[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Just got these from the Apple Store :^) Find a flaw. >protip

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 80
Thread images: 12

File: MMEF2_AV5.jpg (108KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]
MMEF2_AV5.jpg
108KB, 1000x1000px
Just got these from the Apple Store :^)

Find a flaw.

>protip

You can't.
>>
GIVE
>>
IT
>>
Let's start with the most obvious one: looks like you have perm qtips in your ear

BACK
>>
>>62360702
>>62360710

I paid for them with my hard earned money :\
>>
They sell nigger hands at the apple store?
>>
JAMAL
>>
File: 1500928175846.gif (359KB, 640x636px) Image search: [Google]
1500928175846.gif
359KB, 640x636px
>>62360693
>>protip
>You can't.

>He unironically says "pro-tip you can't"
You need to go back to /b/ kiddo.
>>
>>62360693
Bluetooth = latency

Sure it's fine for not recording audio but try watching a video
>>
>>62360693
batteries
shit blutooth compression shit
can easily lose them
overpriced
>>
>>62360720
>this coming from a frogposter
>>
>>62360722
this

Plus - mediocre sound
>>
>>62360693
Shouldn't the palms be pink? I've never seen all black hands, which begs the question: did Apple Marketing dye some cracker's hands dark brown so they could appear to be catering to the diversity crowd?
>>
I cant find a flaw. Congratulations on your purchase OP! Remember the AirPods are fine tuned to work perfectly with your iPhone 7, iPad Pro, iMac and MacBook Pro so be sure to purchase those next.
>>
>>62360722
Latency is in the order of milliseconds and unnoticeable.

>>62360731
If you're listening to music on your fucking phone you're going to have mediocre sound anyway.

Aux In was a fucking stale meme and I'm glad it's dead. I bet all you fags complaining also whined about losing Caset players in cars and floppy drives in computers.
>>
>>62360693
Congratulations! You are now officially a member of The Massive Faggot Club!
>>
>>62360754
>whined about losing Caset players in cars and floppy drives in computers

What are you? 12? I'm still whining we don't get vinyl players in cars anymore.
>>
>>62360728
The frog was for OP, you dumb asshole
>>
bluetooth gives you cancer
>>
>>62360754
Why would you buy the most expensive bluetooth option possible, especially when its sound is noticeably worse than other bluetooth options?
>>
>>62360791
u mad dumb retard
>>
File: 1502077533139.png (315KB, 383x348px) Image search: [Google]
1502077533139.png
315KB, 383x348px
>>62360791
You sound defensive. I guess it wasn't for OP
>>
>>62360754
Seriously, I say this as someone who would never buy an apple phone, the hatred for the removal of the headphone jack is not justified

it's a fucking 100 year old analog standard that NEEDS to go

the ONLY thing good about it is how universal it is, and I guess that it can rotate 360 degrees
>>
why do people buy that?
>>
File: fuckoff.png (7KB, 1024x485px) Image search: [Google]
fuckoff.png
7KB, 1024x485px
>>62360824
>>62360834
>>
File: SoHipAndTrendyAndFashionable.jpg (52KB, 970x536px) Image search: [Google]
SoHipAndTrendyAndFashionable.jpg
52KB, 970x536px
>>62360693
>>
>>62360854
>that NEEDS to go
Why does it need to go? Because it is old? The wheel is also "round and old".
>>
>>62360854
Its expensive for replacements though and completely unnecessary. I've exclusively bought Apple phones the entire time I've used smartphones, but my brand loyalty means nothing because I completely disagree with this shit. The reason they give for the headphone jack removal is "thinness" which is like wow who the fuck cares when you're going to have a phone case and screen protector on the shit because it costs $1000. (Not for me though because I would never buy a new smartphone, thats for human memeings[humans which are memes]) This is a cash grab by Apple, nothing more nothing less. If you fail to see this you're blind.
>>
>>62360693
Poor sound quality.
>all bluetooth headphones sound bad
It's a common flaw.
>>
>>62360964
>The reason they give for the headphone jack removal is "thinness"
New no-jack iPhone is as thick as the old iPhone. They lied.
>>
>>62360693
>find a flaw

easy. no apt-x. applels latest wireless buds use a decade old SBC A2DP protocol.
>>
File: mesopotamian-wheel.jpg (47KB, 424x373px) Image search: [Google]
mesopotamian-wheel.jpg
47KB, 424x373px
>>62360854
Same.
Don't give two shits about Apple, but they had the right idea here axing the 3.5mm jack. It's utterly unnecessary to hold on to ancient analog standards just to satisfy the .001% of autists who want to do studio mixing on their phones.

>>62360950
Ah yes the wheel has never undergone any transformations.
I've had pic related in my car for eons and no person in their right mind would ever swap this out for the rubber jew.
>>
>>62360992
What's the benefit in axing the 3.5mm jack? Does it improve the rest of the hardware in any way?
>>
>>62361003
Bigger battery, waterproofing?
>>
>>62360979
>applels latest wireless buds use a decade old SBC A2DP protocol.

