How the fuck did the OOP meme become so popular? Pic not related.

>>62447057
>>>/9gag/

>>62447057
Private sector uses it. You will understand once you get a real job.

>>62447057
Because it's easier to conceptualize, making it easier for retards.

For similar reasons, Python is gaining ground (only one right way of doing things).

File: 1493352970282.png (173KB, 500x700px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 500x700px

>>62447057
It's the best way to force bad programmers to write pseudo decent, kinda understandable code you can work on without having a stroke.
On the bad side some architects tend to abuse advanced OOP patterns even when they are not necessary to justify their bigger paycheck, obfuscating their code for the sake of "maintainability" but ending up making it actually less understandable and mantainable.

>>62447057
Moore's law allowed programmers to be very lazy with optimization for about three decades. CPU cycles were a very cheap resource compared to development costs.

Now that is beginning to change as Moore's law has failed.

>>62447057
It makes working in big teams easier for long periods of time. Don't like a piece of functionality? Replace the whole object. You can distribute work evenly and can even buy in functionality(usually poo coders)

>>62447057
Inverting a matrix is literally equivalent to solving a linear system. No magic whatsoever.

>>62447057
It was a combination of two things
A: an emphasis of getting a product out the doors in a somewhat (barely) usable state,
B: a desire to get away by hiring third rate programmers paid peanuts, and
C: computers fast enough to carry the extra load of all the OOP gunk and methods and layers upon layers.

Many forget that large parts of VMS was programmed in assembly. And the uptime was awesome.

>>62447491
I already have a real job, MIT nigger.

>>62448648
What does OOP have to do with optimization?

>>62448936
>pic not related

File: 1496964531235.png (30KB, 710x577px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 710x577px

>>62449992
>he actually reads OPs

>>62448936
it can be however pretty fucking tedious
the fact that it's computationally expensive even for computers says a lot

>>62450234
This.
Solving a 4*4 system by hand is different form machine-solving a 1000*1000 system through LU, LDL^T factorization, etc.

>>62448648
>moores law has failed
Don't you mean Intel is comfortable with no competition for the last 6 years? Only now, they're increasing performance