People realising they're screwed

ITT: sting operations ft. gordon ramsay

I can't understand a word thats being said

Proceed

>>7709954
Only fellow bongs can understand bonglish

>>7709893
ITT: dick-all

>>7709954
Would you like me to translate?

All 3 videos:
You're under arrest!

This pleases me.

>>7709981
I wanna know why.
2nd guy's a pedo, but what about the others?

>>7710027
I believe all 3 were arrested for same thing.

But they didn't have sex with a kid????
They arranged to sure but they didn't so how can they be arrested? Also source?

>>7709965
Fellow report bonging in

Enjoying the pedo justice going on

>>7710045
I don't know if you're aware of the law or not, but arranging to meet a child with the intention of having sex is indeed a crime.

File: 12232110_563017207212186_581571647_n.webm (2MB, 236x426px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 236x426px

contribooting

>>7709893
>>7709894
>>7709896
>>7710208
>>7710216

> None of them asking to see a badge

>>7710262
>About to bang an underage girl
>Someone shouts "you're under arrest"
>Try to be a smartass.
No, you shut the fuck up and look at the ground because all you have in mind right now is the two pent-up niggers you'll share a cell with.

File: jimmy-savile.gif (396KB, 280x280px) Image search: [Google]

396KB, 280x280px

>Britain cracking down on pedos

>>7710278
It's not in the united states of getting blacked.

>>7710411
That was an exaggeration, but your life is still getting turned upside down live.

>>7710262
What is a citizens arrest????

so the police pretended to be underaged children to bait out pedos? damn stay away from jailb8

>>7710445
It's not the police its just a bunch of guys going round doing it finding them, and then phoning the police

>>7710262
They are not cops.

>>7710432
AFAIK you can only use citizen's arrest on a person that is caught committing a crime red-handed (i.e. after the offence) or if the offence is imminent. Since the accused never got to (statutorily) rape anyone the first point doesn't hold, and because there is no potential victim present, the offence can not possibly be imminent. A citizen's arrest would be unlawful and the accused would have the legal right to defend themselves against any attempts to restrain them by civilians.

Are they even speaking English? Are these all civilians? Do you have police in the UK?

>>7710456
i remember watching a russian group of people catching people and the dude the got caught was humiliated and beat up.

Source: http://on.fb.me/1HUk36F

Link shortener because 4chan won't let me post a Facebook link

You guys never seen To Catch a Predator on Dateline NBC?

>>7710491
Why thank you very much Mr anon, I shall take that to thought next time I apprehend a criminal

so if this is a citizen arrest (and not good one) did the guys actually went to jail ?

>>7710216
>>7710208
>>7709896
>>7709894
>>7709893
thats a police job I would love to do

>>7710878
From what I can tell from source, all were arrested recently and we're charged waiting trial.

Bunch of chav thugs using the anti-pedo sentiment to harass and intimidate people.

>>7712398
Anon completely right? I used to be a cop. Arrested a repeat offender chomo once. During booking, I went in back to let other inmates know. Guards made sure these inmates intermixed at one point. Poof! Problem solved.

>>7712721
Sorta this. They're just regular citizens using the tactics of regular authority officials - aggressively blab a bunch of shit and hope they don't know their rights.

Not saying pedo's don't deserve it, but any of those guys could have walked (or ran) away at any time, at least in the US. Otherwise it's kidnapping.

>>7710045
I dont know about the Britbongs, but in the US, intent is illegal as well. Usually its harder to prove but in these cases I assume they have email logs of these men stating reeatedly their intent.

>>7713168
Impersonating a police officer or entrapment in some cases are illegal as well, aren't they?

>>7709965
Even I can't understand it and I've lived here 25 years.

>>7709893
What language is this

what. the. fuck.

if this shit is legal, i'm never going back to the UK ever again. this has so many issues... i mean, as a lawfag from the continent, i knew common law had some fucked-up shit, but this really takes the cake.

age of consent of 16-18 is questionable to begin with
people who presumably have little understanding of the actual law accusing people - recipe for disaster in general
a bunch of wankers going around, pretending to be underaged girls, probably aggressively enticing meet-ups - entrapment, promoting and facilitating crimes, unfit and therefore not unlawful attempt because there never was any underage girl to begin with and therefore no way to have sex with her, etc.
"arresting" people - not a public servant, pretending to have legitimacy to arrest people, potentially unlawfully restraining a free men
deliberately making the "arrest" as unintelligible as possible and showing up with half a dozen guys - either they're afraid and spout bullshit to sound legitimate or they're just complete bullies
filming people and publishing it together with their full name and wild allegations of criminal sexual behaviour - presumption of innocence, privacy concerns, serious defamation, media ethics

holy shit. i hope they stumble across a pedo lawyer and get the shit sued out of them. there is a reason why force has been monopolised by the state in the form of the police. there is a reason why we have due process and the presumption of innocence. there is a reason why it is highly problematic when someone first entices crimes, creates new otherwise unavailable opportunities and then punishes people for it.
even if we conceed they have a good cause (of which i'm really not sure of desu) - their methods probably cause more damage to the rule of law than the occasional man who enjoys having sex with willing teenage girls.

fuck those guys. i'm triggered. this is taking the idiocy of UK "community support officers" and dialing it up to 11.

