Just read Gilgamesh for the first time, was the first written account in human history really about gay dudes in love?
It wasn't just about two guys being in love, but two guys being in love after one of them is sent by the Gods to stop the other from cucking his people up.
That's right. Gilgamesh is a story about a Gay bull who doesn't want to embrace his mortality.
>>2619164
No
If they were gay they would have written about there sexual encounters(the story didn't shy away from sex as a major plot point was enkidu fucking a head priestest for some god i can't remeber)
>>2619172
Well Gilgamesh just went around raping literally everyone he saw whenever he wanted, and then Enkidu shows up and tries to stop him from doing the raping. They fight so hard that they destroy the doorframe of the front door to the potential rapee's home.
So I guess I can see your point, Gilgamesh sounds like a pretty big asshole desu senpai
Should dueling be made legal again in the west? Sort of edgy, but I don't see the issue with it. I can't find many historical records of it happening on a massive scale to the point where it would do any damage to society, if anything it would reinforce masculine ideals.
Dueling with what weapon? Rapiers? Pistols?
Interesting idea though.
dueling only make sense when you have an aristocratic/noble class and a society where 'honor' is more than a simple abstraction.
They'd have it done with non-lethal weapons like airsoft or nerf guns.
I see tons of people saying that Karl Marx ideas are great and should be studied and used on our society.
But everytime I read about him I simply cannot understand how his ideas could work.
Am I missing something? Am I reading the wrong texts?
>But everytime I read about him I simply cannot understand how his ideas could work.
What ideas?
pros: valued examining economic behavior
cons: like fucking everything else
Marxism.
That is such a made up word with zero meaning behind it. Marx stole every idea from Hegel.
Study Hegel.
True love only exists between men.
i dont think that's true
mother and child >>>>>any other type of love tbqhwyf
>>2619097
t.spartan
What was urban white youth culture like in the early 1900s? (prior to minorities)
poor gangs who sometimes beat the shit out of each other.
Gangs of new york kind of shows what it was like albeit in theatrical style. Little kids were pickpockets. Otheres were just thieves or pimps mostly, however with no drugs to deal and lots of work opportunities it didn't really pay. The women were prostitutes. Some gangs were actually just working class men who liked to be in some sort of community like a union.
That essentially sums up lower class back then, rather harmless compared to today. Because white people are civilized/
>tfw you will never get to grow up playing stickball im the streets of your 100% Italian neighborhood, then go pay a nickel to see Babe Ruth play for the Yankees
Feels bad man
One thing I don't understand about Trench warfare is why it wasn't totally negated by artillery.
Surely if you have a fair amount of artillery you can simply shell the enemy trench until it's destroyed and advance?
1: it only kills if it falls right in a trench
2: one the infantry hear the first shells they will dart into their bunkers
3: trenches are zig zagged so even if you get a direct hit you might not kill anyone or just 1 sentry
>>2618891
Can somebody translate these moonrunes for me?
>>2618904
I'm not referring to killing the infantry but rather blocking up the Trench.
Could you have done it /his/?
Would I have a choice about it?
Die?
Seems easy.
Presuming you're talking about Omaha and not the other beaches that went swimmingly.
>>2618633
I'm an horribly weak dick, but I wouldn't really have had a choice if I was there
rather die like a poor fuck on a beach and do my duty rather than get shot for desertion
No holds barred fight, Teddy Roosevelt with an ice axe vs Winston Churchill with a saber.
Who would win?
You can't really fight with an ice axe since you cant stab. Churchill would be able to block and thrust easily
>>2619072
the ice axe has a sharp point on the bottom end, you can thrust with that.
Hey guys, i have to write a paper on the crusades. It can have anything to do with them.
I can't use my opinions in the writing itself, but i do have to make an arguement and it has to be written in third person.
I'm really just having trouble thinking what to argue that won't call for my opinions. Giving me a real brain aneurysm.
I was thinking something along the lines of "why were these wars unjust".
Any input or opinions appreciated. Should be a rather easy essay once i figure out a good arguement.
