>logicucks will defend this

>>62414602
oh great another whining audiophile

>>62414602
>when they have logitech 5.1 speakers but put the surroud speakers in the front
>and it's connected to a TV

>>62414602
lmao

>>62414602
topkek

File: 1503727215147.jpg (44KB, 460x573px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 460x573px

>>62414602
Yes, audiophool. I'll defend it.

What's the problem? He even admits that they "sound great for the money". It's better than having a real component in that spot and having the whole thing sound like shit. But again, Logitech is cheap stuff that's just a small step above average chinkshit in terms of component quality and durability. At the end of the day you still get what you pay for, faggot.

File: 1494158060024.jpg (92KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 1280x720px

>>62414602
This can't be true. Can anyone confirm?

>>62414602
Most likely bought a fake, the reals ones have tweeters. I know because they can fail and you just lose highs

>>62414640
>mfw moved my desk and lost the rear perch
>mfw i now dont have rear speakers just for this

>>62414602
Could we have a thread like that? Only with fake components in real products

File: fake-jpg[1].145432_.jpg (284KB, 1234x823px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 1234x823px

>>62415292

Get the cock out yo ears

>>62415292
>this absolute fool is so drunk on placebo he thinks he's losing phantom tweeters to solar flares

>>62414602
>logicucks
there's no way such a species exists

>>62415408
>chinked

File: $_86.jpg (67KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1024x768px

>>62415571
That guy got chinked hard. OP is a faggot.

>>62415658

This proves nothing you fucking retard