Hi, I just want to git gud at graphic design, so I made this

File: 9ab1134226298557c6ce152d8c8jpg.jpg (40KB, 780x554px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 780x554px

>>300933
whenever i see stuff like that i always remember this quote:
work you didn't sell ia no better than work you didn't do.
although i don't necessarily agree with it.
back to the logo, i don't think there's a need for using two lines of text make it one line and use lowercase on all the letters 'flatlime' perhaps with a bold type for the 'lime' part if it doesn't look good pick a better font and the lime seems a little boring imho it could be way more interesting without losing it's flat-ness (eg. a cool gradient/gradient-mesh, an interesting shadow underneath, some shiny reflections or pores etc.)

File: flat_lime_edit.png (2MB, 1600x1600px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1600x1600px

Ok, so I followed your advice and added cardboard (Because cardboard solves everything) and it looks way better, thanks anon :)

File: flatlime.jpg (39KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 1366x768px

I'd use another font (not saying that the one I chose is the right one) and I'd stretch the space between caracters. Font a little bolder, it's a logo, it should be remarkable! I agree with previous response

File: lmao.png (37KB, 732x762px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 732x762px

>>300933

lamo

It's funny the amounts of things this logo can cover.

>>300945
Think about which part of the word "flatlime" is emphasised, "flat" or "lime"? Personally because I'd put emphasis on "flat", emphasise it on your logo like in >>300939
As for the rest, I think it's pretty nice for a minimalist design