>AI won't take jobs that require creativity

>>62484806
>asoif
>creativity

>>62484806
i hate game of cucks fans so goddamn much

>>62484843
You'll have friends someday, don't worry.

It's not artificial intelligence in the normal sense of the word. It's just executives and producers who make up some rules and the story is written based on the reaction of the market analysis. It's only "artificial intelligence" because no real intelligence is involved.

File: 1457998130523-0.png (109KB, 263x281px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 263x281px

>>62484868
Another anon but... My friends don't talk about tv shows about fake medieval history.

>>62484914
Edgar Allan Poe's wet dream.

File: 1424530091756.jpg (20KB, 251x242px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 251x242px

>>62484914
>the story is written based on the reaction of the market analysis

>>62485457
>>62484914
>>62484806
In due time, we'll have fully automated story writing for the masses and even movies will be entirely machine-made. "True" creative writing of "genius" won't be replaced because that's not what AI does. AI can only recognize patterns and replicate them to a T. Consumer media is very cut-and-paste, so it's not a herculean task.

Classics however aren't just good stories, they hold more weight for whatever reasons and I don't see AI figuring those out anytime in the near century.

>>62485506
https://github.com/brandonrobertz/artificial_seinfeld

>>62485515
Has science gone too far?

>>62485553
I am trying to run it to see if science has gone too far.