Are these in parallel?

>>62383636
>>/sqt/
And yes they are

looks more like their in horizontal.

They are entangled

File: 1491183962139.gif (426KB, 372x260px) Image search: [Google]

426KB, 372x260px

>>62383660
>>62383668
>>62383707
Who "they" are..?

>>62383764
Is English your first language?

>>62383943
Clearly not

>>62383764
Whomst"ed they've're are

>>62383967
'They' can be used for objects, as well as people.

I'm not really sure, but tecnically I think it's in series

>>62383988
/thread

>>62384032
This.

File: 1501483656165.png (219KB, 429x367px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 429x367px

>>62383764

It's basically one wire that splits into two resistors and then back to one wire. That should put them in parallel, unless you're a cheeky sod and insulated those wires to troll us.

>>62383636
If the wires are uninsulated then yes.

If they are insulated and you connect one of the pairs of wires together and then use the 2 wires on the other end then they are in series.

If you connect both wires of both ends together then they are in parallel.

>>62383636
on DC low freq model they are, on high freq they aren't cuz you added an extra parasitic coils there.

>>62383636
>asking /g/ about a hardware question

depends on the polarity

>>62383636
yes

>>62391919
>1/10

>>62383636
they are in proximity

>>62383636
Yes, and rascistors have no /pol/arity.

Also, those twists will act as significant inductors under ac

It's depend in how are you looking them. If you connect an Ohm meter to the pins there will be in parallel. If you put both terminal in one part of the circuit they're will be in serie.

File: download (2).jpg (7KB, 201x251px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 201x251px

>>62383988
I always preferred the more eloquent and efficient 'thems'

>>62383636
thems in parallel
>>62383707
thems entangled
>>62383668
thems sideways
>>62391571
thems coupled
>>62392914
thems close

The real question is how many Henry that is.