>>7713646
found the baby fucker

>>7713705
lol zing

>>7713705
>15yo young woman
>baby

you are part of the problem. nobody in their right mind condones sexual abuse of children. but we're not talking about children. this pedo witch hunt has really gotten out of proportion, especially in the US.
>jailing 8yo kids for murder, 14yo kids for drugs, etc and 16yo joining armed forces
well, duh, they know what they're doing
>protecting 17yo young adults from porn and sex
well, duh, they don't know what they're doing

not that it's much better in Europe...
>prosecuting 17yo for shooting nude selfies and distributing them at school
well, duh, they're old enough to know what they did was wrong so we can punish them, but they're not old enough to make decision about their own body.
>logic!

They do it for the Facebook likes LOL!

>>7713646

Agree 100%

If this was like that batman catching pedos vids it would be more acceptable

>>7713646
totally agree

Any of you moralfags gonna contriboot?

>>7709893
at first I thought these were just fuck heads starting shit cuz I can't even hear what's going on but there pedos! this thread is awesome!

>>7713646
>>7714348
you niggas are scared cuz we all know you got CP on your computer.

>>7709954
>>7709965
>>7710538
>>7713386
>>7713390
How retarded are you people that you can't understand what they're saying? Pull the dicks out of your ears. I'm fucking American and I can understand it.

>>7709893
This is literally some fat guy walking around in body armour pretending to be a bounty hunter?

While his Daily Mail buddies round up on the accused paedophile?

He should walk around with the chair and tell them. Please have a seat, im chris hansen

>>7713646
agree

>>7714702
Nah dawg, it's a matter of principle. It's easy to show why: Just imagine a group of thugs walks up to you in the street, accuses you of being a pedo, detains you, films everything and posts it on the internet. Even if you're totally innocent - you've just been violated and completely ruined for the rest of your life. You have absolutely no guarantee that they'll only ever target "the right people".

This is not anything to be taken lightly. There are many well documented cases in the UK of anti child porn operations by the police targeting completely innocent people, ruining countless families and causing dozens of suicides (e.g. Operation Ore). Even if the accusation is bogus - standard proceedure is taking the accused into custody, raiding the house, urging their children to describe all kinds of sexual abuse and forbidding contact indefinitely. And really - if you're the non-accused partner - would you ever let your significant other come back to your home, bed and kids even if there is absolutely no substantial evidence? If the police already has such a bad track record we really don't need private citizens barging in on that market...

>>7713646

> age of consent of 16-18 is questionable to begin with

ah right another nonce. yeah don't come back.

>>7715451

Don't try and fuck children and you might be ok. It's what i do and I can happily say i've never had any issues from it.

>>7713382
Get a load of this guy.

Are you 12?

>>7717320
Impersonating a police officer or entrapment in some cases are illegal as well, aren't they??

>>7709894
lol i love how he touches his pants to see if he pissed himself already.

10/10 fucking 10!!!

It took me getting through every single one of these before I could understand what was even happening or what these euro cunts were saying lmfao.

Its just a shitty socialist To Catch A Predator.

>>7717304
don't be naive. it's the internet.

it could be a malicious stranger (4chan anyone?), but just think of your asshole friend (you know the one i'm talking about). he's chatting with an underage girl, gives your name, makes an appointment. then he calls you, tells you he wants to meet at a location. there you'll get swarmed by people with cameras. now you'll never find employment, housing and partners ever again.

sound like a good deal to you? lolol, it's just a prank, bro?

thank you very much, but i'd like to *know* i'm okay, not rely on the fact that i *might be* okay. it's always funny when it's not you. but what if it is one day?

>>7717347
I think he was actually trying to hide an erection..

File: brock.gif (387KB, 500x447px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 500x447px

>>7709894
Thats down the street from my house!

>>7709896
Deptford! Holy shit my neighbourhood is full of Peados!

>>7709893

Too many innocent male lives have been ruined because of this witch hunt.

Guy pisses on a tree? Pedo and homeless forever.
Girl regrets it the day after? prison, then homeless forever
Make a girl angry for any reason? Pedo and homeless forever.
Pat a kid's head? raped to death in prison

I hope the men enabling this bullshit die horrible deaths. Pedophilia is indeed the new witch hunt.

at least they're not attacking paediatricians anymore

>brits cracking down on pedos
>no shitskin arrests

Fake and gay.

>>7717695
Not only racist,but a blind racist. How depressing is your life?

Are there full version of these clips on YouTube? I'm not gonna make a Facebook account for this shit

LOL this is BS, Anyone of those could have walked away no problem. And if they had been grabbed it would be assault.

