Our company Agricultural distributor. we distributes chemicals for crops. so I'm not really that kind of a creative guy. so Im here so that if some of you can help me improve.
- it looks like 2 logos in one.
- why is their a gradient/bevel emboss on just the left side of the logo and no where else?
- why is the G touching the W?
- why is a chunk of the bottom left of the second A missing?
overall pretty bad, just hire a designer. when your logo looks like shit your company looks like shit.
You can hire one of us for a redesign or consultation, or leave.
>>313587
That is pure aids, I would love to work on a logo for an agricultural chemical company though so hire me.
Full-time Graphic Designer here.
Like >>313590 said, there are two logos in one. i give one critique for each.
>SHORT LOGO
The bevel emboss effect looks as if you did it manually but fucked it up with abusing the shit out of gradient, making it look like something from 00's Newgrounds. Even less do I like the aligment of the AG that leaves so little white space, almost touching the grey circle with horrendous bevel emboss. Plus, it's not even rendered that well, the gradient is skewed and edges pixellated. All in all, using gradient in a logo is bad taste and renders logo almost unusable in black&white.
>LONG LOGO
Portions of letter most letters are cut away, for what purpose? It's done randomly and probably you dis this on random. The "Chemicals Corporation" is too close to the obove one. Kerning could be tighter etc. Also the green should be little lighter, preferrably a Pantone color.
I have to apologize though, at first I thought somebody did this for you, that's why I was so critical, then I changed it half-way through. Leaf element on top of Y is the only design choice that could be improved upon.
In summary, you are better off just hiring a designer. Don't go to one of those Fiverr hacks, go to a decent designer and get a good job done with a proper PDF containing color code, font, different variations etc.
Logo is an important part of the company's identity. Despite my criticism (important to convince you that you NEED a designer for this), I wish you luck!
>>313587
?
>>313612
not OP but looks nice
>>313612
can that icon be any fucking taller.
>>313612
thats really bad
>>313612
... a thumbprint inside a lollipop?
... a radar emitting balloon?
... a vibrating douche?
what am I actually looking at here?
There's a Critique & Feedback thread already, motherfucker.
>>312369
Do you think I wouldn't prefer having a whole thread for my logo? Huh???
If only I had you in front of me, dude... I would knock your fucking teeth out and cut your throat.
Think before you post, buddy. Think before you post.