>>2779905
>it's another "buttmad Balkanlar is angry that they didn't get to genocide the Muslims because they're idiots who suck shit at war" episode
>>2779905
Prove me wrong
>Pro-tip: you can't
>>2779913
>As if I would set foot in that wretched place
>tfw you precide over the worst economic decline in the history of your country, decrease of wages and living standards, human rights and 'free speech' abuses, overthrown in the first democratic elections in 20 years, get arrested in the U.K. while visiting and become a national disgrace, but at least you get idolised by edgy altright teens on the internet because they confuse you for using an execution method that actually the regime in Argentina used.
>>2779847
>he fell for the satire again
It just keeps happening! Op is a very stupid newfag who thinks that we're serious about anything.
>>2779860
>we
R*ddit unironically buys into /pol/ memes and is 10x larger
The alt-right worship makes literally no sense whatsoever, they're the types of morons he'd have tossed out of helicopters. Economically the guy was a neoliberal globalist who was buds with Milton Friedman.
>Deus V--
>>2779826
--ult
>>2779845
>could have had an epic about Saladin and his rise to power, youth as a soldier in his uncle's army, rivalry but mutual respect with Richard
>instead we get a shitty Legolas romance drama
What is Jerusalem worth?
Why do people care about genetics? It literally does not matter lmao.
>>2779786
Because for some reason /his/ and /pol/ are apparently full of expert biologists (without any formal education in biology).
>>2779794
>t. no formal education in biology
People who say that usually have shit genes.
Can you understand a society by the criminals it produces?
>>2779773
Sure why not
>>2779773
woah dude can you?
>>2779785
I think so.
http://www.alternet.org/world/35-countries-where-us-has-supported-fascists-druglords-and-terrorists
How the fuck is the USA allowed to get away with these things?
>>2779769
Americans are the worst people on the planet. I'd like if europe won't let those idiots in
Why wouldn't they? The rest of the world was the US' economic, political and military bitch to varying degrees for basically the entirety of the cold war (and to some extent still is)
What do you even mean by get away? Do you understand how fucking nothing of there is for global law enforcement? There's sanctions. That's fucking it unless the U.S. is in the mood for a good war. And nobody ever fucking gets sanctioned for covert operations.
During the Cold War, American policymakers adopted what later historians would refer to as "radical pragmatism" in response to their confrontation with the Soviet Union.
Because most things are better than everyone on earth being slaves forever.
What /his/ your guys view on anarchy?
>>2779736
Real anarchy would be pretty comfy desu
Real anarchy was never tried.
>>2779752
That's because it's a fantasy
> Great Men Theory of History
If you believe that one person can accomplish all history without all of the peoples around him, you unironically belong to "Humanities" parts of H&H.
>>2779693
>hurr it's either great man theory or trends and forces, no gray area!
Retard. It's stupid to suggest that everything would've happened exactly the same had Genghis Khan been stillborn, and it's stupid to think that if Gutenberg didn't exist, we'd still be stuck in the 15th century. It's a mixture of the two.
>>2779709
> there can be second Gutenberg
> but there can't be second Genghis Khan
>>2779719
>reading comprehension
Genghis Khan clearly added some unique traits that impacted history in a major way. However, Gutenberg could've died as a child, and someone likely would've had the same idea within 50 years.
Oh wait, you posted a picture of something that someone once declared was le logical fallacy. Clearly you've le strawmanned my argument, so you're guilty of le ebin logical fallacy :^^^)
Tell me about the Olmecs
they were black.
/thread
WE
WUZ
Postmodernism.
What does it really mean?
Why are pseudo-intellectuals so opposed to it?
>>2779645
Post-modernism is the rejection of grand narratives and absolute truths in all of their forms, including the liberal ideal of human rights. However, because absolute truth is rejected, relativity is embraced and thus the table is set for grand narratives. Think of it as the philosophical equivalent to post-irony. Psuedo-intellectuals (ie modernists) reject it because it's the dark resurgence of fascistic anti-rationalism, the next step in philosophical evolution that supersedes liberal empiricism.
>>2779645
Before I begin I just want to state that I don't necessarily agree with everything in Postmodernism. It does get a bad rap though so I'll try to unpack it's ideas.
Firstly, we must ask ourselves what is Modernity? What does it mean to be modern?
Modernity can be considered and epoch of time, for e.g. “The Modern Era”, “Modern History” etc. (although what that epoch is no one readily agrees on because it is of course constantly changing). Where did these ideas come from? What gives them validity as truth? Can different kinds of modernities exist?
>>2779735
(Cont.) Modernity has strong ties with ideas of Positivism and the Western Tradition (i.e. faith in progress through science – belief in what can be proven. We can understand true knowledge through observation). But this is still an ideology at it's core. I may agree that it's a really good ideology but it's a set of ideas, a meta-narrative.
Postmodernism takes the position that no ideology is truth. All worldviews appeal to the subjectivities of the individual. The goal of which is to appear as the ONLY narrative.
Postmodernism, simply put, takes the position that there are no objective criteria to prove whether a theory is true therefore any theory claiming to have the truth about how to create a better society e.g. Both Western ideas of Modernity AND Marxism is a meta-narrative. They're all someone’s version of reality.
We use Postmodernism as a critical lens to study human geographies, ethnography, etc.
Every human's experience is subjective so when we study society we have to dispose of the meta-narratives.
Did he really deserve to be executed?
>>2779643
Eh... maybe? Kinda? He was kind of a Pinochet type, but nowhere near Bormann or Goering. The one they went too far with was Jodl.
>>2779663
I think they went too far with Rosenberg.
>literally executed for writing a book and "saying mean things"
>>2779684
He was the ideologue, there was no way he was getting out. I still think they were too hard on Jodl.
Why people always fell on revolution meme when smart peaceful reforms could accomplish exactly same results, even if a little bit slower but without killing every third man and destroying everything?
>>2779603
Plebs want quick fixes. Who knew?
why do you hate fun
>>2779603
>Peaceful reform accomplishes anything
Only when it's in the interests of the money.
Western European Gothic cathedrals won't see the light in another 800 years, Anglo built stick churches, lol, meanwhile this baby existed...
But we are the subhumans, right?
maybe if you hid in there the ottomans wouldn't have found you
>>2779491
Armenians aren't subhumans, they are just evil.
>>2779491
Georgia, 4th century AD, FOURTH, I'm curious to see how Anglos, Franks, Germanics and loooool slavs were doing, c'mon, show me!!
What did Kant mean by this?
Anyone got that quote from Kant against the Jews (namely that they should be drowned) some anon mentioned in another thread?
Thanks in advance!
>appropriating catlady spinster resources
based
>>2779460
"People should understand the circumstances of abandoned children, but I can't think of a just way to force them to do this within my established moral framework."
Was there ever a time when people successfully stopped a war by protesting against it? I've been reading a lot about WW1 recently, and it is striking to me how just about everybody seemed to understand that it was nuts, yet it simply continued without end until one side was completely exhausted and simply couldn't fight any longer. The Vietnam war seems like a logical candidate, but remember, that still went on for many years without being affected by protests.
>>2779403
Major wars I am not sure of, but smaller things I am aware of.
Look in 2014 for example with Obama's red line chemical event in Syria, the public did mass demonstrations against any action against Syria. Eventually we didn't follow through.
>>2779444
Th affairs of nation-states are bigger than you and me friend. We are just the pawns in the chess game, not the player
If a state permits a demonstration it effectively explains it does not feel threatened by it. A successful demonstration is one that grows into something greater.
>>2779444
>Eventually we didn't follow through.
This exactly, follow through