4CC

File: 1468969601730.png (3MB, 2400x7250px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2400x7250px

There were the options, pic in OP won

>>277455
It aint bad.

>>277456
>D
what the fuck

the rays of the sun look more like hair than fire but I do like the idea. hate the stroke on the text and I hate the fact that the sun has a drop shadow and the (I'm assuming) water has a white stroke. the soccer ball looks decent i guess from what I can see.

overall, not the worst logo I've seen but definitely should of been revised. it looks like whoever made it made that version without considering any criticism or feedback on fine tuning it then just submitted it and hoped for the best. not that im giving that person shit for doing that because im pretty sure everybody whose made a logo at some point has done that but yeah, needs to be beat up more. as for the other ones?

A1- kind of an eye sore, lazy typography, stroke is too thick imo.

F1- seems like it could be good if the typography got beat up a little bit more maybe? kind of sloppy line work at some points too.

R- pretty shitty. lazy effort, shitty text, ugly stroke, horrible kerning.

G- i feel like the idea has potential but it was poorly executed. just sloppy with the line work and shapes plus the soccer ball has no unity to the rest of the graphic. its almost too much going on too as a whole but i like the movement in it with some of the line work. had potential for sure.


C- not horrible. typography could use work but the background graphic is pretty clean so thats good

H1- same as the one I critiqued before essentially. really hate that font choice.

D- stands for dog shit

E- kind of bland looking. lazy execution. not necessarily a bad logo but boring to look at.

Is the leaf football some kind of tradition so it has to be included or something, why is it necessary, it looks awful.