Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: Ships fooled in GPS spoofing attack suggest Russian cyberweapon New Scientist.jpg (102KB, 796x680px) Image search:
[Google]
102KB, 796x680px
So what do we do now?
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2143499-ships-fooled-in-gps-spoofing-attack-suggest-russian-cyberweapon/
>>
>>62458589
We start reading NEWS rather than OLDS.
>>
>>62458589
Bull fucking shit
go to /k/ and they will tell you why it happened twice.
>>
Cryptopgraphically sign GPS beacons
>>
>>62458600
It is not supported by GPS
>>
>>62458599
Why don't you enlighten us then?
>>
Encryption.
>>
>>62458589
>suggest
weasel word
>>
>>62458627
It has to do with the bad employment practices in the Navy.
>>
>>62458624
>It is not supported by GPS
It's not supported by civilian GPS.
>>
We need to ban encryption so we can catch terrorists.
What do you have to hide? Are you a pedophile?
>>
What about GLONASS?
>>
>>62458726
This isn't about the navy ships colliding.
>>
They are already spoofing GPS near Kremlin.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRlxSF5bwTI
>>
>>62458599
>Claiming /k/ has ANY answer worth listening to.
HAHAHA
>>
>>62458624
L1 GPS band already does
>Coarse-acquisition (C/A) and encrypted precision (P(Y)) codes
>>
>>62458734
Who cares about civilian protocols?
What are they going to do, make a shipping vessel run aground?
Big deal, they gain nothing from pulling road runner antics on the high seas.
Thread posts: 17
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1