How is this?

>>287270
>political incorrect
Politically incorrect.

>>287271
looks like barbara kruger
and fix dat typo man

also, center the damn text

>>287270
>politicallyincorrect.png
>POLITICAL INCORRECT /POL/
nice

File: politically incorrect.jpg (597KB, 1184x1177px) Image search: [Google]

597KB, 1184x1177px

here's a free design

File: whatever.jpg (81KB, 878x523px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 878x523px

what i the purpose?

>>287282
makes no sense. also right arrows are too closely resembling Hillary's logo, not the best representation of pol

File: Screenshot 2016-10-31 20.54.02.png (41KB, 1500x192px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 1500x192px

Consider changing that typo to something more striking, such as Radikal

>>287270
Why not

/POL/ POLITICALLY INCORRECT

I mean either way is fucking retarded to read but still.
It feels weird having both of them right next to each other like that. There needs to be a separation, but it still needs to feel grouped.

>>288372
it's based on italian futurism, the art mouvement of benito musolini's regime

File: 984.jpg (174KB, 495x372px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 495x372px

>>288372
we need to use other fascist movements outside of the nazis, Hitler had really shitty tastes

File: Untitled-1.png (594KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

594KB, 500x500px

>>287270

>>287270
Stupid and childish?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p86BPM1GV8M

>>288646
>implying futurism isn't shit
>implying classical contemporary style of the Nazis isn't better than anything the blackshits shat out.
>implying any fascist regime will have good art

>>287282
The leftmost arrow looks fucked up. Other than that, you just applied a silly effect to an already mediocre image.

>>289100
Red filter has been done too many times before for this for it to be original, but it's the only non-ugly thing in this thread. The underage Nazis really make it applicable to /pol/ too. Great job.

>>289240
>classical contemporary style of the Nazis
it's called Neoclassical, retard

>>287270
It's uncompromising, flat, offensive, authoritarian and an ugly piece of shit. 10\10 logo.

File: kruger_00131.jpg (293KB, 700x455px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 700x455px

>>289100
looks nice, reminds me of barbara kruger

>>289240
>implying nazi neo-neo-classical shit is any better
well they'll never have anything good, but at lest it won't look like the gay shit hitler peddled, idolizing naked statues of stronk menz ja

>>289295
So that's where Supreme nicked their logo from

File: 1478789516480.png (53KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 1000x1000px

>>289584
this is slightly cleaner. please excuse poor quality, just used as a fast concept on my phone

>>289598
yeah pretty much

File: Pol white house jpg.jpg (718KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

718KB, 1200x1200px

opinions ?

>>290291
wow

>>290291
maybe try to put in similar grain on the trump section as the rest of the photo. Looks good overall. The clash of textures is a little jarring at the bottom.

>>290527
If the 'IN' was "added later", why is there space for it? Shouldn't 'CORRECT' be centered?

>>289598
yep, she ended up hitting them with a lawsuit, but it was setlted

File: 1479139087774 (1).jpg (3MB, 1403x1403px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1403x1403px

>>290035
maybe

The OP is the only logo that works to a degree the rest are abysmal

>>289240
The nazi literally forced Renner to flee germany for his premodern typographie.

Adolf literally banned all non-neoclassical typography as subversive to germany, you are a literal retard if you admire nazi graphic design