Laughing at that pedo who said she thought she was 17 is a joke.

This is a load of bollocks. I mean I'm glad there dumb enough to not walk away because the Pedophilic scum need throwing away but they could have just walked away at any time and had not been grabbed.

>>7718667
Educate yourself on law. When performing a citizen's arrest you can use reasonable force to prevent a suspect from escaping until a police officer arrives.

>>7715451
What this nigger said.

I've known people who've been fucking beaten in there own home and lynched due to rumors. It was only after the guy lost his GF, Home and most of is friends it came out as a lie because the fucking bitch got a conscience in her late teens. You should only be labelled as a Pedophile when it's 100% proven, Not when some vigilante with a facebook account thinks he's got the right guy.

>>7718667
>And if they had been grabbed it would be assault
you dont know anything about the law do you?

>>7718683
And you need 100% factual evidence when making a citizens arrest.

>>7715083
It is pretty sad innit. You can honestly hope they will walk into some fag with balls and a weapon.

>>7713815
Shit's even more fucked up in the US. Basically, age of consent is determined on a state level. So in some states you can have sex with a 16-year-old and not have broken the law.

HOWEVER, CP is a federal crime. Which means that while an act can be legal, depictions of that same act can be illegal.

The fact that taking a picture of yourself is illegal is simply mind-blowing from a legal perspective.

>>7718705
I can bet you 100% they wouldn't go on anyone who looked like they could be trouble. Just the weaker ones who they know won't walk away or cause and issue.

>>7718716
You are probably right, they just like accosting 70yr old grandpas and feeling like a big man.

>>7718716
They arrested a guy that tried to run them down with a car.

>>7718725
No the police did, They probably shit and ran off.

>Newfag here

Im liking this more than rekt threads!

Ive never liked anything more than rekt threads

>>7718697
>N.B. A person cannot make a citizen's arrest before an offence takes place (excluding any indictable offence covered by the Criminal Attempts Act 1981)

CAA is later specified to only allow for a citizens arrest to prevent damage to persons or property or the offender escaping before a constable can assume responsibility for him.

So no, this is not a citizen's arrest. In fact, the UK has explicitly banned what is happening here.

>>7718740
Exactly, Fucking cretin.

I get the guys is doing good things by catching the people he has but he's doing it in such a shit way that he could cause so much damage it's not warranted. People see these video's and instantly think the people there catching are Pedo's. There's no evidence backing it at all to to the public eye. You might as well go and point at someone in a busy shop and shout "Thief!!!"

>>7718740
What part of what you just posted did you not understand?

>>7718764
None of it. UK law clearly prohibits preemptive citizens arrests, except where personal injury or damage to property is imminent. Now explain to me how this is not a "citizen's arrest" occurring before the commission of a crime, and thus clearly illegal.

File: TrumpBingBing2.webm (3MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 640x360px

>>7709893
UK's version of the Miranda rights:
"Don't move u undastand wot I mean ye?"

>>7717609
In front of Belushi's at Greenwich?

>>7712670
>we're charged waiting trial.
>we're

that slip is actually really good.

>>7709896
The original oompa loompa got fucking old

>>7718903
If that's what you think it means then you clearly misunderstood it.

>>7719061
Then what does it mean?

>>7717712
The amount of normies on the 3D porn boards is truly disgusting. My bet is they're all from Facebook.

>>7715083
>Fat fuck walking around in body armor and pretend authority
>has fat fuck friends act as muscle...
And this is different from the Police how?

>>7709893
Is this like British To catch a predator

> Only 5 videos
> All by OP

Why you fuckers don't contribute?

File: 1439237980871.gif (660KB, 200x199px) Image search: [Google]

660KB, 200x199px

>>7710216
>>7710208
>>7709896
>>7709894
>>7709893

>tfw gf is 17 and i'm 20

>>7710373

Not common knowledge anon. Most people are totally clueless.

>>7719821
thats nothing tho. also too old.

>tfw im 27 fucking a 15 yo

>>7710216
>>7710208
>>7709896
>>7709894
>>7709893
Are these real police? I'm British and i've not seen police talk and act like this before

>>7719873
Just had a thought.

Legally speaking, is getting pegged sex? I'm sure you could get hit with indecency in the presence of a minor or something like that, but isn't it not technically statutory rape?

>>7719983
Nah, these look like the kind of blokes that do Civilian Arrests. Pretend to be a underage girl online and lure the predators out and snatch em.

>>7719821
In Utah that is fair game as you get 4 years leeway around 18 I.e. a 14 year old could date an 18 year old or a 17 year old a 21 year old.

>>7720546
Ya but any premarital sex and they put you in that special underwear that slowly twists your balls off.

>>7720310
I think rape has to be forced penetration, and if it is an object penetrating you and nothing her, then I would assume no

>original filenames
OP is Chris Hansen

ah luv ta knick a peedophile innit

is there a youtube channel for this?

