>tfw earlier generations imagined that technological development would lead to a utopia but instead it led to a dystopia of degeneracy, ignorance and materialism
>>3350823
>implying this isn't a utopia
>young rationalists trusting old rationalists
Nah it's pretty great. You're just a cunt
What makes the black slavery that took place between 1619 to 1865 in the United States more important than all the other slavery throughout history?
United States are important
>when was the last time you heard an Irishman bitching how the world owes him a living
Try Ireland, there's millions of them.
Also <citation needed>.
>>3350707
That picture is retarded, and using it makes your thread shit beforehand.
US slavery is obviously the most relevant practice of slavery for Americans to learn about. Couple that with the immense cultural influence the US has, and you the narrative of black slavery at the hand of whites gets exported to a lot of the western world. Hence in most of the western world slavery refers almost by default to the black slavery in the US.
Note that a significant portion of the world (the non-western part) does not think like this at all.
Are Italians always this pathetic?
They lost to ethiopia so yes
>>3350536
All peoples other than the Nordics are pathetic
If you are not Nordic, you are not White and you must die.
Not in my hearts of Iron game
Child is idolizing Rome.
Adulthood is realizing China makes more sense.
Autistic chinks are hardly something to admire.
>>3350518
At least China still exists.
>>3350518
>Autistic chinks that somehow manage to build a bureaucratic tradition so autistic that they have an unbroken historical record and better bookkeeping than the west until the 20th century
Eurangutans wish they could compare.
Why would *anyone* be against egalitarianism?
That's like setting yourself up to be a comic book villain.
Because I'm way smarter than 99% of the human race and this can be proven empirically. Why should the opinion of some worthless white neckbeard on 4chan have the same weight as mine?
>>3350477
Read Evola, you cuck
Because some people lack morals.
Did a warrior as big as Gregor Clegane(7-8 ft tall / 450 lbs) ever exist in history?
I can only think about Goliath
>>3350320
Charlemagne was supposed to be huge, but the records are iffy because there was no standard "foot" unit back then.
>>3350320
How the fuck would they put so much muscle on their huge frame back then?
They didn't have anabolics and modern nutrition.
Do you realise he eats like 12 thousand calories a day and pins his ass with roids 2x a week?
Sancho VII of Navarre
They exhumated his body in 2010 and the historian and forensic anthropologist, Luis del Campo, who studied his mortal remains, affirms that he was 2.23 metres (7.3 feet) in height
He was called "The strong" and was famous for cutting in two Moors and their African slaves with a single sword swing
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sancho_VII_of_Navarre
Care to explain /his/?
obligatory
>>3350280
Pyramids are the easiest shape to make, thus if you're going to make a MASSIVE structure, it basically must be a pyramid.
>>3350280
People can stack big blocks in triangle shapes everywhere mate.
*creates the perfect system*
pssssst...nichts persönliches..... kapitalismus
>>3349952
are you trying to trigger the whole damn board?
>>3349955
not an argument
Mfw capitalism is doomed to fail.
They didn't do much to create rock, as far as I know, but they did an enormous amount to develop it and bring it to some of its heights.
>>3349844
This looks like a /mu/ thread to me.
>>3349858
/mu/ is 90% teenage pop, plus one classical music thread that miraculously appears sometimes. Tumbleweeds would greet me there, most likely. And I suspect that the historical dimension is important. There's something about the cultural, historical, economic, and political climate of England in the 60s, I think, that made it ripe for hard rock to flower there.
>>3349844
For the most part it's because many black-blues records were taken from America to Britain.
Not many people in America were fond of black, southern blues, but the British were. They turned it into their own, thus creating bands like the Beatles, thus creating the well known "British Invasion" of music.
Why did the ottoman empire take in the iberian jewswhen they got banished?
Also general ottoman empire thread.
Which caliphate was the best in
>military
>science
>economy
>social tolerance
>>3349780
>Why did the ottoman empire take in the iberian jewswhen they got banished?
They did
>>3349780
to reploblate greece
salonica was entirely deserted after the romans were kicked out
Most importantly, why is he the projectile weapon of choice for this camp?
>>3349549
The filmmaker doesn't understand catagorical imperative
>>3349549
Because he helped define the philosophy and principles of the Enlightenment. A lot of his ideas and claims are just now being interpreted correctly, which means he not only helped form the Western civilisation from like 300 years ago until now. And not in the shitty sense we all think of the West today, but in a much deeper, humanist way. Anyway you gotta read some Kant to understand. First thing thats gonna pop into your head is 'but thats exactly what/how we function today' and thats exactly the point, because without him we wouldn't have this way of thinking
>>3349549
Kant's moral philosophy basically boils down to "treat others as you want to be treated", and since Trumplets probably wouldn't want to be treated the way they are treating others (e.g. discriminated because of their ethnic background) they are figueratively throwing Kant at their heads so that they might understand that they are in the wrong.
Seems like our fore-fathers liked their women THIC.
Why did beauty standards change so much?
>>3349547
Women in charge = fat women are celebrated (like now)
Intermediate = skinny women are celebrated
Men in charge = men are celebrated
>>3349558
Romans --> Italians
>>3349287
t. Terrone
Illyrians --> Hercegovinans
>>3349312
HERCEGOVNO !!!
Let's discuss about the massacres, war crimes, atrocities and genocides perpetrated by communist and/or simpathyzing regimes.
>>3349252
>*state capitalist regimes
ftfy
It wasn't exactly a massacre, it was less one-sided than you think despite one side having fucking tanks
>>3349252
Okay, how are we going to discuss it for what ultimate purpose?
ITT: Historical bad guys that are considered good guys by the populace no matter the overwhelming evidence proving the contrary.
pic very related.
This genocidal fucker
>>3348863
Have you spent the last fifteen years under a rock?