Archived threads in /gd/ - Graphic Design - 59. page

these are all in the public domain
https://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary

>>302364
Imho, it looks like there's too much going on in the image. People love minimalist logos for a reason...

>>302364

waaay to much clutered!
simplify to what you actually need. what is important about the roman figure that can drive the message home?

>>302352
those grainy stroke looks disgusting as fuck, gon be horrid when scaled down.

>>302352
>>302444
I wouldn't put that way, but he's right. The details get lost… think again about Photography and Mysticism and BE SIMPLE, MUCH SIMPLER. But also think about your client, what do they expect from your photo studio and the photos you shoot?

Looks good as is, but scaling down will make details very hard to see.

Also this picture looks upresed and if you want to make a logo I'd recommend making it really big then afterwards downscaling a copy of it to the required size.

Yes.

Well, take an extremely low res image, stretch it to a larger size document. Add a red color overlay with a low opacity. Then download a lense flair stock image, transform it to fit where you want it and you're done.

>>302178
You do know Photoshop has an actual lens flare tool, right???

Also what >>302297 said in that you can take a low res image (or make it lower res yourself by resizing it, saving it, then making it big again) but if you want it to have a lot of artifacting your best bet is probably to save the image on lowest quality possible several times until you feel it looks good

>>301954
https://www.google.ru/search?q=art+deco+font&num=100&newwindow=1&source=lnms&tbm=isch

>>301955
Some of them are art nouveau though

>>301955

This doesn't really answer my question. I know what the fonts used look like and of course I already tried to find an answer to my question. I'm looking for a more concise textbook answer.

You really don't understand licensing, so you, anon?

>>301018
Do you* (fucking auto-correct)

>>301018
I do, but again it's their burden to prove that it's been copied by them. If I change it and claim it to be mine, then they can't really do jack shit can they?

There's this thing called Google Images.

>>302759
Yeah, can't find shit without buying from Shutterstock

If you just need a reference, doesn't matter if it's shutterstock. Download the free comp and do the fucking work to redraw, tweak, etc and make it unique to your project.

>>302464
too long to explain, you'll just need to learn the basics.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLHWlAm0PiQ

>>302471
thanks for the link

Learn face swapping techniques, learn how to track footage efficiently in After Effects, track your source and destination and mask/colorbalance the source footage to match the destination, use lots of nulls so you can do fine adjustment when needed.

File: Screen Shot 2017-03-16 at 14.51.47.png (32KB, 738x282px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 738x282px

the shape is supposed to spell the initials of the name (bon voyage), and the whole thing together is supposed to sorta look like a plane

i see it dude but maybe you need to add at least like cockpit windows so it's more immediately recognisable as a plane

also maybe un-rotate the text? i understand ur jig but shitty readers will have to twist their necks n shit, play around with it a little, maybe a modern typeface would be worth trying if you opened up the character spacing by a bit

overall a nice concept but be more confident in showing it instead of being so vague

>>301993
i'll add the cockpit windows to make it more like a plane as soon as i get home and i'll see how it looks then, and i'll try putting the text below the logo and see how that goes.

what kind of typeface would you recommend? i've been looking through font sites for the past 2 days and i feel like my mind is just a bunch of neatly organised letters at this point .
&thanks for the feedback obv

Try /g/

>stolen parts

Do you understand what a design is ?

>>301960
>Do you understand what a design is ?
No. What is it?

i know intel have used it in some of their advertising

Bleeding Cowboys but for the love of god don't use it.

thank you, its a client of mines logo. He wants it updated he likes the 'T'' and yes the font is bad. Just wanted the font to show him it against other fonts in black/white. Thanks alot for the reply

you're kidding right?

look at the date, this is from 1972, it's probably hand-painted

I'm sure you could achieve something similar by making a 4 color process and playing with levels and grain

or you can get some paint and do it by hand

>>302494
>get some paint

it's obviously silk-screened

File: The-Range-WEB_1500.jpg (3MB, 1500x2318px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1500x2318px

>>302494
Yea, I'm sorry. I should've been more clear about wanting to find a way to produce something similar to Otl Aicher's posters, but digitally. I'll try your suggestion. Ultimately, I just want to know how something like this can be done through Photoshop.

No.

I found someone.

>>302376
charcoal brush + 90 degrees in color wheel = 90s

>>302404
>90 degrees
>90s

Do you think this is a coincidence or was a graphic designer making a joke that caught on?

>>302404
But 90° is chartreuse green, not azure or cyan.

Sorry it's actually behance.net

>>302153
3/10, pretty bad, read some books on design and try to imitate the quality of people who are getting paid for similar stuff.

Take a look at behance, Pinterest, etc for some examples of effective cigarette packaging. Use them as inspiration.

>>301840
is your project to design a building?

>>301840
>>301848
>>301922
As an architect, please be more vague

>>301840
>>301848
>>301922
>>301994
>As an architect, please be more vague
as a post architect, please be vaguer