Archived threads in /gd/ - Graphic Design - 31. page

It's a colorspace issue, definitely. Your video is in video rather than PC luminance space.

If you fix it for your configuration, it will instead be overbloomed/crushed for anyone using video luminance space (so most default configurations connected with an HDMI cable.)

>>311872
How can i fix this in photoshop export settings? 'Cause i worked both pieces (image and video) in the same workspace and saved each one as individual files for animation.

>>311866
What encode settings are you using on your video?
If you are using the same color space it should be an issue with your video output, prolly due to compression.
Try exporting to something lossless (or close) like ProRes 422HQ or QuickTime Animation

http://mac.brothersoft.com/pdf2id-professional.html

it's called google.

Thanks for your help, i am looking for one of the last version compatible with indesign CC :)

Also, the link for download is going to a 404 page

Forgot to post the link to the first one
Will paterson - https://www.youtube.com/user/breakdesignsco

File: Screen Shot 2017-06-19 at 2.06.58 PM.png (572KB, 1698x1246px) Image search: [Google]

572KB, 1698x1246px

Second favourite - Graphic Tweakz

www.youtube.com/channel/UCoY6V4cYFCVKJXEdSEywjoQ

File: Designer sketch.png (1MB, 1678x1082px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1678x1082px

Third favourite - Designer sketch

www.youtube.com/channel/UCDUBN0Zeou0FVaoaAlqgHQA

File: apart3.png (30KB, 904x871px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 904x871px

>>311383
V2

File: Untitled-1.png (323KB, 2000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 2000x3000px

are those effects overkill? should I give volume to the letters too? am I stuck in 2010?

>>311692
Second one best. Those effects are way overkill

>>310535
Don't

>>310535
illustrator, blend.

Loads of tutorials on it but its old af

SHAWN MENDES

Wow. Fucking gorgeous

I wont be spending these, just gonna keep them in a frame...

They look like church pamphlets. Not saying that's a bad thing - I'm just pointing it out.

File: e261e3a13d533247b50b67a8176853523399c9dd[1].jpg (442KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

442KB, 1280x720px

Another

File: wallhaven-468044[1].jpg (327KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

327KB, 1200x1200px

Another

vaporwave

File: 41.png (339KB, 684x580px) Image search: [Google]

339KB, 684x580px

Multimedia > graphic design

>>310778
Tell me more about multimedia.

>>310778
>"Multimedia" major
literally a fake degree

>>309989
Hmmmmmmm

>>309989
The first one is so fucking lit, why did they move away from that.

>>309996
what if we make a hashtag to change it back to that one and spam the fuck out of ubisoft with it?

>>311626
What is, "Suicide boy" genre of music?

gothrap/underground

File: dick.png (551KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

551KB, 500x500px

here's another I made, it's kinda the same style. For some reason I love symmetry. This is a metal bands cover

>>311435
Well their logo cost $15. You expect them to hire a UX/UI designer that isnt still researching if they need to go to school or not for their field?

File: DCX7H6KV0AAgI-_.png (196KB, 568x489px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 568x489px

It's genuine trash for a whole multitude of reasons, allow me to go on an autistic rant why.

>Profile pictures are now circles
This looks so fucking bad if you made a profile picture around the square, because it doesn't reformat your picture into a circle, it crops it. Look what it did to Microsoft's logo on twitter before they changed it to fit the circle.
>Circle aesthetic
I hate this new aged bullshit rounded aesthetic meme. I thought the whole 21st century look was being square, minimalist, simple, etc. and this whole bouncy cloudy fucking first year design student stuff makes me wanna vomit. It looks awful, especially when it meshes with older designs like Twitter. Again, look at how that circle avatar just wastes space next to the profile bio, which is a nice square. Fuck silicon valley man.
>Icons are outlines
This isn't ENTIRELY bad, but to me it makes the whole thing look really devoid of color. This is what a lot of people hated about the YouTube changes when they redesigned, there was just so much white space.
>Icons were redrawn
They look bloated. The reply icon change is really stupid because it conveys less information than before.
>Lack of color
One of those things you don't realize is good until it's gone. Sometimes on your timeline you'll see things that are either retweeted (green icon) or liked (red icon) by someone you follow. These used to have little icons that were either green or red, but now they are gone for some reason, so that instant realization is gone. It's small but I liked it before. Otherwise it just adds to the whole site looking deovid of color.

tl;dr 2/10 for making me reply, Twitter

>>311447
I bet the team got $100k/person/year for this and they """analyzed""" it for months before pushing it live.

Strip away all individuality from the giant hallow mega-corps with no personality.

S-skype-kun yamete

File: Screen Shot 2017-06-15 at 10.54.27 AM.jpg (59KB, 1266x702px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1266x702px

>>311414
Seems about right

dad?

>>311003
What?

Honestly, just print out an actual photo of a deer and trace the outline of its head. Unless you really focus, animal anatomy can be tricky. Easier to just work with an actual image.

>>310246
Time New Roman 12pt

or how about trying to find something similar, you faggot.

>>310246
Try a typewriter font. Or courier would probably work. Markham too.