/wt/ watch thread

>>62414838
>say that it's impressive that the last generation Apple watch beat entire watch companies
>somehow BTFO themselves
What did you mean? Hodinkee was giving credit where credit was due hardly a btfo.

>>62414925
Nice. What kind of movement?

>>62414965
Yes.

>>62414984
Fuck off, shitposter.

>>62414965
That's an esa9162, a 2nd gen tuning fork movement.

File: IMG_20170912_204954.jpg (3MB, 4160x3120px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x3120px

I like to wear a DW in most situations.
I have a designated sports watch for that kind of stuff, it's the casio a158.

File: ESA-9162.jpg (131KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 500x500px

>>62415006
Cool.
>344/SR42/SR1136 battery
Fuck, that's an uncommon battery. Have fun trying to buy one from any watchmaker.

>>62414838
>we wear the Apple Watch because it’s the best smartwatch of its kind and it will probably be the last watch we ever own.
The last watch you ever own for a whole year until you throw it out and buy the new model? I can at least understand any other valid argument in favor of smart watches over mechanical watches, but what the fuck are these people smoking?

>>62414711
That is way too big for you, wristlet

>>62415484
My favourite thing about the apple watch is they improve every part of it by a little, except the battery life. The latest release was filled with "and this saves battery life" only to end saying it's the same battery life as the last model.

>>62415493
The angle makes it look too big.

>>62415724
No, it really is too big. Even with that angle it swallows your wrist.

>>62415724
Angle doesn't change the fact the lugs overhang your wrist. Think about how the lugs and your wrist are effectively on the same plain in that picture and that means camera distortion is minimal if not non-existent.

File: dateJUST.jpg (31KB, 640x445px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 640x445px

>ywn own a rolex
why even live

>>62415934
B...but anon, a Rolex is going to be the next watch I buy.

>>62415934
Can anyone compete with such a bracelet? Literally a flawless jubilee if I've ever seen one.

File: Omega2.jpg (167KB, 1370x794px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 1370x794px

>>62416033
Rolex makes the best bracelets, period.

>>62415934
But they are pretty affordable 2bh. If you really want one save and get it.

File: 1492865994427.png (176KB, 1071x827px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 1071x827px

>>62415724

File: 20170324_121033.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>62416748

>>62415062
never realized just how shitty these look up close
also that backward D what the fuck

File: DSC_5078.jpg (174KB, 1200x798px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 1200x798px

>>62415934
They're not exactly rare. Just stop buying shitters.

i'm ready to graduate from my timex and casio collection
what do i do with these
?

>>62417705
shitter

>>62417705
https://youtu.be/mBFI8ScdE4E

>>62417110
this is honestly the best advice anyone can take. I see idiots on here with 15 Seiko including vintage ones that they send to get serviced directly after purchase. Save your money and buy good watches. If you wont have 5 grand for at least 5 years get one 200 dollar watch now and wait.

Anyone ordered from seiyajapan before?

>>62417898
Yes, just a buckle though.

>>62417840
Are you just shitposting or does it not occur to you that some people collect vintage watches?

>>62417898
I haven't ordered from him, but Seiya's reputation is pretty much as solid as they come. I wouldn't hesitate to order from him.

>>62418129
>>62418195
Ty

>>62418185
its more just about how people waste money. if the entire sake of your collection to get vintage watches its obviously not a big deal but buying a bunch of fucked up old seikos is not really a great way to spend money. Unless you are claiming multiple people on this board specifically only want vintage seikos.

File: LRM_EXPORT_20170420_141630.jpg (4MB, 3124x3124px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3124x3124px

>>62418493
There are at least two /wt/ regulars who collect vintage Seikos and more who have and enjoy at least one vintage Seiko watch. Hell, it might be more accurate to say I mostly collect vintage watches in general, with some exceptions for new watches.

File: sarg005.jpg (355KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

355KB, 1024x1024px

Why is the SARG005 damn near perfect?

>>62418629
Look we are moving far away from my original statement. I just meant its bad to waste money on a lot of watches you don't want as much as a really good watch.

>>62418804
>that you don't want as much
Who are you to say what people do and do not want?

>>62418861
what?

>>62418861
Is this autism?

>>62418866
"I just meant its bad to waste money on a lot of watches you don't want as much as a really good watch."
>watches you don't want as much

What don't you understand about what I said?