>>2618506
You should do it about
>How the Crusades purged Europe of dinduism
And then plot levels of stupidity and chimpouts before and after. That way, it's not your opinion, it's an analysis of facts.
write on how Enrico Dandolo did NOTHING wrong
>>2618506
Write about the crusades as an anticolonialist campaign.
I've noticed that a lot of the ancient greek/roman authors who wrote about myths didn't actually believe in them? In that case, why did they find them valuable, and what role did they play in society?
>>2618501
>believe
It is hard to explain ancient "belief" systems to modern people. They didn't believe in it in the same way as many modern people believe in religion. Mythology is a completely distinct thing. They didn't believe in the same way as someone might believe in God today, they believed that the gods existing explained things that went on around them, and just in case they did exist, would try to assuage their emotions and gain their favour by offering them libations and offerings. It's almost like a form of doublethink. They offered something for a community to rally around, to help explain things in a time when it was difficult to understand why shit like earthquakes and volcanos would happen, to allow people to fabricate elaborate backstories for their people, the lands that they lived in and the natural environment around them to give them purpose and to give them comfort.
^This guy explained it rather well. Religion was more like a mix of superstitions, and their own culture. People seemed to have varied on how literal they took it but it seemed as if there was no such thing as "fanaticism". Only the priests did that and it was kind of amusing for the people.
Personally I like how religion was in ancient times compared to the cancer of abrahamic literalism with their rulebooks and commandments. But it appeals to the lowest common denominator since its simple and easy to grasp, as well as most importantly, universal.
>>2618630
Would this apply to Judaism as well?
How did the Cromwell stack up against the German Panzer IV tank, or Italian and Japanese tanks?
Was it the equal of, or better than, the American Sherman or Soviet T-34?
>>2618428
Italian and Japanese tanks were absolute shit, so they barely merit a mention.
The Cromwell, being a heavy tank, could probably beat either the Sherman or T-34, as they're both medium tanks. However, it also probably is more expensive, uses more fuel, etc.
>>2618453
Or the Panzer IV
>Despite being the son of a prestigious family, financially speaking, he had to start from scratch
>Shrewd politician
>Shrewd general
>His subordinates loved him and followed him around fanatically
>Conquered barbarians left and right
>declined a fucking Triumph
>Literally saved France from being Germans (yikes) by fending off German settlers heading to Gallic lands
>First Roman General to cross the Rhine
>First Roman General to cross the English Channel
>First Roman General to reach Britain
>Defeated Pompey, a living legend that Romans literally compared to Alexander the Great
>So badass sixty senators teamed up to kill him
>So badass sixty people had to stab him thirty-three times to make sure he's dead
>he cuckolded most of them back when he was a consul by the way
>Romans began to deify him as soon as he died
>Roman emperors proudly called themselves "Caesar"
>His family name literally became the word used for "king" in many languages (Caesar, Kaiser, Tzar, Kaysar, et cetera)
>Has a surgical procedure for labouring newborns named after him
>Has a salad named after him
>People name their pets after him
>Still remembered as a fucking legend 2050 years after his death
Julius Caesar is literally the most alpha /his/ figure and no one comes even close.
*impregnates your daughter*
but the salad isnt named after him
also yes he is the most alpha
I agree with everything except the salad thing. The Caesar salad is named after Caesar Cardini, an Italian immigrant in America who created it.
>The middle ages begin with the fall of Rome
>The middle ages end with the fall of Rome
>>2618369
>Rome never fell
>germanics conquered Rome
>>2618369
Damn. Really makes you think.
So it was a clock right
>>2618354
Combination clock, calendar, and temple.
any way I can get a mini Stonehenge to wear on my wrist like a watch? I'm really trying to go for that "old school" look
That was not its purpose, no.
How do I force myself to believe in God? I can't handle this nihilism any more lads
>>2618265
Drink some bleach to dumb yourself down
>>2618265
Anon, it's not possible to escape from nihilism. Powerman won't help you.
>>2618265
You must go into the belly of the whale and rescue your father.