>adored shills 1080 should cost 300$ because its midrange

AMD prices are high because of miners but RX 570 was supposed to be out for $170 otherwise.

Anyway yeah $300 would be fair for the 1080 desu. The Vega 64 is already $500 msrp and is already 50% faster than the gtx 1080 with the newest primitive shader enabled drivers.

But yeah it's all moot right now because of buttcoin miners.

>>62367307
They can sell their products whatever price they want.

>>62367455
Only their reference cooler cards. After that it's up to the msi, gigabyte, xfx, powercooler, ect jews to decide how much they'll screw you over

>>62367489
Their main product is chip, which they can set to their heart's content.

Without heavily inflated margins they could still sell it at $300 and be competitive while making a decent profit. But hey, they can still sell about 80% as many at $500 with the scarcity of stock of their one competitor and rake in the profit so why not.

AMD's launch was bad/late/rushed enough even without all NVidia's shills so now they go and release this bullshit memory costs going up excuse to raise prises even more

1080 is midrange shit in pascal line-up. prove me wrong faget

>>62367418
>The Vega 64 is already $500 msrp and is already 50% faster than the gtx 1080
Source

File: Comb23082017023226.jpg (255KB, 1280x1440px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 1280x1440px

>>62367551
>>The Vega 64 is already $500 msrp
see amds official statement and slides

>and is already 50% faster than the gtx 1080
>Source
stuff like pic related is already happening between the 1070 and vega 56

File: GimmeYourLongclawJonSnow.png (280KB, 475x570px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 475x570px

If AMD won't neither will Nvidia. AMD gave Nvidia full reign, they just suck.

>>62367572
>Dirt 4
Nice cherry picking. Untill it happens on a multitude of games it isn't of any significance.
>just wait

>>62367307
they would not be allowed to do that because AMD would sue them for anti competitive behavior
>buhu nvidia undersells at a retarded level to kill of the competition helps me governments

>>62367572
>stuff like pic related is already happening between the 1070 and vega 56
That literally is not a source showing that the 64 is 50% faster than a 1080. Fucking kill yourself, retard

>>62367572
>Dirt 4
Hahaha why do you always post the same game

>>62367691
The funny part is that they undersell to try his best to get market share back but between miners buying them all up and they're being shit for games they can't get anything

>>62367307
If you go by die size 300$ would be appropriate and Nvidia would still make decent profit.

literally where do you buy shit at these prices?

If gaymers want to buy your GeForces at $1000, why not go for it?

Expect three "Titan" cards in a single generation some time soon.

With Adoredshill's logic, the 360mm2 7970 should be $300 instead of $549

See how stupid Adoredshill is? Typical retarded Pajeet with stupid accent that doesn't know shit

>>62367307
i can guarantee you nvidia are working on improving their mining hashes for the next generation.

if you believe corporations give a shit about you, you are retarded.

>>62367307
he is saying Nvidia's tech lead is massive and that they only sell "midrange" GPUs at high end prices because there is no competition to punish that move

if Nvidia sold with the same margins AMD does then AMD would get destroyed so horribly we would remember it for decades

>>62369174
yes adored shill is retarded

>>62367307
Adored is a moron

More news at 11

File: 4f8.jpg (25KB, 338x358px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 338x358px

>>62367418
>The Vega 64 is already $500 msrp and is already 50% faster than the gtx 1080 with the newest primitive shader enabled drivers.

source or gtfo, shill

File: egg-and-sperm1.jpg (23KB, 300x258px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 300x258px

>>62367307