Aesthetically speaking, rate

>>244645
looks like you upscaled an icon, quality is terrible

looks like mspaint level cropping

0/10 its genuinely awful

File: image.jpg (716KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

716KB, 2048x1536px

>>244646
>I dream scoped the same pic thru a bunch of diff filters
>used pic stitch multiple times
>filled the the boarder with a pic I had edited in doodleyou
original pic attached

>>244645
Shit tier drug
Shit tier image

>>244646
>>244648
I'm sorry I forgot to mention a local DJ paid me $2,000 for that image on his next album

>>244649
Haha I know, I have friends who do real work like this and he was just like "damn, I want that on my new shit coming out how much?" I said "2?" Like 200 he was like "good deal" and pulled out two stacks

>>244651
Fascinating...

>>244645

-10/10

Incredibly ugly and amateur.

>>244645
I'm not sure to understand. The final design is the whole picture ? or the tiny ones are juste studies ?

Honestly, I don't know where to start. It looks like a blind retarded child made it. Fucking whack.

tumblr/10

File: image.jpg (88KB, 1159x788px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 1159x788px

There was effort here, but there are too many conflicting colors. The eye doesn't know where to look

File: hank.png (61KB, 219x200px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 219x200px

Great Scott.

>>244645
Depending on what this is being made to represent, this is either REALLY GOOD or REALLY SHIT.

It's unlikely there is any in between with that design. Is it for a harsh noise album? If so, then holy shit yes. But for example, that would be a really shitty christian rock album cover.

>>244645
looks like baby's first experience with photoshop filters