Good deals thread

>>62465445
You've done goofed.

link pl0x

>>62465462
yea i sure did mate, the 6700k has a resell value of 250 bux and the motherboard is like 50 i cant even buy a 1070 for that fucking price

>>62465445
Bought a Thinkpad T440p for $120

wait for AIBs faggot.

>>62465658
nigger i already saw the asus strix version, you can get the refference to the same temps if you undervolt it without losing any performance

Got a 6tb Toshiba x300 in Orico USB-C case for £128 delivered.

>>62465462
>flashable with R64 bios
>goofed
right

File: clone_me.jpg (247KB, 1961x871px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 1961x871px

>>62465717
Aye. Got mine running sweet.

>>62465786
56 flashed to 64 btw. Got mine for £380.

>>62465814
how big is the risk, i know it has dual bios but i just want to be sure, i've only ever done overclocking on a 980

>>62465831
Zero risk. If you get a bad flash switch to second BIOS. Boot up. Switch back to other BIOS and reflash.

>>62465850
allright sounds good, i've only increased the power slider to 50% for now, also what happened to the whole windows secure thing where you couldnt flash bioses on the Vega(watched some youtube vids on it)

>>62465831
literally need to be brain ded to fuck up

For comparison. One of the fastest GTX 1080's (Note the graphics score in the screenshot. Not the stupid system score they always use).

http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/gigabyte-geforce-gtx-1080-aorus-xtreme-review,31.html

>>62465964
Oh and cheapest Gigabyte Aorus 1080 in the UK is £476 :)

>>62466027
Sorry £493. The other was reference lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1p9jzb78QA

vega 64 underclocked to fury x speeds yields the same performance.
vega was a mistake. should have made moar coars instead of those broken shit and no driver.

>>62466277
oh hi mr.goy did you overpay for a 1070 and are now sour?

>>62465445
You love noise and heat.

>>62466337
ah i see you live in 2015, this isnt the 290/390 days, the card is pretty quiet unless you ramp up the fans to max and the temps on my refference are around 75C(thats how much the asus strix model reaches)

>>62466277
>implying Richard has any idea what he is taking about
He is way above his pay grade here,he should go back to making promotional videos for hp laptops.

>tfw 1080ti
I'll probably get whatever comes after Navi if it doesn't suck.

>>62465445
My 4770K is faster than any Ryzen garbage in games, paired with a 1080 Ti, and a 144Hz monitor.

>>62466277
The problem is the drivers as always. The UARCH is not enabled yet. Primitive Shaders etc will expose the difference btween the two GPU's (if they can get it working properly that is).

File: 1491221061481.jpg (208KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 1000x1000px

>>62465445
Vega56 is a good card to have in the stable. More important is a solid Ryzen setup for the timeline ahead. I currently am stocked with Intel hardware. AMD hardware. Nvidya and Radeon. Can't go wrong w/ mid tier GPUs from either company. Enjoy desu

File: Comb15092017124030.jpg (584KB, 1600x3494px) Image search: [Google]

584KB, 1600x3494px

>>62465462
This. OP you're gonna deeply regret not getting an Nvidia©®™ GPU. So much you'll commit suicide TWICE.

>>62466277
>Fury X already had scaling issues
>just throw moar ALUs
Is this peak shitposting?
>>62467157
The problem lies in what they've done.
It's not represented in any APIs.
Heck it's the biggest "FUCK YOU" possible to Khoronos and MS straight from le ebin first DX9 compliant GPU man himself.

>>62467179
>5% faster
>20% more expensive
Maybe if it wasn't for that power consumption and prices I would consider getting vega.

>>62467405
kekels i bought mine for 499, and that power consumption argument is fucking laughable, if you want low power just fucking buy a 1050ti

>>62467405
>>62467432
Aren't the vega cards significantly overvolted? Isn't that why they became so insanely popular with miners?

>>62467479
They are not insanely popular with miners.

>>62467432
>American
Literally your opinion doesn't matter, $400 is the starting price for 1060 here the cheapest vega starts at ~750.

>>62467479
nothing stops you from lowering the voltage there are no negatives to it, you keep the performance and lower temps and also lower power consumption but even at stock it doesnt exactly matter

>>62467497
psssstttt im a european cunt i just know where to look

>>62467179
> a uv vega can beat a midrage card!

I'm shocked, more news at 11

>>62467515
Maybe I would believe you if that 499 was in euros, but even then I doubt it.

>>62467536
1080 being mid-range, good laugh, shill

>>62467541
that 499 is in euros

File: Result_-_2017-09-11_02.18.32.jpg (184KB, 978x2036px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 978x2036px

>>62467536
My £380 for RX Vega 56 was well spent.

>>62467546
The 1070 now is a highend card like the 970 3.5 or the 770? Good job.

>>62467570
yea i bet you have a 970 or a 1050 or something and you're just shitting on better cards because you cant have one, grapes are always sour when you cant reach them

>>62467546
>post the GTX 1070 vs V56
>talk about the 1080

inb4 Dirt 4...

>>62467599
>MUH 500+ EUR 1070, PLZ DONT UNDERV0LT
dont worry friend nvidia gimpworks will fuck you over sooner or later and you'll be on par with the rx 580 or something

>>62467598
Literally what?

>>62467599
Well nobody seems to have a ton of gaming benchmarks on an undervolted/overclocked RXV56 yet. Hardware Unboxed could not get their clocks to stick (doing it wrong) so they don't really count. Also flashed to a RV64 nmakes a difference too because HBM gets an extra power boost so can clock higher.

