/his/'s Favourite Australian Pm?
Deakin to Howard only please.
gough whitlam for having the most ridiculous name i've ever heard
[spoiler]i know nothing about australian history[/spoiler]
Billy Hughes
Harold Holt.
All Australians should aspire to be like him.
What was the military strength of the Crusader States like in the decades before the fall of Jerusalem to Saladin?
From different sources I've read that in the immediate aftermath of the First Crusade, when many went home, Jerusalem was left with about 1,000 to 2,000 soldiers. And that on the eve of Hattin, almost a century later, the Kingdom of Jerusalem could muster about 20,000 men to field.
Does anyone have other figures and sources to provide?
I'm also very curious about the manpower figures for the other states: the County of Edessa, the County of Tripoli and the Principality of Antioch.
Edessa was the first to fall. Is there any reputable source on how many knights, men-at-arms and other soldiers they could field?
>>2782599
That standard was that they were low manned and highly funded. I believe that when Salado took Jerusalem there were two Templars in the whole city. Instead of relying on pure manpower, they had an advanced network of castles and fortifications to defend the area. The knights' attendants and servants were called to the field with them on many occasions as well, as were mercenaries. At any given time the states could muster somewhere around 8-12 thousand troops for a short campaign. However, Templars were very few and their militaries were still comparatively small at full size.
>>2782599
I don't have it on me at the moment, so my numbers might be off, but according to
>The Crusades: The Authoritative History of the War for the Holy Land by Thomas Asbridge
The manpower available to the leaders of Outremer was surprisingly small - lots of campaigns talk of forces of a few hundred knights backed by a thousand or so other forces. The Battle of Inab, for example, had just 1,600 men from Antioch. Before the rise of Zangi al-Din, there were even some horrifyingly small expeditions consisting of something like ~50 or so knights.
The general idea seems to be that Outremer lasted only as long as it did because the Latins were far more concerned with holding onto it than the Muslims were with ousting them. The Muslim polities in the region were constantly fighting with eachother, and generally seemed to be more concerned with gaining hegemony over eachother rather than eliminating the Crusader states. Take the Zangid dynasty, for example. Zangi al-Din fought almost his entire career not against Outremer, but fellow Muslims in the region, only turning against Edessa at the end of his career. In fact, Zangi was so feared by other Muslims that Damascus even allied with the Kingdom of Jerusalem.
>>2785469
Good points. I recall reading about Crusader states allying with one or another Muslim leader against other Muslim factions during their first century there.
Anyone else pick President Garfield as their favorite?
>>2782592
I like obama more he's the true kang
>>2782592
Garfield will always have a special place in my heart for having given a cute little proof of the Pythagorean theorem. This proof is essentially "half" of the well-known "inscribe a square inside a larger square at any angle you like" argument. Although perhaps not totally rigorous, it is simple enough to persuade quickly. Middle schoolers and high schoolers can quickly appreciate its truth.
Garfield's proof would actually make a useful pedagogical tool in secondary math education, as its use would also provide a small piece of math history.
http://io9.gizmodo.com/james-garfield-was-the-only-u-s-president-to-prove-a-m-1037750658
>>2782592
Reading pic related really made me feel for him. He seemed like such a kind family man, too intelligent for politics.
why didn't Hitler bomb the shit out of the east coast of the USA during WW2? If Japan had the capabilities to bomb as far as Pearl Harbor, what why didn't a single bombing raid take place on America's east coast?
>>2782430
Bombing Russians V Bombing Burgerland is this even a serious question. Hitler had no interest in Burgerland.
>>2782444
This combined with the fact that they didn't have aircraft carriers. OP do you think the nips flew all the way from Japan to Hawaii?
>>2782430
Tell me OP, what could Germany use in 1941 to bomb US East coast?
Is it we wuzzing to take pride in your ancestors' achievements if you are of mixed descent? If not, where is the line drawn? At 1%, 0.5%, 0.00005%??
For example, I'm half Persian half Slav/Northern European. I feel strange taking pride in the achievements of my ancestors on both sides, or even just assimilating into one of the cultures today, as I'm not fully one or the other.
This seems sort of like a /pol/ thread (besides uh, you know, the mixed dude making the thread) so to make it /his/ related I had a backup question. How were mixed race people treated in the past? Speaking about Europe/Middle East, I already know about all the Spanish new world system with all the fractions and stuff.
