ITT: share your best so far. https://www.behance.net/galler

>>241837
>https://www.behance.net/gallery/30992941/Switch-16-Brand-design
terrible grammar. kill yourself

>>241837
>Best
Wow OP, you've really set the bar low for yourself haven't you.
#UgliestLogoEver

This is my best! https://www.behance.net/gallery/28278007/Alaska-Coffee-Roastery-Logo

>>241919
im sorry hun

File: Screen Shot 2015-11-06 at 14.15.01.png (68KB, 369x147px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 369x147px

>>241837
holy fuck did you get a lobotomy

otherwise it's solid.

One ugly complex Logo, Identity Elements that do not correspond, Vector Puke, a Swastika in the Imagery and plus a ton of generic Hipster Faggot Mockups. On Top this pile of Crap is sold to me with flamboyant Copy full of mistakes. What is this Brand about? And why do you think it's good?

>>241997
I agree with above poster minus the swastika thing. I never knew it was a prominent symbol in hinduism too.

other than that though, OP has 0 type skills. not even kidding. the logo is pretty bad too.

1/10, would ask for refund

>>241919
this is not a bad idea at all, but the execution is pretty poor. the font you used is very clumsy. the coffee vector is messy and needs a lot of cleaning.

4/10 polish it up and find a decent font

>>241837
-5/10 i hate to use those mockups from now.

>>241919
7/10
Good stuff there.

>>241863
>>241907
>>241997
>>242009
>>242032
Sorry to disappoint you guys. I'll work on this whole thing again. I'll reduce my typos and I'll try to make logo symmetric, thanks a lot.

>>241837
OP Please we can't compete with that.

>>242033
Here OP, 11 steps to stop sucking such dick.
https://www.behance.net/gallery/12463667/11-STEPS-TO-A-PERFECT-LOGO

File: cd28f612463667.56269e5b5ac4a.png (90KB, 1240x826px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 1240x826px

>>242050
>> using equilateral triangle to prove complicated point.

Nonsense.

>>241837
your work is defiantly improving, but you still need to go long way.

File: heresatip.jpg (80KB, 1111x634px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1111x634px

>>242033
good to see you're trying to improve OP. Here's what you can start with.

File: 1418366300589s.jpg (3KB, 125x121px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 125x121px

>>242079

Thankyou.

>>241972
Can't be all that bad. I thought it came out good and I got $350 from it.

File: 1366878880786.jpg (15KB, 250x238px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 250x238px

>>242097
Hindi guy:
>I gladly accept your harsh criticism and will do my best to improve

Amurrishit:
>I don't see anything wrong with it bruh, the money I got for it proves this is quality work

>>242097
client's are usually plebs, they don't know what's good. there are some issues with your design, functionally it's not really adaptable to situations further than large format signage.

>>242100
This nigga knows whats going on..

File: Screen Shot 2015-11-20 at 10.45.14 AM.png (182KB, 1280x607px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 1280x607px

>>242097
>>241919

Hey man I don't if you're here but... I think you should really drop out for this for-profit uni you're at right no. Please understand I am not trying to be insulting, I am not an amazing graphic designer either.

But pic related is not a normal school project. It is clearly not normal that a design teacher lets you, a web design major studying in America, put this in your portfolio as a final project. You are clearly being deceived, and whoever accompanied you in this design process clearly failed to do his job and should not receive any tuition salary for it. This goes for many other projects in your protflio.

H-hope you can get out of this crap bro