>And so it begins...the first World War®
Shut off the tv right then and there.
>>2770940
That's not how it happened.
>Tell the men to steel themselves. This war, I fear, shall be a Hundred Years' War™
>hol up
>so u be sayin
>we some finna 12th Army Group™?
jesus christ
Can we have an honest debate over, what if Nazis controlled Europe?
Would the world be better off than the shit hole that it is today or worse?
Not even stormfag, I just want to hear the economic side of the Nazi party, I mean brought Germany out of the shitter, could they have done the same for the world?
My understanding is that the Nazi economic policy was standard Keynesianism. Stimulate the economy with deficit spending and public works programmes. The difference is, instead of hiking up taxes to pay off the debt afterwards, they invaded Poland instead.
>>2770910
>Can we have an honest debate over, what if Nazis controlled Europe?
What? in a post WW2 environment?
>Would the world be better off than the shit hole that it is today or worse?
Assuming a 'likely' outcome to WW2, it would be substantially worse, as "winning" in Europe involves defeating the Soviets (somehow) and then getting bombed by the Western Allies until they decide it's not working, can't make a European invasion work, and give up. There is a high likelihood of the deployment of nuclear weapons before this happens, so you've got a Germany ruling over an irradiated cinder of Europe, and subject to embargo from pretty much the rest of the world. That's not a good recipe for economic and scientific progress.
>, I mean brought Germany out of the shitter, could they have done the same for the world?
Not really, no. I'm sure you're going to hear a lot of this, but check out Adam Tooze's work, the Wages of Destruction. They essentially just rode a bubble made out of playing credit games of pitting the U.S. off of France and Britain, and were pretty much doing a phoney recovery that was almost entirely channeled into military spending, things were so bad that they were having peacetime rationing of food in 1938.
>>2770910
>the shit hole that it is today
Western and Central Europe is one of the best places in the world, you underaged shit.
Now that the dust has settled.
We can all agreed that this was the worst example of communism. IF we can even call it communism in the first place.
>>2770797
That was unironically the best example of communism.
Cambodia tho
>>2770797
They were the only ones that made communism relevant in the first place, and also a world superpower
LOL
[Citation needed]
David Cross, Biblical historian
>>2770733
christians on suicide watch
>ETSU BATSU
>HI WOOWIE
What did Carolus Rex mean by this?
>>2770527
>Carolus Rex
Dont you dare call him that
>>2770527
I think he was trying to call you a faggot
>>2770532
What? It means "King Charles" in Latin?
>Should have said >inb4 swedeaboos/SIDF arrives
What is the greatest alliance ever forged in history?
Anglo-Portuguese.
my dick and your mom
Anglo-American.
>yo Albert Speer
>lets raze Berlin and rebuild it lmao
>>2770423
He was clearly on drugs when this picture was taken!!!
>>2770458
one eye on Moscow, the other on London
>>2770458
Is this photo even really him? He looks like a potato.
Do you actually have to read all of the cultural marxists authors like Deleuze, Barthes, Derrida etc in order to be able to criticize them?
No.
Sokal is enough.
Yes?
I miss this game. Is this game history?
>>2770366
coming from someone who went through a long phase of "i don't need to read original texts, i'll just understand them indirectly through handbooks lmao", you will not possess a true understanding of x until you read their original work
>>2770366
I've read a lot of Marxist books already because I went through a leftist phase in my teens. I still have a copy of Anti-Oedipus somewhere. (Not a good book, avoid).
Define and defend these ideals.
>>2770162
Liberty, equality, and brotherhood. All but the last are indefensible.
>liberty
gayfags
>equality
commies
>fraternity
nazis
>>2770162
Radical centrism
>"In the subsequent pages of this book I shall go to the root of the problem. Suffice it to
say here that in the very early years of my youth I came to certain conclusions which I
have never abandoned. Indeed I became more profoundly convinced of them as the
years passed. They were: That the dissolution of the Austrian Empire is a preliminary
condition for the defence of Germany; further, that national feeling is by no means
identical with dynastic patriotism; finally, and above all, that the House of Habsburg
was destined to bring misfortune to the German nation."
Why did he say that?
>the charles II of spain memers are actually neo-nazis
at last I truly see
>>2770071
Essentially, the got half of Germany (and the whole thing when they could manage it) involved in political intrigue across Europe, and micromanaging a variety of untermensch instead of focusing their efforts on expanding and unifying the Volk.
>>2770078
>implying you wouldn't want to help him concentrate
Can we just have an honest discussion and finally put this to rest.
General African Kingdoms thread.
>Berebers
>Nubia
>Ethiopia
>Egypt
>southern Tribal kingdoms
No memeing
No bullshit
No "WE"
Did Africa have LEGIT kings in the acient times and middle ages? And has the eternal aryian European underminded and discredited factual evidence for self gain?
>>2770024
>african KANGdoms
I'm a /pol/ack and the only African state I've ever respected was Rwanda. Recovering from a genocide and then destroying Congo, a country with more than 4 times it's people and a dozen times it's size. You can keep meming about yiur mud worshipping niggers but if you want to actually see a respectable black country looo to Rwanda.
>>2770024
there has been many african kingdoms, just not many that match East/South Asian Kingdoms or South/West European kingdoms UNLESS said African kingdom
>was founded by peoples outside of Africa
>resided in North Africa
Of course Africans had kings. the idea of "kangs" is because Black Africans think they were the kings of ancient Egypt when at best by using a general metric to define "black" people, only one short lived Egyptian dynasty was Black.
If Jesus didn't die for our sins, what point is there to keep living
>>2770022
there isn't. kill yourself
actually don't pls
>>2770022
Convert to Islam, its all the rage.
Don't worry. He did.
What's the point of anything if love doesn't exist?
>>2769905
it does dont worry
>>2769905
It's just a chemical, but it's the best and most important chemical. :))
But it does.
Or atleast its possible becuase people have loved in the past.
Pain can drive us apart
But when its used to build bridges
Thats magic,
Actually love is the only real magic that exists.
Why do people dislikr them so much? what do they do? I don't know much about them. I skimmed their Wikipedia article and it seems like they detest Christianity's pagan roots and try to distance themselves from it but why are they targeted specifically?
*teleports behind your door*
Pshht, nothing personnel, heretic
>>2769874
A group that emerged from third schism within the Watchtower movement in 1935, which emerged from the Seekers movement in the late 1880s, which was rooted in the Third Great Awakening with general ties to the Second Great Awakening, which all occured within Puritan movement settled in the United States by the Scottish and English Pilgrims after persecutions from the Anglican Church - who HOWEVER took the Anglican Bible from 1611 with them and thus - every single movement within th said Puritan movement is LITERALLY based on a royal document ordered by the British monarch in early 17th century.
This is exactly what's wrong with them. They're a post-puritan, post-anglican sect that claims exclusivism of salvation within their ranks despite the fact they've shown up in early 20th century
-AND-
claims they can use a British document from early 17th century to SOMEHOW recreate a shape of a 1st century Church.
>>2769874
Social isolation from the rest of society combined with extreme shunning.
Is Yang right?
Does the common folk prefer someone to rule over them instead of them making decisions?
Poorfags do. The educated middle class however has enough opinions to want to see them realized.
>>2769720
Of course he's right. Why do you think Communism has never actually succeeded? It's because class antagonism isn't that of a master beating his slave, with the slave wanting to escape his oppression; it's a cuck offering his resources to his bull, enjoying his own torment and humiliation. The shitters of the world NEED to be ruled over, and if nobody does, they'll force someone to the top to take their shit and oppress them.