>>62418879
I guess being literate and being able the think for yourself is autistic now, isn't it?

>>62418894
i am saying watches you(as in anyone reading the comment) don't want as much. i was saying this so you would ignore my original comment about seiko and use the advice to save up for a the more expensive watch you want. Most people want a more expensive watch. if you like collecting 40 dollar watches and don't want a nice watch then obviously you are in the small subset that should ignore this advice. i am not telling anyone to like or do anything. judging by your crippling autism you should probably avoid any future attempts at communication with other human beings however.

File: faggot.png (32KB, 755x388px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 755x388px

>>62418925
oh its you again who thinks everyone is one person. well just fuck off already.

File: 20160727_231202_001.webm (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x720px

Had a long flight so I put together a pastebin on some watch basics - suggestions for additions welcome.
https://pastebin.com/bt3Xk1eh

>>62418983
This is pretty good ill give it a read and see if i can add anything. Thanks for posting it here!

>>62418959
No matter how much I want a Simplicity I'm not going to have one no matter how much I save. Your statement was presumptious in addition to being a shit blanket statement to make in the first place.

>>62418980
When did I call you the other guy? Don't get your panties in a twist.

>>62418775
No >muh minimalism bullshit and not super fancy or overly complicated.

>>62418804
>I just meant its bad to waste money on a lot of watches you don't want as much as a really good watch.
Sure, and that's sensible advice. I was just pointing out that such a description is unlikely to apply to people who collect vintage watches. People rarely deal with the additional work of collecting vintage watches unless they have a specific interest in them.

>>62419058
how was it presumptuous? it was just advice saying don't buy a bunch of shitters if you are saving for a more expensive watch. Yu are fucking nitpicking the way i wrote my post to fit your crazy fucking thought process. If you are not saving up for a more expensive watch then don't fucking think about the post it doesn't apply o you. if you go back up the comments you can see someone wanted a rolex.


>>62419260
it doesn't i honestly thought people were buying those seikos because their couldn't afford other watches i genuinely had no idea people collected old cheap watches. it was a bad example but if you are in that subset then then the advice is obviously not for you and can be ignored i did not make a formula for watch collecting.


I honestly just now realized half this thread is a semantic argument about a statement i thought was pretty simple and benign aimed at one person who said they wanted a Rolex and people like him. I am going to go ahead and go to sleep now and never come back to this shit hole again.

>>62419872
>never come back to this shit hole again.
good riddance

File: uaI3eFUaiBQ3LdGEy-WzwY6Y24aZohtJxXKaJY_kZfw.jpg?w=576&s=44c26fbe4296a36164346006e170a060.jpg (82KB, 576x768px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 576x768px

Copped my first nomos rep. The dial is printed with a laser printer I'm pretty sure.

>>62420837
Something seems off about it.

File: tgv.jpg (74KB, 514x555px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 514x555px

Reminder that her name is Tristana

File: 1503172417776.jpg (279KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 1600x900px

Post nice dials

File: Poljot.jpg (4MB, 3120x4160px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3120x4160px

>>62422406

File: tgv3223.jpg (28KB, 370x292px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 370x292px

>>62417705

File: watch_reviewer_brah.png (265KB, 406x538px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 406x538px

>>62421309
Stop hating on he governor!

>>62414903
the ultimate poor man's collection

>>62421309
>her current name is not Issota

cultureless plebs gtfo

File: IMG_20170914_111950_HDR.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

Next service project, a Ronda 1377 from around 1975, inside an Etna Quartzonic (don't bother Googling it, you'll find nothing, must have been one of those Swiss parts assembler microbrands).

The date won't advance from the 6th, I'm really hoping it's not a broken/worn date wheel tooth, but it most likely is. At least there's still a shitton of Ronda 1377 parts around.

File: IMG_20170828_080841_776.jpg (2MB, 3024x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x3024px

>>62422406
>>62422457

File: Raketa1.jpg (2MB, 3092x2360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3092x2360px

>>62422406

The latest Hodinkee watch talk is the perfect example of old money watch.

File: Zenith-Defy-Lab-Watch-aBlogtoWatch-27.jpg (123KB, 1100x734px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 1100x734px

https://youtu.be/eSMjUsHwDRA

>108000bph
>0.3s/day guaranteed accuracy
>completely new type of balance
How can Grand Seiko recover?

