There is some good search engine that ins't a botnet yet?

File: 1505303619263.jpg (87KB, 539x807px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 539x807px

>>62447001
Give Qwant a go, https://www.qwant.com/web although, I am sticking with SearX for now since I never search things in my native Language.

>>62447058
There was a thread last week about qwant trying to sell data m8

>>62447080
Oh, thanks for telling me that, I really didn't caught that. I'll look it up in the archive.
>>62447001
Never mind my advice.
Maybe YaCy improved a bit? But it's probably still very shitty.

>>62447058
I used qwant for a year, and it's meh.
I often had to re-search the same thing on other engines in order to find what I want.

File: 1495373120722.png (139KB, 383x364px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 383x364px

>>62447098
I sadly don't have much other suggestions for you.
Maybe practice rephrasing your search criteria a bit clearer?
I know this actually helped me out a lot when I first started using SearX and I stopped complaining about it being inconsistent after I took that in mind.

searx.steinscraft.net

>>62447185
SSL is broken :/

>>62447058
You can edit the .xml and add the relevant bits to the default search box, so it will search in $desired_language no matter your cookies and whatnot
>>62447080
Checked and didn't find anything, please point out what do you mean. Qwant is your best bet if you don't want to constantly fall back on google (albeit it supports something like "bang syntax" as well)

>>62447185
>tried query
>shit results
every six months or so I give it a peep, but it's invariably irredeemable shit

>>62447237
I don't remember very well but there some discussion about that.

I will try use the >>62447185 cause it seems better then the normal searx, if it's shit then i will go to Qwant.

searx.info