R8 the logo

>>316154
could be worse marcos
not a logo though

also, add an S to hack
marcos hack sounds like marcos is a hack which is far far away from the edgy cool you are aiming for

Thanks for the feedback

if its not a logo how can you call it

>>316158
Thats old technique. Welcone to the new generatio. Where a brand doesnt ever need to have a physical element.
We're not faxing logos anymore grandpa.
Look at popular youtube channels and websites

>>316176
It's not about physical elements, it's about versatility - those neon sign effects would look like shit in any other context, and now you've pigeonholed your brand into only ever being about that one aesthetic. To use your example of a YouTuber, imagine partnering or doing a crossover with another channel and telling them they have literally zero creative freedom in how they brand featured content because everything has to revolve around making sure your logo still looks presentable.

You sound like the kind of kid who makes logos in Photoshop then when the client requests a reversed vector, tells them to fuck off because "it's good enough already."

>>316160
title plate?

>>316176
>/gd/=/fa/
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=gestalt+visual+perception+theory

File: 8RiTGXy13ybIjMLBFBu8nLjLbOJwkajCw0kETbLMse3Nvv3OBaf47TBfsh9D6cecxA=w300.png (111KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 300x300px

>>316176
>Look at popular youtube channels and websites
Google popular youtube channels to disprove your nonsense since I can think of day9 and kripp having real logos
Get a top 10. never heard of number 2 before
img search it
>picrelated
Are you fucking kidding me?
>a brand doesnt ever need to have a physical element
nor graphic elements apparently