Also RIP repfags, as this is probably impossible to reverse-engineer and copy with Chink manufacturing technology.

>>62424377
The case design is niggagay af though, it's sad to see a great manufacturer like Zenith has gone full Invicta.

>>62414943
>Megasonic
And the frequency is below even a kilohertz?? Ludicrous.

File: Zenith-Defy-Lab-15-Hz-2.jpg (297KB, 1000x838px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 1000x838px

>>62424517
How is this different from the elaborate case finishes Seiko did in the 70's?

If this were an old KS/GS you weebs would be fisting your assholes over it.

>>62424377
How loud is it actually? The start of that video triggers me something chronic.
Do we know how the movment actually works yet?
Are they planning to put it in their other watches? Which ones and which price points? I have more answers but I'm sure we don't have answers yet, pretty exciting to tell the truth.
Doesn't knock the 8 day power reserve GS out of my most desired watch but I do want one watch with that movement.
And 100% impossible for current chinks to copy as it sounds like it has some special snowflake quartz in it.

File: 306L12313_4VM8J_Group.jpg (193KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 1500x1500px

>>62422406
That as sub dials for ants.

Daniels knew how to do it, pic. related.

>>62424577
>How loud is it actually?
>The start of that video triggers me something chronic.
>Do we know how the movment actually works yet?
>Are they planning to put it in their other watches?
>Which ones and which price points?
>I have more answers but I'm sure we don't have answers yet
Perhaps you could read the AB2W article, you autistic fuck? How do you even breathe on your own?

>>62424377
>quartz
fucking dropped

File: jerry.jpg (16KB, 291x287px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 291x287px

>>62424639
I'm sorry I didn't know it was nincompoop hour on /wt/ again. I'll come back later.

>>62424377
oh look another unique revolutionary escapement!
it should get in line with UN's three escapements and GPs constant force and that escapement from renaud and that senfine thing from parmigani and that thing debethune is working on.

these things are memes anon, none of them will ever make it into mass production.

>>62424629
>hurr durr read the article
Somebody link it then. It's not in their video description or your post.

>>62424667
Quartz pieces are shitters.

>>62424667
>/wt/ has shitters shitting on GS for being quartz all day long
>shit on a different brands shitter quartz meme watch and you are a nincompoop
retard detected

>>62424629
>rages at someone for not reading an article
>article is no where to be found
>calls others autistic

File: ab2w_front_page.png (889KB, 1366x737px) Image search: [Google]

889KB, 1366x737px

>>62424668
Yeah, it can never be applied to mid-range watches even, maybe in a few decades when every shitter factory has tools for silicone parts manufacturing.

>>62424686
>>62424707
It's not a quartz, dumbshit. There's no quartz crystal anywhere in the watch, it's pure memenical.

>>62424686
>>62424799
>"OMG WE'RE'S THE ARTIKEL SOMEBODY HELP I'M A FUCKING RETARD PLEASE STERILIZE ME AND MY WHOLE FAMILY!!!!"
It's literally on the front page, you worthless dumb fucking animal. How do you even function?

>>62424639
Are you mentally deficient? It's a purely mechanical movement.

>>62424867
>Are you mentally deficient?
The absolute state of /wt/

does this prove that average attention span of /wt/ poster is 2 seconds?

Recommend a watch that has manual winding for less than $150? Happy to buy used or vintage. Basically, does something like a Seiko 5 exist while having hand winding <40mm?

File: amphibia_420526.jpg (104KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 800x600px

>>62425259
The Vostok Amphibia with the 420 case is 39mm, with pretty small lugs. I wear the beefier 710 case and it's still not very big. Also:
>automatic with manual winding
>200m diver
>steel case
>dozens of dial variations, endless modding options

>>62415934
B-but anon...I'm 3/4 of the way there

>>62425324
One thing to keep in mind with Vostoks though is the lack of a normal date quickset. I don't mind it on mine, but if someone is looking for convenience (such as being able to hand wind) it should be considered.

