Archived threads in /gd/ - Graphic Design - 131. page

File: Sam Larson-11-10.jpg (247KB, 957x954px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 957x954px

>>277705
how about you post the designs you've made and we tell you what to fix.

File: sfa.png (107KB, 2039x1255px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 2039x1255px

Nice and simple

>>277909
MS Paint

File: jesus man.jpg (68KB, 622x413px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 622x413px

>>275023
you are the saddest human being I've ever witnessed

>>275033
Start off by taking a different picture of yourself outside in similar lighting
Also this
>>275033

>>275023
hahahahaha what the fuck

File: Untitled.jpg (16KB, 329x122px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 329x122px

This is the error I receive when I try to open the images.
>side note, running PS CC 2015

I have this problem as well. My workaround is, after locating the image from the source, enlarging it and taking a screenshot.

>>277843
>>is there a way around this?

Doesn't seem like there is
https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1851662

If you have a lot of images to process I would recommend, if you're on Windows, using IrfanView to batch-process the files and resave them to solve the issue.

The easy way is to just use an easy to read, and memorable tf, set the name of said business maybe 36pt? , next at maybe 16pt? write down what the business is, and shove it some where near the name, preferably arranged in some sort of block form. fill in the negative space with a large dash, or maybe some kind of clip art, voila easy logo.

make a moodboard of other businesses in those categories

>>277743
TF? TypeFace?

>>277781
Can you explain what the best way to fill out a moodboard is?

>>277699
Flash

>>277699
Think they're called motion graphics. Not sure what software you use to make them but I'd assume after effects or flash.

>>277758
Thanks.

fuck off weirdo

>>277608
You can't see what's under those.

Requests go in another board

File: no.jpg (216KB, 640x947px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 640x947px

>>277608
no requests here

bawmp

>>277509
>>>/wsr/

>>277496
Why is her left eye deformed?

>>277384
>hover me
What do you do for mobile devices? Can you provide a live view?

>>277384
>gfx
it's like you don't even want to be taken seriously

Don't really like the white on blue colour scheme. The contrast could be more striking so the site is legible.

At the moment the only interesting thing on the screen is another screen.

The balance is also off. Everything is too weighted to the right side of the screen.

>>277287
Not supposed to be horizontal. Fuck

>>277287
How is this a logo ?

>>277292
Its a unique shape and icon to signify the brand. Are you on the right board?

>>275648
>le everything is supposed to look pretty
Are you annoyed that it doesn't resemble some app/minimal trash?
This literally gets the idea across perfectly fine, aside from the fact that the truck itself clearly gets across what it is

Bold serifs for legibility at greater distances.
Yellow-to-white gradient that contrasts well against red without being too harsh to read.

It's functional. Functional does not always mean dripping with style. And design is always function before form.

>>275648
I literally don't see a problem with it

File: costume.jpg (717KB, 1750x2500px) Image search: [Google]

717KB, 1750x2500px

>signing this

Good

File: Untitled-1.png (403KB, 830x638px) Image search: [Google]

403KB, 830x638px

The cruelties these eyes have seen...

maybe it is inspired by the signs of the local club scene. think its okay with this mysterious touch

>>274793
Reminds me of hacker scene or that new watchdogs game.

File: 1440609755999.png (855KB, 596x595px) Image search: [Google]

855KB, 596x595px

>>274793

I love it.

But also I'm a huge sucker for 90-00's ugly rave posters. Post more if you gottem, I'd love to see more.

Including the only one I have atm

shabby is a better word

File: 05.png (6MB, 1767x2500px) Image search: [Google]

6MB, 1767x2500px

>>277396
>shabby is a better word
distressed is a better word.
really, google ps distress tutorial.

it's mostly texturing and/or using grungy brushes.
never tried it myself, but machine wash is a pretty popular PS plug-in for doing this.
https://www.misterretro.com/filters/machine-wash-deluxe/wash-effects

>>277399
oh phenx phenx

>>276987
>what are big dos and don'ts?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVkLVRt6c1U

>>276987
Aren't proposals sent before you actually get the job?

>>277054
I know higher ups there who basically guaranteed it to me if I write a nice proposal. she told me the max budget. the decision is mostly hers.

>>276847
>mastercard
>Not Mastercard
My jimmies.

>>276847
Every one of these is an improvement though (although maybe not premiere league).

They're not paying by the pixel or for how much you changed their old logo, they're paying you to solve business problems. Every single one of these redesigns wasn't just a new or altered logo, it was a branding exercise that effected every visual aspect of their company and how it is perceived by their customers and potential customers. I'm not saying every rebrand is worth the money paid but saying "any one of us could've done it" is not true. If you have the skills to negotiate a contract for rebranding a multi-national company and convincing them that a slightly altered logo is worth 1 million bucks then you wouldn't be posting on /g/.

>>276850
/gd/*