>>62467491
breh...

https://www.techpowerup.com/236748/rx-vega-achieves-43-mh-s-130-w-in-ethereum-mining

>>62467696
Most others have not been able to acieve that from reading around and Youtubers. The 130w thing is also very dubious. Powerplay tables might help perhaps. It's a lot of tweaking regardless and the cost of RX Vega right now makes it not worthwhile.

File: 1440.png (34KB, 500x650px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 500x650px

>>62467639
>gimpworks
Each Nvidia generations has a big performance jump (7xx to 9xx to 10xx). Just wait™ Navi or the drivers.

>>62467734
Please remind me what hashrate the 1080 achieves

>>62467758
oh yea totally a big performance jump, remember the 970 vs the 390, the 970 used to beat it but the 490 started stomping on it and these benchmarks look like shilling for nvidia

Where are the AiB models?

>>62467758
>Stock settings
I really want someone with brains to test them based on what they CAN do rather than just what is set at stock. OC 1070 vs UV/OC (possibly flashed) RX Vega 56. It would be far more interesting.

>>62467808
asus strix releasing soon but the temps dont exactly look promising to me, you can achive them with just undervolting the refference model and still have the same performance

>>62467814
They don't do OC benchmarks on every part because every part has different overclocking potential. Stock clocks are the clocks guaranteed to work on each card.

>>62467814
What they can do is based entirely on the silicon lottery

>>62467555
Ok I found one for 510 euro I'm willing to believe 499 now, still with shipping it's more expensive than 1070. Now I'm considering vega tho.

>>62467817
I don't want to deal with ANUSes horrific customer support.
Where are XFX or Sapphire?
It's been over a month already.

>>62467830
the g1 gigabyte 1070 literally costs 495 on amazon.de

>>62467835
not sure only thing confirmed for now is the asus

>>62467862
So AMD is delayed the AiB cards.

>>62467802
>490

BTW, the 390 is a OC 290 and the rx580 is a OC rx480 anon.

>>62467826
>>62467828
I know that but there must be a middle ground. I am pretty sure 99% RX Vega 56 can run at 1471Mhz (the boost clock) and 900Mhz memory without throttling with a slight voltage reduction.

>>62465549
noice, pics?

>>62467869
Why?

>>62467896
Have a wild fucking guess.

>>62467869
i dont think AMD did that on purpose to be honest, im sure the AiB manufacturers delayed it for one reason or another, it would be pretty stupid to let Asus get the first gpu out considering they have exclusive partners like the sapphire and XFX

>>62467893
I literally have no cameras but it looks more or less flawless

I think the previous owner just didn't realize what she had

>>62467913
ANUS is back at being AMD's pocketboys tho.
>i dont think AMD did that on purpose to be honest
Oh they did.
They've already traded mindshare for happy shareholders twice.
They don't need to do it the third time.

>>62467883
and the 390 still beat the amazing, the magnificent, the cream of the crop gtx 970 which was the pearl of nvidia

>>62467941
asus isnt exactly AMD property though unlike the aforementioned XFX and sapphire, there is absolutely no reason to let ASUS have the first shot

>>62467961
Anyway AMD is staggering the AiB launch.

>>62467835
It's in frogs but.

http://www.hardware.fr/news/15240/quand-rx-vega-custom-octobre.html

>>62467978
why tho, why would they handycap themselves, they know a lot of people are waiting for it and no one refuses free money

>>62467990
Have a wild guess.
>>62467983
>October
Heh.
Checks out.

>>62467996
i literally have no idea and i dont think you do either

>>62467999
>i have no idea what is wrong with Vega

>>62468005
nothing is wrong with vega in its MSRP variant, its not AMD's fault everyone decided to go insane and raised the price about twice

>>62468010
Everything is wrong with Vega, and we all know why.

>>62468027
allrighty there is no point in talking to you, why are you salty little boy? did you buy the 1070 for more it was worth

>>62468058
>denying that Vega is not working properly
?

>>62468067
which part of it exactly isnt working properly

>>62468072
Have a wild guess.

>>62468085
go fuck yourself

>>62468010
>nothing is wrong with vega in its MSRP variant
Except for knocking out neighborhood transformers when it turns on.

>>62468098
Aww, no need to be so angry, brainlet.
>>62468115
Anything GP102 also does exactly that i guess.

>>62468115
if we'll use old memes, i'd rather have the transformer explode and not my EVGA 1070

>>62468133
>buying EVGA after the royal fuckup that was their 10 series cards
But why?

>>62468123
>Titan Xp performance at 250W
>GTX 1080 performance at 350W
Hmm

>>62468187
>4k ALUs at 300w
>3840 ALUs at ~300w
So no difference?

why are all mobos and gpus still so high demand

fugg you miners
i need muh ryzen T_T

IVE BEEN WAITING 3 MONTHS
REEEEEEEEEEEe

>>62468163
>implying they dont have the best warrenty

i got a 5 year warrenty for a refurbished gpu

>>62468216
Don't worry, it should go down SOON.

China FUD has been driving the price of cryptocurrencies down.

My portfolio has taken at least a 20% hit because of China.

>>62465445
>get rid of a CPU that has easily half a decade of life (read: not being a bottleneck) ahead of it, only to pay the full price for a sidegrade CPU and mobo
>exchange it for a power hungry, hot garbage reference GPU at the single worst moment you could have gotten a GPU in the last decade

More like "poor life choices thread."

>>62465658
release WHEN

File: sad man.jpg (109KB, 768x432px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 768x432px

>>62465445
>moving to vega 56

I really wish I could afford vega, but even 1060 is too much for me right now.

>>62470041
just get 1050ti