>>62425324
This. You can maybe swing an orientation Bambino in that budget too

>>62419007
cool, thanks anon

>>62424574
i thnk its fuck ugly but its only a 10 peice set. I just can't wait to see the oscillator in something else.

https://youtu.be/Dv-NzmPJW3A

>>62424859
I think you don't understand how cheap it is to manufacture mems parts. A company buys a few machines and they just pump out perfect pieces every time at almost no cost.

>>62425559
you just have to move the minute hand to 9 and past 12 its not that big of a deal

>>62419872
Hope you autists didn't scare away one of the watchmaker bros

>>62426964
I doubt watchmakers throw hissy fits at a whim's notice. They wouldn't last too long as watchmakers.

>>62426895

Wow, that is fucking cool. I actually like the case. Reminds me of old cast iron.

>>62427053
whats crazy is a company like Seiko could churn out a million of these watches for almost no money and sell them for 200 dollars. Can't wait till the chinks make these

File: 1502076781054.png (146KB, 671x519px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 671x519px

>>62427050
I fix watches and I have feelings too asshole.

File: IMG_0097.jpg (1MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4032x3024px

>>62425559
Solution. Get rid of date.

>>62427325
See where you are? This is not the place for those.

>>62427325
>feelings
vs
>hissy fit

>>62427432
I really dont want to get into this and someone here is clearly an autist but that was not a hissy fit.

ITT: People who don't understand the piezoelectric effect.

>>62427462
>getting into an autistic argument over semantics and leaving permanently
the only autists here are the delusional seiko males and fags with dinner plates in denial

>>62427514
>the only autists here are the delusional seiko males


Is it me or are there more of them now? I mean i know they are not reproducing but it does seem like there is more seiko cuckoldry going on here.

File: IMG_20170810_115414_HDR.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

I have an idea for a game we could play:
>post your vintage piece
>post a song from the year it was made, or alternatively the year it was released

Here's my Casio F-14, released on the market in 1984.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzFnYcIqj6I

@62427578
>implying you shitposters have been here long enough to understand how the watches posted here change over time.

>>62424574
Vintage Seikofag here. Fuck I love it. Hope unique textured dials/cases catches on

>>62428303
Yeah, too bad no scratch can ever be buffed out of those.

>>62428386
Just the nature of it. Can't come with a few downsides.

https://youtu.be/xWh0p9Irznw

>>62427586
I have no idea when was my vintage seiko 5 made. Seiko 5 finder gives me a whole decade of range.

File: IMG_20170911_220643.jpg (3MB, 4160x3120px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x3120px

>>62427586
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQHsXMglC9A&list=RDQMRoHCdKIjrwI

File: IMG_20170628_183050_HDR.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>62429206
What's the movement and the first digit of the serial number?

Mine starts with 5, and the 7019 movement, and styling indicate it's from 1975.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbhAf62wfgE

>>62429660
6 is the first serial number digit and the movement is 6309

>>62429656
Is this a troll or does someone actually like the way this watch looks?

>>62429790
Nice bait.
Daniel Wellington has one thing right, it's looks.

>>62429821
>tfw you can't tell if you're being played or not

>>62429752
So either one of the firsts in 1976 or a very late one in 1986. Got a pic of it?

File: Seikoo.jpg (47KB, 330x612px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 330x612px

Post (short term) grails.

File: ca98f3b5-adb4-4600-8153-a489aa98108c.jpg (81KB, 860x649px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 860x649px

>>62431788

>>62431788
Isn't short term grail and oxymoron?
I have a protrek in the mail so I guess that, after that I'm looking at getting a turtle but I'm waiting for a local guy to get them in so I can try one on, should be here in a month or so. And then after that I want to get a thin dress watch and am looking at the Citizen ones but might get a meme Orient. Shirt term I just want to get a watch for every occasion and after those I'm sorted and I can start working towards a Rolex.

File: sturmanskie6b.jpg (243KB, 950x750px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 950x750px

>>62431788
Getting there.

>>62431788
> grail is a 59 dollar seiko?

what did he mean by this?

>>62432268
Are you the guy building the Sturmanskie?
Post some pics of your parts and progress.

File: Crystron 4 Mega.jpg (566KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

566KB, 1600x1200px

>>62431788

>>62432612
Nothing arrived yet. Movement already passed Russian customs, not it's sitting at local customs.

This is the seller's pic of the movement.

File: 3133:movement.jpg (169KB, 1600x962px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1600x962px

>>62432612
>>62432705
Forgot pic, fuck, shit.