>>7719786

Because only OP goes on Facebook

>>7719193
The authority isn't pretend, and they have rules and courts to adhere too. That is how they are different from Police you edgy fuck.

>>7713646
Are you simple? This is just a few fucks pretending to arrest people. They aren't police community support officers. Do you think anything happened after the end of these videos?

They are at the very most making citizen arrests probably for some social media wank off with other simple minded retards. If the "suspected pedo" had balls he would probably have a suit for unlawful arrest or false imprisonment.

That's the fun thing about common law it has common sense built up over centuries.

Wait until you have graduated before passing judgements.

>>7721725
wait until you have basic skills in reading comprehension before passing judgements...

i've never claimed they were CSOs. just that it takes the idea of civilians playing pretend as tough cops one step further.

why would graduating change anything? nobody teaches common law around these parts. i'm not too familiar with the UK brand, but since graduation i've spent a lot of time getting into the US variant.

sure, there are some neat ideas, like being able to react relatively quickly to new developments, but i much prefer civil law, clear statutory laws made in a political process rather than expanding case-specific decisions made by a bunch of unaccountable geezers in robes into general rules. as a citizen i want to be able to look at one statute and know the law, rather than do extensive case law research 200 years back to answer simple questions. the thing with it being "built up over centuries" is exactly the problem. there is a tendency to rely too much on existing case law, even when the case at hand should really be distinguished. there's not much a carriage accident from 1652 has in common with a modern car accident. and all those centuries-old exceptions make modernisation very difficult. for example: the US prides itself on their very strong first amendment. but "obscenity" is still a huge deal. and there's no real justification for it other than: that's the way it's always been. historical exception. if you read some of the supreme court case law from WW2 or McCarthyism you could hurl. but since that shit has never been overturned, it still stands today. stare decisis.

there's no perfect legal system. but i feel common law is further away than civil law.

>>7721725
They were all arrested, charged..

Some were arrested ON camera by uniformed police.

>>7722872
Damn, I wanna see that. Link?

>>7718683

Only if you've caught the person red-handed. I would laugh my ass off if any of these fuckwits tried this on me. Wannabe police officers who failed to get into the force spouting the law to somebody like they have any power, it's hilarious.

File: 11156636_1534319580222659_335218811_n.webm (1008KB, 236x426px) Image search: [Google]

1008KB, 236x426px

>>7723124

>>7723161
They are caught red handed. Arranging to meet a child for sex is a crime, them turning up is the crime.

>retards ITT thinking these are real policemen

This shit is rage inducing to be honest, they're not real police nor do they have any powers and I have no idea why everybody in these videos are admitting anything to strangers and going along with being handcuffed so easily.

If anybody tries this on you, just laugh and walk away. If they physically stop you then that is harassment and possibly assault. The police have already come out and said that they do not condone their actions.

I get what they're trying to do, but they're going about it in the completely wrong way. Don't pretend you're a police officer if you're not, don't spout laws if you're not in any power to enforce them.

What they should be doing is arranging everything they do with the police before hand and let the people who actually have the powers do the talking and arresting.

>>7710545
Source is actually pretty epic.

The amount of stupid comments from friends/family members of the guys getting picked up coming in and defending the pedos are hilarious!

>>7723225
It's actually completely legal to use reasonable force to stop a suspect escaping before the police arrive. Also when doing a citizen's arrest, it's required to tell the person they're being arrested and for what reasons.

As for the police not condoning their actions, that's because these guys are showing them up! They've caught 30 nonces in just over a month, while the police drive around issuing tickets for minor road traffic offences.

>>7723246

It's legal to use reasonable force when somebody is caught red handed, anything else is just conjecture. Somebody standing around in a public place is no where near enough to warrant force, which is why I don't understand why they're giving these wannabe-officers the time of day by talking to them. If some pillock came up to you and demanded your name, would you give it to them? If they suspect you of something then they have to contact the police.

>>7712745

Oh I'm sure that happened anon.

>>7723293
It's not coincidence, they didn't happen upon these people by luck, the meeting was prearranged.

If you prearrange the meeting with someone, and they tell you their name, what they look like, what they're wearing etc etc.. it's pretty hard to use the defense "I was just hanging out here matey"

>>7723225
Or... Or... You know... You could just not talk about sexual things with kids on the internet. You know... Like a normal person.

>>7723246
>nonces

from the webms posted here it seems they pose a teenagers, not kids. so you mean men going for nubile teenage women who agreed to have sex? how about they catch some real criminals? actual pedos grooming prepubescent children or, here's a suggestion, how about the family members who are responsible for 90+% of abuse anyway?

them going after people who are neither actual pedos nor have unwilling victims seems like such a waste of effort.

damn dirty pedos, lusting after our 15yo toddlers! we better stop them, just think of the children!

what is their MO btw? how do they know their full names when they show up? did these men really volunteer their full legal names to strangers on a chat room? if so, this whole thing is laughably misguided and they're just catching the absolute moronic bottom of the barrel of sex offenders...

