Something I pulled up in a couple of mins, it's a logo for

>>262169
Surprisingly, I'm intrigued.

It's stupid, and very simple, but it's definitely unique.

I'm not a fan of the font you chose, but the simple "Agh! A penis!" graphic is eye catching, and certainly unique from other adult offerings.

>>262171
Thank you

i love it
Very post-industrial

File: 1458366632959.jpg (55KB, 1440x1550px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1440x1550px

Another one, just posting ideas

>>262183
Boring.

Try to use a very fancy font

I like the first idea, you have to work on it

File: Untitled-1.jpg (78KB, 953x304px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 953x304px

>>262169

>>262218
Interesting, very subtle but well made

>>262226
>subtle
I aren't think that.

No.

Absolutely no one (in terms of real volume, you'll probably net 2 sales a month from cheap shut ins) is going to buy sex toys from a company with such lazy and juvenile branding. The most successful adult toy companies in the world employ branding with a message of sophistication and luxury. The exception is fleshlight, and that's a privilege they enjoy only because they've cornered the market on pocket pussies. And even then, their logo isn't a fucking dick, it's a modern looking wordmark.

Purchasing sex toys is something people are taking more seriously now that they can easily and discreetly order them online. Why would they choose a retailer that treats the product like some middle school joke when they could order from another company with a sense of quality and class?

I don't really even want you to take my advice. If this was your serious attempt at a brand identity, you deserve nothing more than failure that is more embarrassing than your concept.

And unless you're samefagging the shit out of this thread, the idiots encouraging this garbage idea should be positively fucking ashamed.

>>262256
No u

>>262256
Then what, instead of a dick?

>>262258
If this question isn't /gd/ in a fucking nutshell.

>I can't think of anything other than what's obvious and stupid, somebody have an idea for me.

>>262256

> unless you're samefagging the shit out of this thread, the idiots encouraging this garbage idea should be positively fucking ashamed.

Calm down, hombre. I'm pretty sure none of us who aren't OP actually took this seriously, or believed that someone starting a business would actually think that that was a favorable logo.

This is another bait thread, and they either go in two directions: Hate, or mock-encouragement.

Also, who cares? If OP actually is starting a sex toy store, and does go ahead putting out a shitty logo with a horrendous typeface, and then looses his shirt, what's it to you? Another greenhorn becomes an example of what happens when you take advice from jerks on 4Chan.

>>262256
Haha, way to take things too seriously, you must be a fun guy to be around. Jesus man, calm down and take a breath once in a while.

>>262256
>newfags take the b8

Graphic design masterpiece
10 dicks/10
Would fap again.