Also it's going to get a full service as soon as it arrives, since the factory oils are likely long dead (this movement looks like it was made around 1989), and I was originally getting a 3133 so I can say I've serviced a mechanical chronograph before, and I don't really trust the Seagull enough.

File: sturmanskie_dial.jpg (86KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 800x600px

>>62432612
And this will be the dial and hands. Dial might be a redial or rep, but the important part were this specific set of hands which I couldn't fin anywhere else.

I didn't order a case yet.

>>62419058
You aren't intelligent enough to be having this conversation without embarassing yourself. Please stop.

>>62432792
>>62432745
>>62432705
Interesting shit familia.
So you are a watchmaker i take it, or atleast a serious hobbyist?

Was the pricing of the Sturmanskie chronograph the original motive for your build? How much you save if you build your own?

>>62433024
Watch repairing is my job. I don't call it watchmaking, imo a watchmaker is someone with a more serious education than mine.

Yeah, the Sturmi is pretty much the cheapest non-shit chronograph available. By building my own watch from parts I only save about 10-15% compared to a good-condition used one, but here the parts are all NOS.

>>62432792
Yes they're fake.

>>62433093
Cool, remember to post the final result here several times.

>>62433198
You know the difference between a reproduction and a fake?

>>62433526
The line is blurry on this one. On one hand it was originally manufactured by Poljot, but on the other hand it might be a rework sold as a NOS dial.

I'll do high-res pics of it when it arrives, we got at least one guy here who knows his shit about Poljots, let him have the final verdict.

File: Lange 1815 Tourbillon Handwerkskunst 27.jpg (933KB, 1446x1600px) Image search: [Google]

933KB, 1446x1600px

>>62423762
>let me just set the date between 9pm/3am

>>62433526
>>62433632
It doesn't even have recessed subdials. The logo is too bold. The lume is the wrong consistency. The hands aren't flat and are too skinny.

File: sarb035.jpg (127KB, 1200x630px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 1200x630px

>>62431788

File: hrs_aviator1b.jpg (446KB, 1648x1236px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 1648x1236px

>>62434099
The subdials are recessed and have the circular pattern, it's just barely visible. I guess it might be a repaint job that ended up too thick.

Yeah the hands don't look good either, but I really wanted the chrono seconds hand with the wings. Which may not be accurate either. Fuck.

File: 20170809_234134.jpg (2MB, 3399x1244px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3399x1244px

>>62434131
Best place for pictures

File: 4L_Wk4UCQ9v.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>62434299

File: 0914171519.jpg (1MB, 2107x2660px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2107x2660px

how can vostok-lets compete?

>>62434460
I dream of a watch like this but in a smaller size.

File: 4L_SA68QSBD.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>62434487
They outdid themselves with the v2 apart from the size

File: 20170907_185835_HDR.jpg (2MB, 2620x4656px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2620x4656px

>>62434460

File: 20170914_185321.jpg (2MB, 2620x4656px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2620x4656px

>>62434579
second one.
just arrived yesterday

>>62434579
nice

File: 20170912_002130-3024x4032.jpg (2MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x4032px

Any suggestion on where I can find a replacement for a 325 battery in my cosmotron 5800?

>>62434579
upon second glance it looks like they cheaped out on the numerals with the updated movement version

File: 1496797412910.jpg (65KB, 604x504px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 604x504px

>>62434579
>>62434592
>being a lefty

>>62434716
IIRC, 384 batts are compatible.

>>62434188
There is no reason to believe it was ever an original dial. If they fake one piece they'll fake all of them, from scratch. You can even look at the tiny corners of the indices, or the date window chamfers, between your two photos.

File: 05290008.jpg (3MB, 4872x3248px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4872x3248px

>>62434461
Lol.

>>62435054
Is there any way to get a 1.35v battery or am I realistically stuck with a 1.5v like the 384?

>>62435127
WeinCell batts may fit, but I don't know.

>>62434981
no bully plz i was born this way

>>62434716
search up 325 battery alternates. The assbackwards thing about the naming conventions is that there are multiple ones for the same form factor and voltage

>>62435219
You needed to have the devil beat out of you as a child.

>>62435127
They make modified batteries for Accutrons that drop the voltage using an attached pcb. Probably not worth it though.