>>7723374
On a related note, the whole "stranger danger" thing is laughably misguided. People are always so concerned about those few cases where a stranger commits sexual abuse, which just draws attention away from the real problem of family and family friends committing abuse.

>>7723374
According to UK law, a 14 year old is neither a woman, nor nubile, and cannot agree to sex with someone over the age of 16.

They're all volunteers, doing it out of their own pocket, the fact that they're picking up anyone at all, even bottom of the barrel, is better than nothing.

>>7723432
>According to UK law, a 14 year old is neither a woman, nor nubile, and cannot agree to sex with someone over the age of 16.
yikes!

hmm, does anyone have any data (even anecdotal evidence) that these kinds of relationships are really damaging? just trying to make up my mind whether an adult having sex with a 14yo is immoral regardless of legality. it's certainly a slanted relationship and kinda iffy, but for abuse of preteens i know tons of cases and victim accounts how absolutely damaging this is. wondering if there is anything similar. like a 14yo teen agreeing to have sex with an adult stranger and being traumatised or something...

without giving it much thought, it seems other laws cover pretty much all the relevant bases - rape, battery, assault, abuse of authority - and those all apply regardless of age anyway.

>>7723481
The traditional argument is that a person under the age of consent cannot fully understand the consequences of sex and all that, or that they are unable to give consent because they are not fully rational creatures.

>>7723514
yeah, i get the formal argument, i'm more interested in empirical data. so what about sex does a 14yo not understand that all the16yos do? can you name something?
isn't 14 typically the age at which teens start facing the criminal system if they do something wrong, like shop lifting? so they're supposed to understand all the laws, but can't yet decide about their own body? that's kinda strange...

>not fully rational creatures
what a shock, even small humans are humans. who'da thunk? :-) especially when it comes to reproduction, i don't think there's even one fully rational creature on earth.

>>7709954
I getcha. I can't understand some of what he's saying. He mumbles when he's staying they charges, probably trying to confuse the targets. He's saying something like "for having sex with a 15 year old bladibladiblah."

>>7723575
Yet they're expected to make several choices that'll follow them for life.

>>7710432
A citizen's arrest is when a citizen calls an officer of the law to arrest someone. It's still done by an officer, because you're never allowed to detain someone without proper certification from the government. There are some instances where there won't be any charges, like if you're preventing a rape or murder, especially while waiting for police to show up.

>>7724092

http://findlaw.co.uk/law/government/civil_rights/500393.html
>In England and Wales, the power to detain a person suspected of involvement in criminal activity is a statutory power laid down in section 24A of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1974.

Anyone can perform a citizens arrest.

>>7709896
>"You're still going to have sex with a fourteen year old right?'
>keeps pressuring him
that guy was released a month later when the lawyers filed for police harassment and guilt by duress. Don't fuck up like that again Mr Police, you let a kiddy toucher go.

>>7726172
>a month later
>it happened only 2 weeks ago

>fatass pretending to be a cop
lmao

>Arresting guys trying to fuck teenagers
>Paki rape gangs raping dozens of actual kids go unpunished
10/10 Bongistan

Apparently some of these "pretend police" have been arrested before and have asbos. some might also be benefits frauds (no surprises there since they seen to have all the time to lure people)

>>7723166
Not an officer, just one of his thugs.

>>7710373
only the ones that dont run the country

>>7723215
how are they not?

>>7713646

nah, anyone who is trying to fuck a 14 year old via the internet deserves to lose a pint of blood from their ass

and people who hurt kids should have their limbs burned off in public.

>>7727780
Just because you weren't smart enough to consent to sex at 14 doesn't mean everyone else isn't mate :)

File: hunt.gif (1010KB, 500x245px) Image search: [Google]

1010KB, 500x245px

sigh pedo witch hunters

>>7727885

Haven't watched the film but saw a YMS review about it, I dunno if I want to watch it because the whole thing scares the living shit out of me

>>7727945
It's a very very good film, I love it for the realism

>>7717639
I think you are exaggerating and that you need to calm down.

>>7710208
How could you do that, Chris Shiflett...

>>7727536
I've seen the entire video, it is a police officer.

>>7727945
Its a great movie. If it makes you feel any better it has a happy ending

>>7727945
Great movie. Mads Mikkelsen is at his very best imo.

>>7727264
It's amazing what bullshit can come from the friends and family of the people that get picked up.

To catch a predator webms when?

http://youtu.be/1wp8KzI46X4

At least it's not like in Russia where they catch and beat homos

https://youtu.be/bpmhCZ1YSgk

https://youtu.be/zMTbFSJ_Tr4

>>7728001
not that person but even if he exaggerates on the side of things, the witch hunt is very real on the social side. Everyone immediatly becomes a SJW when pedo is involved. If you don't, you will be under suspicion, you will be stigmatised. People are crazy hysteric when it comes to pedo.

