Best Way to Torrent Privately

...

>>62400287
>he uses pirate bay
Lmao

>>62400287
seedbox, look up good sites within your price range. They can get dmca requests too so don't seed shit like game of thrones.

>>62400492
What would you recommend downloading from instead of pirate bay?

>>62400530
If you wanna go the safest route, private ones like what.cd. Good luck getting an invite.

File: 1463150815182.gif (3MB, 640x266px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 640x266px

>>62400598
>>>62400530
>what.cd

use a VPN

use opevpn + your vpn proider config files.. then set windows firewall to only allow your torrent client .exe to work on public connections to make a killswitch

>>62400636
>>

>>62400646
*use a VPN you aren't hosting yourself
Also
>setting a killswitch at the windows level and not your router
what trash. your router should also be connecting to the VPN in the first place

>>62400598
>what.cd
>good luck getting an invite
Good luck resolving an http connection, for that matter

>>62400598
>join a small group to commit federal crimes vs a public group with millions of user with the chance of inefficient bureaucracy misses you.

>>62400530
Fags like him will recommend private trackers

NordVPN and private trackers.

>>62400287
Seedbox + sftp

>>62401346
i see where you're going but i've gotten suspended from my isp from downloading on kat yet ive never been burned on wcd or hdb
as long as people don't just give away invites to random people asking for them in ptg or on a sketchy forum this won't happen.

>>62400287
bare minimum to not get fucked over is to use a VPN while torrenting. i always recommend finding mega's and youtube-description-dropbox-files first before you start torrenting. if you must you should try to make some friends in the community of whatever you're into and seeing if anyone has an invite to a private tracker

also im very well aware i could be talking to NSA right now but im too tired to care

File: file.png (44KB, 1633x186px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 1633x186px

Someone explain this to me?

https://www.whitehouse.gov/legislation/sjres-34-joint-resolution-providing-congressional-disapproval-under-chapter-8-title-5

So what's a decently priced VPN services?
I just need to bypass blocked sites, I'm using the built-in opera VPN is that safe?

>>62400287
>americucks literally have to pay (for a VPN) to pirate
LMAO

>>62406225
Opera's vpn (well, its just a https proxy) is rented by opera from surfeasy, which is about as shady as any other paid public proxy like pia/dotvpn/hidemyass etc you see in first few google results.

So yea, its a decent deal if thats the sort of thing you're looking for.

>>62406411
Welp, I've been using it to access facebook.
Or is it safe?

So from what I understand OP was using a VPN from China and still got caught?
I have avast VPN to torrent, is that not enough to stop ISP warnings?

>>62406435
Can GFW detect what goes on (ie facebook) through that proxy? No, its a https proxy, its all encrypted, it's generally legit as far as hiding traffic from your isp.

I'm more surprised this stuff works through GFW, usually all the well known public proxies, paid or free, are pretty dead in china.

>>62406564
I know the ISP can't see what's happening.
I'm more concerned about credentials being leaked or be a victim for MiTM attack.

>>62406603
>credentials being leaked or be a victim for MiTM attack.

Only if your browse http websites. This goes for any proxy including tor, with http you trust the endpoints, which you generally shouldnt.

People were caught despite using vpns, simply because if you court subpoena a company, it must comply and start logging client traffic under gag order.

But generally only if people did some serious shit (ie fraud, hacking and such).

But for piracy or china tier censorship is somewhat unhread of, as that is too difficult to detect through the usual automation these state botnet systems do, and too many people use it.

i2p

>>62406669
So you mean even if I use shady VPN, as long I browse HTTPS sites, it should be OK?

>>62406701
Use common sense.

Depends how much shady. There are definitely some honeypots out there, chinese famously infested android market with backdoored VPNs, "mastervpn" and shit like that, google did crackdowns on those recently.

The problem was simply the app itself had shit snooping on you, in addition to routing traffic to mainland VPN entrypoint - which is always super suspicious - hows that supposed to bypass GWF again? Bottom line, it somehow did.

So yea, don't install suspicious software. But openvpn config for some windows 2000 softether server in finland, or https opera proxy in germany? Always a good place for torrenting if your government is assblasted about retarded shit like piracy or facebook.

>>62406784
I'm not OP, so not interested in torrenting.
Also I was wondering if these are safe to use to browse facebook and stuff like that.
https://www.sslproxies.org/

>>62403949
>as long as people don't just give away invites to random people asking for them in ptg or on a sketchy forum this won't happen


Are you kidding? The only people who have the ability to jump through hoops and mod dick on private trackers are neets and people who get paid for it. They will eventually figure it out anyway

>>62406827
These are scanned proxies. Not overly bad, but generally slow, shitty and not encrypted (that website is just some bullshit marketing to sell you lists of scanned/botnet proxies).

No, proxylists are meh these are very slow, unencrypted - its just random garbage people scanned gaping open on the internet, its mostly used only for spam and fraud.

https proxy means you connect to the proxy itself with https, and it's typically not an open proxy either (ie you need to get l/p for the proxy somehwere). Which is what things like opera vpn does. You can rip the opera auth credentials and use it with anything else - other browser, bittorrent and so on:

https://github.com/machineloop/oprah-proxy

Another free good proxies is vpngate (actual openvpn configs), dotvpn, touchvpn - all can be ripped from the extension with some cs 101.

>>62406941
>not encrypted
So the ISP can still see what I'm connecting to? right?
But the credentials are still safe as long I use HTTPS sites?