less single core perf than a 1600 3% faster on multicore of a 1600

>>62424535
intel 2017

People who use geekbench seriously should be lined up and executed.

File: Apple-iPhone-8-Geekbench-screenshot.jpg (157KB, 690x1556px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 690x1556px

>>62424535
LOL PC fags BTFO, iphone 8 gets better single thread score than both CPUs

>>62425289
If you actually believe a ~10w mobile CPU has more single core performance than a 90w+ desktop CPU i've got a bridge to sell you.

>>62425289
post this on /v/ and consolefags might actually believe you

>>62425347
If you believe geekbench is worth jack shit then you are the same retard that believe iphone cpus are better than desktops.

>>62425414
It's fine if you want to compare the same architecture.

So if you have two desktop CPUs running the same OS, go ahead and compare away.

But android VS windows? Retarded to compare
iOS vs android? Retarded to compare
Windows vs iOS? Retarded to compare

You simply can't compare cross operating system AND cross architecture (x86 vs ARM) and expect the results to be meaningful.

>>62425289
Well, looks like the memes were right.
Geek bench really is useless, holy shit.

>>62424943
so geekbench still doesnt matter

>just wait till 2020™

File: geekbenchmacbookpro-800x384.jpg (28KB, 800x384px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 800x384px

>>62425425
geekbench is meaningless when even the 28W i7-7567U gets higher single threads.

>>62425487
>comparing across OS's again

wew its like I just said not to do that.

>>62425453
https://www.realworldtech.com/forum/?threadid=136526&curpostid=136666

x86 benchmark is shit. Literally superpi 2.0

>>62425565

>>just wait till 2020™

im sure geekbench will matter once intel surpass finally amd

File: intel-core-i7-7700k-geekbench.jpg (143KB, 869x829px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 869x829px

>>62425527
>Windows 10
>x86 CPU
>Geekbench
>7700K
>6139

>>62425583
Intel already BTFOs AMD in geekbench

>>62425631
OP post is geekbench 3.4.2

Yours is Geekbench 4.0.0

Comparing them directly is meaningless.

File: 1504811041382.png (84KB, 253x239px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 253x239px

>>62425631

>>62425631
AMD BTFO. i7 7700k > 1700 in multicore. AMD BTFO AGAIN

>>62425658
Geekbench is meaningless unless you compare chips from the same uarch

File: 3.4.2.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>62425658
Ok pham I got you
>geekbench 3.4.2
>Windows 10
>x86 CPU


ZOMFG still BTFO
Geekbench is useless.

>>62425718
pls delet. geekbench is the ultimate benchmark

>>62425718
>5GHz
>5486


>>62424535
>3.6GHz
>4113

Now lets estimate what the OP would get at 5GHz
4113/3.6 = 1142.5 * 5 = ~5700 estimated

So ~5700 vs your ~5500.

Not to mention it's 6 core.

>>62425801
you are assuming that they will reach 5ghz

>>62425821
It doesn't matter, we're talking relative performance, not every 7700k can hit 5GHz either.

>>62425821
The same thing happens if you do the math the other way to clock the 7700k down to the levels of the 8600k in the OP.

5486/5 = 1097.2 * 3.6 = 3949.92
4113 vs 3949.

Same thing we see when we take it up to 5ghz.