>>7715451
Well spoken indeed.

It is an medieval with hunt and it is exploited by both governments and individuals for smear campaign. Here in Germany we just had a politician destroyed by such accusations. Innocent or not, didn't matter, he was gone for good.

how dumb are these people, really

why would they risk it

>>7723374
Or the people in power linked with Jimmy Saville who are not just raping children but murdering them.

Ever think that the whole pedo-panic witch-hunt on both sides of the pond is actually more about misdirection from this and perversion of normal, healthy sexual desire? The truly sick and dangerous people are in power, they write the laws and inform your consensus of them through the media. Thus they bend the laws to protect themselves while projecting their perversion onto those they place beneath them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yApOotAuMGw

>>7710491
There is a law on grooming which this would fall under. So yes in england for that, you can citizens arrest someone

>>7731578
Based on false-logic dictating that no one below an arbitrary age has autonomy. Basically, when it benefits the state to dictate that they do not. It was very different in the past and civilizations never fell based on sexual norms allowing person who are currently defined as underage from engaging in sex with older persons.

>>7709894
>ewe're unda errest sektan ik af urr je jif bon lat jo ber kod fui durf pey cho mes tun aer DO YOU UNDERSTAND?

>>7728012
uhm, not really.

What is this, Minority Report?

>>7713815
The fact that you have any problems with a "pedo witch hunt" and you consider a 15 year old sexually mature means you're probably one of the sick fucks.
Keep crying about it until someone knocks in your door, shitlord.

>>7710216
this one is kinda fucked, like come on the girl is seventeen, if a girl were trying to go meet a twenty-six year old she met online she obviously thinks she is mature enough to have sex i just don't understand the reasoning behind the imaginary lines society draws

well this was a shit thread

>>7732072
nah bruh, the dude tried to lie and say she was 17, they got records that prove the "17 year old girl" was 14

>>7731841
dude, 15-year-olds are sexually mature. That's a fuckin fact.

These things have never made any sense to me.
I mean okay fine if you want to argue the whole underage thing I can see where you're coming from.
But these kinds of things go on for people who want to have sex with of age people. Like I know for a fact that police in my city pose as prostitutes online to catch anyone trying to pay for sex. Prostitution being illegal is mind-boggling.
It's a goddamn victimless crime like drug use and the faster victimless crimes become legal, the sooner the world will be a better place.

Like what? We're going to have fucking Walmart cartels? "Hey bruh buy our drugs we're cheaper than than HEB"
I mean brothels would create a shitton of jobs. Clerks, accountants, prostitutes, medical examiners for prostitutes + clients, etc

>>7730963
Find the vice "documentary" about pussy riot and the likes. It's good for a laugh

>>7731841
you could, *maybe*, make an argument about psychological maturity. but sexual maturity? nah, 99% of 15 year olds are sexually mature these days. and sexually active, i might add.

>>7709893
I might actually respect these guys if they'd go after the serious rapists--but if they tried that, they'd get shivved on the spot and the survivors crucified in the media and courts for anti-muslim behavior.

>>7713646
Bottom line is these men are pedo's. They are agreeing to meet underage girls which is grooming but are instead being met with arrests. (It's called a sting and after having one happen in a place that I work, they are legit).

All you are doing right now is defending a bunch of nonces by trying to blur common law and free mans law.

Stop.

>>7731655
>blah blah blah
stfu

>>7709912
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wpPswkAhrk
hes a chief inspector now

>>7717609
Yep, off Greenwich high Street.

>>7717380
Protip: If you don't want to be labeled as a pedophile, don't meet up with underage women to have sex

/thread

>>7734295
what is that from?

>>7736217
did you not fucking read his post you mouthbreathing retard?

>>7732429
>crucified in the media and courts for anti-muslim behavior

lol'd

>>7709896
LOL! Fat fuck

>>7710216
>how old's the girl you came here to meet
>visibly thinks about what age he should say

>>7713646
>as a lawfag from the continent

What country?

>>7717639
#MensRights

The whole concept of "statutory rape" is based on the faulty premise that women can ever be emotionally mature.

>>7727567
ICEBURN!

File: three birds fighting over a peanut.webm (3MB, 636x360px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 636x360px

lmao at this thread

>W-witch hunt ;___;
>M-minority report ;____;
>Th-thought crimes ;________;

How to tell someone is a pedophile in two words or less.

#NotAllPedos

>>7732072
Shut up you dumb cunt, they said that she's 14.

File: He said she said.webm (904KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

904KB, 320x240px

>>7732072
If you look closely he takes a few seconds to come up with her age. He knew what he was doing.

>>7736482
Nice job reinforcing their point.

>>7736509
>accosted by 3 big angry men
>mind goes blank

She said she was 17.

>>7732072
seventeen would be legal in the UK.