Is it feasible to re-plate (steel-like finish) a worn out slavshitter at home, or should I embrace the brass aesthetic?

File: expression.jpg (3KB, 211x152px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 211x152px

I was on the subway today and a guy stepped onto the train in front of me, a young professional clearly in his first "real" job, and I noticed he was wearing a nice watch and I looked closer. It was a fucking quartz Disel watch with a gingham shirt and you know what? It looked 100x better than all these horrible Raketas and Poljots and Seikos look on you guys. Diesel. Not even a fashion brand. A second-rate has-been fashion brand, making better watches than what you guys jerk off over, and probably for cheaper. You can't see inside the watch, and if you can, the watch is ugly anyway.

The people I see with these kinds of watches /g/ jacks off over are like, the pedicab guy, the sketchy Postmates guy standing in line at Juice Press, the guy on the train eating a fucking dollar slice with one hand while playing loud music with his phone in the other. People with no taste and no future.

Get a grip and realize that you look awful, no one gives a fuck that your watch isn't "in house", and there are about 20 different things people notice about you, that you have full control over, that are more important than whether your watch is mechanical or has hardlex or whatever stupid shit you agonize over all day.

oh and inb4 "but technology". Quartz is technology. A clusterfuck of unreliable parts dipped in grease is not "technology". Bringing super accurate timekeeping down to a price point where the cost of the device is not a major life expense is technology. Scrimping your NEETbux to pay extra to buy a poorfag's aspirational knockoff version of a hand made Swiss luxury product is not technology, so don't even try with that tortured logic. You're embarrassing.

>>62435374
Thanks, saved lad.

File: tapu.gif (35KB, 408x397px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 408x397px

>>62435374
simply ebin

>>62435374
You put some effort on it I'll give (You) that.

>>62434131
thats probably the nicest seiko/ strap combo i have ever seen including the grand seikos

>>62434514
i would kill for this in silver with a sunburst black dial at 35mm

>>62435525
That watch looks much better in pictures. In real life it's 45mm lug to lug. I sold mine on ebay without even wearing it, don't get memed

>>62435374
good photo selection as well top notch work m8. Cheers!

File: IMG_20170914_211614.jpg (1015KB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

1015KB, 2448x3264px

r8 mine

File: 4L_dxEbItCO.jpg (284KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 1080x1080px

>>62435525

>>62435546
What did this person mean to say with this post?

>>62435616
I can see more finishing went into that but i genuinely find it to be ugly and i think way too much is going on there.

>>62435689
i have no idea it was my comment and i don't really get it.

File: seallolololo.jpg (571KB, 2000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

571KB, 2000x1000px

>All these listings saying "SEIKO HARD REX"

File: HOMOS.png (1005KB, 885x1053px) Image search: [Google]

1005KB, 885x1053px

>>62435863
I've the watch for you.

>>62436220
that looks even worse and those are the size of a fucking skyscraper

File: IMG_1977.jpg (2MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2448x3264px

it seems my late dad's watch is a 77' Daini?

>>62435616
I bought a Seiko GMT movement recently and unless I'm mistaken, the GMT hand moves in tandem with the hour hand. It's kind of cool, but I think it means I'm stuck in Japan's time zone in order for it to be accurate. I don't want to fuck around with it too much because I'm worried I might damage the internal mechanism.

>>62436499
Depends what GMT but you can 100% set it to what ever you want. Just look up the instructions, it's pretty easy.

>>62436290
I cant get over the size of the crown. Its retardedly large. Ruins the whole thing.

File: 20170813_013632.jpg (2MB, 2650x1189px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2650x1189px

>>62435292
Just go with it

>>62437123
fuuuuuuark that one is fucked up

File: 1487613211000.jpg (41KB, 750x722px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 750x722px

This is my favorite song and rendition thereof.

What type of watch would you recommend for me based on this ?


https://youtu.be/V1bFr2SWP1I

File: 61+5h0lY7EL._UL1500_.jpg (202KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 1500x1500px

>>62437228

>>62437228
Denzel Washington® watch with rainbow nato strap

>>62437324
D'you know the reference number for that? I don't normally like tonneau cases but that's pretty nice.

File: 1500965592785.png (299KB, 478x463px) Image search: [Google]

299KB, 478x463px

>>62437812