Can someone please explain how are these intro's made?

>>281397
Any 3D suite. but why would you make this shit?

>>281397
>>281411
This. Also if you're making an intro, don't. Just put an overlay of your logo at the beginning of the actual video and have it fade out after a couple seconds. Intros are obnoxious and don't instantly make you look professional (especially if you use an online service to make one like this kid did).

File: ok.png (37KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 1024x1024px

>>281414
i second this

>>281414
>>281411
>>281418

It's not going to impress anyone, like these people said.

>>281425
>>281414
Are you guys stupid -_-. to all of you blind readers where did i said i want to make such intro for some channel of mine? Stupid jerks.. all i wanted to know was how are such effects created with all the 3D stuff and perfect camera movements.. next time STFU if you don't know how to actually reply with some sense

>>281494
its like babys first 3d. download cinema 4d and do some greyscalegorilla tutorials

>>281494
Did you even read your own post?
>Can someone please explain how are these intro's made?
The only mention of 'effects' is in 'after effects'

>>281397
Blender

>>281572
Not Blender. Blender internal or cycles render mode isnt this advanced. Even as a blender user myself, I must say that 3DMax is far more advanced in every way possible than Blender.

>>281592
You're joking right? This shit is easy as fuck in blender.

It's just a camera spinning around 3d text. Some static particles around the subject.
The little pulse can be done with a texture on a plane, and keyframing the transparency with a circular gradient mask.
The flash is just a lamp moving across the scene.

It's not that blender's not advanced, you're just not thinking well enough.
If you can't figure out something this easy, I'd suggest looking at some more tutorials.

>>281601
You don't even need to use cycles for this.