>>7731841
>you have a problem with a witch hunt hence, you are a witch.

They have a Facebook page Unknown TV caught around 30 people in a month, civilian arrest doesn't require I.D pages nor is it entrapment.

>>7736532
The key difference is that witchcraft isn't (and shouldn't be) a crime.

A literal witch hunt--i.e., hunting witches--is an act of bigotry and intolerance.

If you refer to hunting pedophiles as a "witch hunt", you're basically saying that you don't believe pedophilia should be a crime.

Isn't it a well known fact, that the police is only able to arrest you, if you've already done it? They cant catch poeple like this, because they didn't do anything yet. This poeple are probably doing it in their spare just for the cause, preventing things like this in an unusual but probably effective way.

I've been wondering, though. Wouldn't these civilians be, like, accomplices of the crime for encouraging the other guy into pedosex, so they could go and arrest them because they can?

>>7736600
At least they're putting the fear of God into these pedo scum by publically shaming them.

>>7736544
>you're basically saying that you don't believe pedophilia should be a crime.

Of course "pedophilia" shouldn't be a crime. It's not something you do. It's something that is in your brain.

The word you're going for is child molestation.

>>7736625
no, in fact the guys they trick often end up with jail time

>>7724092
in Canada anyone can make an arrest.

>>7736717
So, they don't really care if the guys they trick into it even had any criminal records? They catch innocent people who may give in to, let's say, curiosity, assuming they will become future child predators?

That's kind of fucked up.

>>7736755
>innocent
They're guilty of online grooming.

>>7736760
Oh, yes. I'll give you that.

>>7736755
It doesn't matter if the child they think they're hooking up with is real or not, it's a crime to attempt the hookup in the first place.

>>7736714
>The word you're going for is child molestation.
...Which is the crime these men are attempting to commit. Are you retarded?

Do you also think people shouldn't be arrested for attempted burglary, since the crime only happened in their brain?

>>7736766
No, that's entrapment in lots of places in the world including lots of states in the US and is illegal. It's why the 'to catch a predator' show eventually shut down. They got sued hard by someone who killed themself after they got caught on the show in a state where entrapment is illegal.

>>7713646

I also thought it feels abit like entrapment but when someone drink drives and gets pulled over they get charged- even if they haven't killed someone while drunk yet. If these guys have the mental issues that make a grown man want to fuck a child then imo better to weed them out and lock them away for the deficient human beings they are than wait for them to commit the crime. Some people dont deserve justice, some people are simply burdens on our society and we should practice some social Darwinism for the greater good.

>>7736893
how can yo sue someone when you're dead?

fucking idiot

>>7736938
Epic m8. I meant his family sued.

>202 replies
>13 images omitted

Love you guys

>>7731780
yes

>>7736262
nymphomaniac. It's a movie

>>7731655
keep justifying your predilection for tweens, you filthy cunt.

>>7736760
>>No crime actually committed? Quick! Invent a new crime based on assumption that teenagers have no idea what they are doing and will be irrevocably harmed by sex!

You know, because that makes so much sense and it isn't used as a dog-and-pony-show/five-minute-hate while the demonstrable monsters run rampant: >>7731524

When do they get a sting-operation and when are you going to realize that there is a difference between what you have been conditioned to consider child abuse and molestation and a witch-hunt that has been engineered in recent times against a normal aspect of human sexual behavior?

As was pointed out here: >>7731655
There is no historical or sociological basis to support the conception that allowing persons currently defined as underage does actual harm to them or society as a whole. You can look at nations and states with lower ages of consent for further confirmation of this. The Pedo-panic Witch-hunt however does, as it is being used as a distraction from truly horrifying and systematic abuse and victimization of children. While promoting a paranoid, oppressive and abetting a police-state. You shouldn't let your emotions be manipulated into misdirection from actual harming of children and socially sanctioned hatred of others. Also note that It's not only men who engage in this behavior, you need only look up how many female teachers have been caught sleeping with teenage students to be aware of that.

File: jjjpound.gif (248KB, 400x255px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 400x255px

I WANT MORE WEBMS

>>7713815
If you actually think a 15 year has the mental capacity to make sound, logical, and mature decisions you're a fucking retard, trying to justify your own sick self, or you're 15 yourself.

>>7737382
get outta here pedo apologist

>>7710373
>>7727567

Same thing all over the world, if you're a normal guy and fuck a 16 year old your going to get raped in jail daily, but if you are pot of the elite you can have 12 year old orgy parties with all of your hollywood buddies.

>>7736867
he's right though. you don't get arrested for "kleptomania". you get arrested for attempted burglary, which is a physical act, not a thought-crime. in a thread all about whether this is a witch hunt or not, that distinction matters. pedophilia as the mental state of being attracted to children isn't and shouldn't be a crime.
you are also confused what constitutes an attempt. if you only plan a crime in your head, this is not illegal. it only turns into an attempt if you start preparations. most attempted crimes are where you've done everything to constitute the crime except you weren't successful (eg you held someone up at gunpoint and demanded money - they just didn't have any). if your concept of criminal attempts was true, everyone would be in jail for attempted murder, since everyone has thought to themselves "I'll fucking kill that guy" once in a while.

