Hey /gd/
What do you thinhk about my logo design? It's for a photography studio mainly doing mystic, dark and surreal pictures.
>>302352
those grainy stroke looks disgusting as fuck, gon be horrid when scaled down.
Looks good as is, but scaling down will make details very hard to see.
Also this picture looks upresed and if you want to make a logo I'd recommend making it really big then afterwards downscaling a copy of it to the required size.
>>302352my version is not perfect, but when it comes to logo, always, ALWAYS keep it simple.
>>302449
I associate it with an optometrician… 0_o
maybe make it look more like a camera?
>>302352
Looks a little pretentious, but I like it.
>>302444
I got rid of the grainy lines and it indded simplified the design.
>>302821
Like an aperture? I purposely didn't do that. It's way too cliché.
>>302446
We are talking about stuff like this. I made it for a smithy last year. Most of my clients expect all sort of crazy shit from me.
>>302838
that's an example of where your logo would be bro
put your wip into where it would show up and judge it there instead of with some edgy smoke
about the logo itself? fine lineart won't work best here, mess with stroke weight
ignore the memes above
i would also suggest at least "one" way to identify you're a photographer, this eye thing means nothing to me rn
Reminds me of meyerist logo on The Path, but I got a different question
What kind of clients does that kind of photography studio get? Fashion?