Do you think general computation will eventually be regulated? It would be pretty easy since there are only a few very large companies with semiconductor fabrication capabilities. In the long run it will also be much more efficient and effective than just regulating the internet.
Relevant document:
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Coming_War_on_General_Computation
>>62462208
>Tech companies bend over for the NSA
>NSA demands to be allowed to place exploits in ring -2
>Access granted
What do you mean "eventually"?
Shit's gonna be like in Dune, so we'll have to turn into Mentats (the opposite of brainlets) and do them calculations faster than your momma opening her snatch to jamal.
Already happened twenty years ago.
>>62464051
>>62464165
As it is now you can still write and run arbitrary code on any desktop and laptop.
>>62464277
Sort of, given the state of hardware blacklists/whitelists. One could make the far reach and say that blocking certain hardware blocks certain software. Only some devices can be librebooted, an even farther reach.
More relevant are the recent browser and search engine scandals where our /g/ users can't find a solution which works, doesn't spy so much, and has no bias/censorship. It turns out there aren't any choices which can be *proven* to fit. In this example alone, your "eventually regulated" makes us ask "the hell do you mean *eventually*"? We're stuck.
>Do you think general computation will eventually be regulated?
Yes. Is that why you made the thread?
>>62462208
What movie is that from?
>>62465137
https://m.blog.naver.com/PostView.nhn?blogId=filmclassic&logNo=203552731&proxyReferer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F