>child molestation

>>7737501
>pot of the elite
>pot

>>7737448
i don't. some do have the capacity, but generally no. but the same is true for an 18yo. and most pampered 25yos for that matter. yet the day miss airhead turns 18 she's fair game for fucking up her life with porn.

all i'm saying is, that 15yo are closer to 18yo than to 8yo when it comes to mental capacity. and curiously enough the law recognises that. 15yo teens can make more decisions without their guardian. they are criminally liable. if an 8yo steals shit, nothing will happen. if a 15yo steals shit, they'll go to juvenile court. so the law *does* think they are capabale of sound decisions, otherwise it would be the biggest injustice of all time to punish someone who can't make sound decisions for their unsound decisions.

the icing on the cake are the cases i cited: a 17yo makes explicit nude selfies and sends them to a couple of friends. she just manufactured and distributed child porn and will have to face the courts for that. so the law explicitly says: you are too young to make sound decisions about your body. but we can punish you for any unsound decisions you make. that ain't right! there should never be a responsibility without capability.

>>7736276
>implying you wouldn't have the call to prove he told you to go there
>implying anyone would go to those lengths for a "prank"
>Implying there would be more evidence against you than your friend
>implying calling someone a mouthbreathing retard makes you sound older than 10
>implying anyone is offended by being insulted of the internet
>implying
>implying
>implying
>implying
>implying
>implying

>>7738210
>implying you wouldn't have the call to prove he told you to go there
>implying anyone would go to those lengths for a "prank"
>Implying there would be more evidence against you than your friend

ah, but this is where you go wrong. if the police arrests you, you can say "but look at all the evidence i've got - i was set up!". and if it checks out, they'll apologize and let you go. an all the while they'll treat you right, because there is a proper redress against unlawful arrests.

with these vigilante retards though, you can say "but look at all the evidence i've got - i was set up!" all you want, but they'll just go "yeah right" and upload the video, ruining you forever. it's not a problem if officials crack down on criminals within the rule of law. the trouble starts with amateurs excercising horrific power with little care and consideration.

>>7737431
youtube "dark justice". there is another group that do these kind of stuff

>>7709893
>guys are literally just standing in a public area
>allegedly there to solicit sexual activity with a minor
>allegedly
>can't prove anything
>literally cannot prove anything at all
>cannot be charged
>exercise in futility

>>7736482
that webm made this thread worthwhile.
bird is duking like no tommorrow

>>7730426
hahaha pretty gewd, the creator could have panned the vocals a bit to blend more with the scene but good concept

>>7736867
You're retarded.
Pedophilia isn't the same thing as attempted burglary. It's like saying thinking about murder means attempted murder. One implies a thought, the other an action.

>>7738448
Read the whole thread.

>>7738548
No, YOUR'RE retarded....
That is a TERRIBLE metaphor. It would be more like if you thought about murdering someone so you set up a meeting with a contract killer and the cops met you instead of the hitman. You have already decided to go through with the crime, they are just preventing it from happening.

....and yes I know the guys in the clips aren't cops, just making an example.

>>7715037
>>7709954
>>7713386
>>7709965
>>7710538
"you're under arrest.....blah.....section 15.....chu undahstand what dat means?"

>>7738286
>Sue for slander once proven innocent
>???
>Literal Profit

File: 1436033121223.gif (1MB, 480x204px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 480x204px

>>7738286

>>7738286
>being caught taking the offer for sex by a (fake) minor is entrapment
It really isn't.

>>7717712
I think when you get out of your little egalitardian bubble you'll find it is the 'anti-racists' who are blind.

>>7730963
mmmmmmmmm wheres the video where they make the guy rape his hole with a bottle? I love that one

>>7730963
>take that
>guy tries to kick poof
>falls on his ass

kek. Russians are fags

File: sway.gif (990KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

990KB, 500x281px

>>7720472
>pretend to be X.

I'm pretty sure unless you are legalised to do so none of this will hold up in court.

>>7737479
>>Apparently not at all concerned with persons in positions of power sadistically abusing and murdering children. Then using their political connections to cover it up and get away with it on an organized basis.
>>Calls others a pedo apologist.

How about you come up with a sound and logical argument to disprove the points being raised or you get out?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUcw7XIWISI

MUST WATCH^^^^^

>>7739457
Better:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcU7FaEEzNU

Also worth reading:

http://www.cracked.com/personal-experiences-1658-5-ways-were-making-pedophilia-worse.html

>>7726172
>a month later when it literally only just happened a couple of days ago

kek

>>7709893
Does every pedophile in England get approached by a fat fuck whom they could easily run from?