A bit dumb question, but how did WW2 tank crews fighting in desert conditions even breathe in their tanks? It must've been a fucking oven inside.
>>2747545
unbuttoned if you know what I mean
>>2747545
With great difficulty.
>>2747545
You're not always buttoned up. But yeah, it sucks. You have to keep hydrated.
Why did the Achaemenids use Elamite as one of their official languages? What happened here that was so important?
Suza was a pretty relevant city.
>>2747529
Ahahahah buuuuullshit that it existed
Buuuuullshiiit
>>2747695
???
can someone translate this for me please?
>>2747522
Ya kasdun or something
>>2747550
what ??
Ya hussein, which means "oh hussein" as a cry of reverence, generally from shiites
Why is so much of his work about resentment?
Because resentment is the defining feature of modern life.
Because he was a resentful G*rman faggot.
>resentment
Not an argument.
>Britain swears to protect their ally, France
>After the first skirmishes the British Army retreated
>General Alexander says no ground forces should engage the enemy, and that his men are "tired"
>Pull all British troops to a beach and sit there doing nothing for days
>France holds the line, vowing on a soldier to soldier level to defend the British sitting on the beach so they can evacuate
>Dig in and perform exceptionally well given them being outnumbered and fight with tenacity more than comparable to Japs in Iwo Jima
>Only British to participate in the battle are RAF
>British consider this a victory
>British consider French cowards
>British think they weren't cowards
You forgot the last one.
> Britain survives to win the war.
>>2747512
>Britain survives
Lmao
>>2747512
Wew
>well-regulated
>shall not be infringed
So, does "well-regulated" indicate that certain regulations on firearms are constitutional, or does "shall not be infringed" contradict that? Someone give me historical and legal context.
SHALL
> give me historical and legal context
The Constitution is a collection of mere general guidelines and being pedantic about individual words is meaningless in a country with an inherited Common Law judicial system.
>>2747442
Well-regulated meant well equipped in that era. There were frigging privately owned artillery weapons back then.
I have been intrested in eastern european history recently and Poland seems quite intresting but I'm having a hard time with finding their contributment to the European culture apart from people that lived in exile such as Chopin and Marie Curie.
I guess the Lithuanians do count too seeing that they have been in an union.
Can you enlighten me /his/?
nothing
Jan Pawel
>>2747424
elective monarchy gave ideas for how constitutional a constitutional is before just a group of nobles
reformed cavalry ideas
good music
https://youtu.be/Vl6zMiW3iwQ
https://youtu.be/qZKliJgxUTI
https://youtu.be/7SpddNW7a3k
https://youtu.be/fzvxz8L_hg4
Lithuanians were just meatshields and cossack fodder
Shame they let Prussia happen, should have just killed the first duke of prussia for betryaing his oaths
> Discover Anthropology
> Levi-Strauss, Clastres
> Boas is pretty tight
> Don't really understand it fully, enroll as an anthro major
> Want to really figure out what culture is, how different cultural logics can construct different religious perspectives, social systems, ect.
> Fellow students are mostly typical humanities majors.
> Fine, it takes all types.
> Professors are all pseudo-marxists
> Culture is only understood in terms of oppressor-oppressed ethnic/racial/religious groups.
> Have to do so much half-hearted virtue signalling in my papers.
> The light in me is dying.
It's not like the approach is necessarily improper. I just wanted to study culture though. Still haven't really gotten a fulfilling take on the classic stuff.
Just Transfer
>>2747328
Seeing stories like this all the time made me worried for college, but so far i've, for the most part, only worked with unbiased, (or as close as a person can really get), professional instructors. What gives?
>>2747644
It's almost like people are more interested in outraged reactions than the truth on a Taiwanese fecal sculpture forum.
Hello! I've found an interest for reichsführer Himmler recently. I have heard he was into the occult. Can you get his diaries somewhere? or any documents? I want to know what this man was into. Aliens, magic, pony riding. Thanks beforehand! Heil Himmler!
>>2747309
My parents live in the town he grew up in. I walk past the house he lived in frequently and my mother is a teacher at the school he went to.
Just in case you were bored and wanted a free bump
>>2747397
Very intressting. I would like to know more deeper stuff of him. Sadly the "J-elite" probably has all the juicy documents and diaries of Himmler.
He was a pussy incarnate
He only witnessed a single execution, and got so squeamish from it he nearly fainted
Is this a valid variation on modus tollens?
If not P, then Q
Not Q
Therefore P
>>2747220
Let's try this out then:
>If it doesn't breathe then it's dead
>It's not dead
>Therefore, it breathes
Now tell me if you think that's correct
>>2747253
that's a bad example
>>2747275
It's a perfectly valid example.
why did U.S and U.S.S.R divide Korea Peninsula illegally? They even had no right to do military occupation.
>>2747168
Stalin installed a communist government just like he did in every other country the Soviets 'liberated' and South Korea was the best we could do politically and diplomatically to ensure the Korean peninsula wouldn't turn into a communist shithole and provide us with another ally in SEA
>>2747168
They'd just liberated Korea from the Japanese and to be honest, who the fuck was going to stop them dividing up a poor, unknown country for their own strateigic reasons?
The only other power with any balls in the region was britain and she was still picking her teeth up off the floor after ww2
>they had no right
What the fuck does this mean? You can't seriously believe nations actually consider themselves bound to "international law" by anything other than the relational inconvenience breaking them would cause, do you?
International law is just another form of states exerting power and influence over other states. To see it as anything else is foolishly naive
Who contributed less to humanity: Norse or North American Indians?
ur mum
The Canadians
well, the norse kinda gave us the normans
>You will never prove yourself a useful warrior on the field of battle, making a name for yourself fighting for your liege under the guidance of God, raising yourself from the 4th living son of a minor noble to a proud knight, living your life by a code of chivalry.
Why is modern life so terrible?
This is now a forbidden thread!
>>2747045
You heathen! I shall see you on the tourney field for this!
>you will never be dragged from your horse and slowly beaten to death by a mob of peasants who strip you of your mangled armor and sell it for booze money
Test yourself, /his/
https://subjecttestspractice.collegeboard.org/practice/sat-subject-test-preparation-world-history?practiceTestSectionIDKey=Subject.WORLD_HISTORY
>>2746846
22/22.
American-tier easy.
>>2746846
0/22
European-tier irrelevant
Did medieval muslims make any worthwhile scientific discoveries?
Where muslim always savages, or where they actually smart?
Please keep politics out of this.
(Pic is from typing scientific muslim discoveries in google search)
>>2746814
>Where muslim always savages
>Please keep politics out of this.
Wew.
>>2746814
>Did medieval muslims make any worthwhile scientific discoveries?
Arabic numerals for a big one. They're still used today.
>>2746814
This has to be bait