Last thing: tell me stories about the achievements of the Persian Empire/Persians in general before Islamic conquest. Always wanted to learn more about that side, plus I need ammo against my /pol/tard friends in real life.
Thx guys.
PS: The one thing I am not proud of at all and I wish for people to never find out about is my Prussian heritage.
Daily Reminder: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ztOV2wrrkY
>>2784712
>How were mixed race people treated in the past? Speaking about Europe/Middle East
They wuz Roman emperors n shit.
Pic related, half Italian half Punic
Septimus Severus
You have no heritage and if you are the shitskin kind of '''''persian''''' doubly you have none. You're the rootless individual who will belong to no tribe, you were unlucky not be some kind of mass-offspring between different races, like those mestizos or the Anglo-Indians. At least they had a community of other mudbloods of the same type to assimilate into.
How true is this image?
>>2782317
Not true at all
>>2782317
Completely true
Let's settle it for once and for all. Are Northern Indians Caucasoid or Australoid?
australoids
some are mixed with elamites
better question:
are east africans negroids or caucasoids?
>>2782232
Neither they are Pajeet street shitters, next thread.
I'm not a /pol/ack, but how in the fuck is the number 6 mil even feasible? I'm trying to understand the logistics of purging that many people outside combat under 4 years and shit does not compute
>>2784590
Go read Snyder of Hilberg.
Nigga, the Hutus did 800,000 in a hundred days with machetes.
That would give us a rate of 8,000 a day, which means that if the Interhamwe had been in charge of the Holocaust, they could have gotten it done in a little under two years.
To put this in perspective, between 15 and 25 million Soviet civilians died during the same timeframe.
You know, people just used to have this silly tendency to die a lot if you put them in camps with little to no food and access to medical care while still having to work a lot
Crazy, I know
What happened to the Amazonian Guard? Any other crazy "alternative" guards out there in history you want to talk about?
kek they abandoned Gaddafi as soon as shit got real
>>2782145
The first emperor of the Mauryan Empire of India once had a bodyguard corps of topless female archers guarding the inner palace.
On account that he couldn't trust the men to guard him in his private moments.
>>2782161
No shit, they only existed because of Gaddafi's weird fetishes, and were no more than glorified sex toys. He could rape any of them as he pleased.
How did France fuck up so bad and lose everything?
>>2784406
Britain was better at war
Britian had a larger exporting population
Britain was Anglican so didn't have to worry about converting people
Britain was fine with killing tribes
Britain could focus on colonisation rather than some Frankish borders
>>2784406
Either sell it to the US or see the US take it by force just like the original 13 colonies.
>>2784424
France would have decimated America in a war
Should there be a human right to die? No matter the circumstances? Is it really more moral for people to be isolated to their mind about suicide for fear of being locked up in a loony bin? Not to mention chance of pain, suffering and permanent damage as well as trauma to the person who has to find them.
>>2782099
For people with terminal illnesses, who are in suffering, I say they should have the right to choose to end their lives. If not that, to be put into a coma until they die naturally.
In cases of depression and suicidal tendencies, I'm not so sure. People can recover from that shit somewhat, and usually suicidal ideation isn't there to stay.
>>2782099
Yes because killing yourself is abnormal
>>2782099
>Should there be a human right to die?
No. The moment you legalize euthanasia, you open up a pandora's box where insurance companies will actively pressure older patients into killing themselves.
But are actually considered by historians to likely be apocryphal amalgams?
>>2782949
King arthur
>>2782949
Robin Hood.
Jesus
>tfw don't know what's real or not anymore
>don't know if the things I believe and the opinions I have or the 'facts' I know are genuine, or just the zeitgeist result of decades of conditioning done by the CIA/Jews/Mass Media/whatever you want to call it
>tfw don't even know if the thought that my thoughts aren't genuine is genuine
losing it here lads
>>2781841
Welcome to the real world. Stay sharp and believe no one
The truth is that you can't escape the insanity.
>>2781841
Do psychedelics and lose yourself.
Is it immoral to watch porn?
yeah god hates you when you touch your penis
>>2781770
that's why I don't use porn
did hitler really kill himself?
>>2781756
Yes because he was tired of shitting his pants and having to clean himself, including his not-so-little hypospadias dick and 1-ball sack afterwards.
PS: why do my Hitler's cock threads keep getting deleted???
>>2781756
Without a doubt!!!