his seniors. If a man violated one of Atahualpa’s women, he, his wife, his children, his relatives, his servants, his fellow villagers, and all his lamas would be put to death, the village would be destroyed, and the site strewn with stones.
>As a result, Atahualpa and his nobles had, shall we say, a majority holding in the paternity of the next generation. They systematically dispossessed less privileged men of their genetic share of posterity. Many of the Inca people were the children of powerful men.
Does this mean it is true? That leftism inevitably results in cuckoldry on a massive scale?
>>2585801
Society needs incentives.
>>2585801
Considering that Atahualpa was only emperor for a few months before he got asSpain'd, and he only got to that position after winning a civil war he had against his brother, that passage you posted kind of smells like some fanfiction bullshit.
Also
>and all his llamas
Kek
How developed could the Americas and Africa have been if they had contact with each other?
>Africa
Richest kingdoms
Full-fledged metallurgy
Useful animals
>Americas
Written language
Mathematics
Efficient and productive crops
Only Mayans had a fully-developed written language; Aztecs only developed it partially and Incas had no written language.
It would be interesting, African Kangdoms wouldn't have the means to conquer much, though mesoamericans would all die of smallpox anyway, you'd have Africa colonies warring with natives for centuries
>Richest kingdoms
>Full-fledged metallurgy
>Useful animals
>Written language
>Mathematics
>Efficient and productive crops
And not a single ship between them
Post your favorites anti-heroes
Stalin
>>2585441
Explain
what are some /his/ recommend books for
a fairly new /his/torian?
it can be about the Babylonians all the way to the
Third Reich.
>>2585409
No replies to OP. Here, from my shelves:
Pancho Villa - Friedrich Katz
Che Guevara - Jon Lee Anderson (not my favorite but you have to start somewhere)
Stalin: In the Court of the Red Tsar - Simon Sebag Montefiore
Zapata - John Steinbeck (more for semi-contemporaneous context/opinion)
The Destruction of the Americas - Las Casas
Companero - Jorge Castaneda (better than Anderson)
A Lexicon of Terror - Marquerite Feitlowitz
Born in Blood and Fire - John Chasteen
Essential Works of Lenin - Lenin (Dover Publishing; contextual reference)
Fascism - Stanley G. Payne (for context)
Das Kapital (abridged) + The Communist Manifesto - Karl Marx (contextual)
Shadows of Tender Fury - Subcomandante Marcos (Letters/Communications from Zapatistas)
Secret History (CIA operations in Guatemala) - Nick Cullather
House and Street (Domestic Servants/Servitude in Brazil) - Lauderdale Graham
The Assassination of Gaitan - Herbert Braun
The City of Mexico in the Age of Diaz - Michael Johns
Setting the Virgin on Fire - Marjorie Becker
There you go. A brief history of pre/post-revolutionary Latin America.
>>2585526
some books are better than none, thanks
>>2585409
Thucydides.
Underrated roman emperors
>gallienus
>dominitian
>>2585252
Oh? Why? In what way? That might make an interesting thread; let's all make a list usually does not.
>>2585272
Gallientus's handling of the palmyrene empire was genius and dominitian did literally nothing wrong except for not killing the whole senate
LVCIVS DOMITIVS AVRELIANVS, THE NOBLEST ROMAN EMPEROR, WORSHIPER OF GOD, THE ONLY AND GREATEST.