No they fucking don't you retard.

It uses AAC 44Khz 16bit at 320Kbps.

That's how it shows up on my Mac.
>>
>>62361013
>On my Mac
>Apple ear buds
>Ear buds in general

It is just an apple fanboy that is too cucked to see reason. Nothing to see here folks. /thread
>>
>>62361010
There are already waterproof phones with 3.5mm jacks. The battery in the iPhone has not gotten any bigger since the jack's removal. Having bigger batteries in phones is not dependent on the jack's removal either. And obviously BT drains the battery faster than analog so the point is moot anyway.
>>
File: 14072658732691.jpg (104KB, 410x271px) Image search: [Google]
14072658732691.jpg
104KB, 410x271px
>>62360693
>everyone have the same sized ear
This is why headphones are superior.
>>
File: Captcha - School Nigs.png (147KB, 571x467px) Image search: [Google]
Captcha - School Nigs.png
147KB, 571x467px
>>62360922
Looks like his brain is melting out of his ears.
>>
>>62360693
commercial spam and advertising is not only against the rules, but also unethical
>>
>>62361052
99.9% of headphones are one-size fits all as well. You have to get one of the decent .1% to have a custom size.
>>
>>62361010
This is false. Sony makes phones that already have a bigger battery and they are waterproof. They also have a headphone jack.
>>
>>62361066
He cannot help it. Apple brainwashed him to be their unpaid shill.
>>
>>62361044
>The battery in the iPhone has not gotten any bigger since the jack's removal.

That's wrong.

>iPhone 6S Plus: 2,750 mAh
>iPhone 7 Plus: 2915 mAh


>>62361072
I'm sure OP meant in relation to the iPhone itself. Do the Sony phones have the same footprint as the 7?
>>
>>62361010
One of which Apple hasn't done and the other is irrelevant because waterproof 3.5mm jacks exist.

So it's not thinner, the battery is not bigger, and it isn't any more waterproof than it would otherwise be.

Give one (1) advantage Apple customers have gained since the removal of the 3.5mm jack.

If you can't, you're admitting Apple removed a feature for no consumer benefit.
>>
>>62361092
see https://www.macrumors.com/2016/09/15/iphone-7-plus-teardown-ifixit/
>>
Needs to be charged.
>>
Like most Apple products, the price. If I could grab them for $80 on Amazon, they would be a legitimately competitive little device.
Pricing them the same as the professional hardware I own, though? Nah, I'll use the regular-ass Earpods when I don't give a shit, and actual headphones when I do.
>>
>>62361095
>The teardown confirms the 5.5-inch model has a2,900 mAh battery, which is just over 5% larger than the 2,750 mAh battery in the iPhone 6s Plus
So they got a margin-of-error improvement for removing a widely used standard? Wow. Impressive.

Oh your battery is from a slightly worse batch so it actually is slightly smaller, nothing personal kiddo, acceptable margin of manufacuturing error ;)
>>
>>62361083
Should have said due to the jack's removal. Point still stands. All of those are possible with the headphone jack while maintaining the thinness. So where's the benefit?
>>
>>62361113
Lmao there's no winning this conversation with you, is there? I point directly to a move made because of the removal of the jack and you'll hand wave it?

Also, the Taptic Engine was added. And don't even bother commenting on it if you haven't used it, because it is genuinely much better and different than a regular vibration motor.

>>62361117
How do you make the battery bigger while maintaining the phone's original footprint without removing internal devices? Battery technology has not improved since last year.
>>
>>62361113
"better" vibrator supposed to be the benefit
>>
>>62361138
Not anyone you're responding to, just hopping in to say that there is no excuse for your $700-$1000 device not being as capable as a portable DVD player from the 90's. There's no excuse for it not being able to do what children's toys can do. If companies can make devices for under $10 that can find room for a headphone jack, then Apple engineers making six figures should be able to do the same.
>>
>>62361138
>because it is genuinely much better and different than a regular vibration motor.
Is this post satire or what

>without removing internal devices?
Improving the design of the layout or the other internal devices.
Galaxy S6 to S7 had a 17% improvement in battery size while overall reducing the footprint.
>>
>>62360693
Have fun when someone bumps you and your earbud eats shit.
>>
>falls out of ear lands on ground
>needs recharging
>heavier
>looks retarded
>>
>>62360693
I love Apple mobile devices. But those things look like Q tips hanging out of your ears, cost too much, and you'll lose at least one in the coming week.
>>
One fatal flaw: they're earbuds and not IEMs.
>>
My 8 driver customs eat these for breakfast.
>>
They look comfortable but expensive and gimmicky.
>>
>>62360693
flaw : they look extremely ridiculous
seen someone finally wearing a pair at the grocery store recently, and i just had to giggle
>>
>>62360693
Why for you black out your hands OP?
>>
how comfy is siri through those things? is it more useful
>>
>>62360693
>using the smiley with a carat nose
>>
>>62360693
Looks like something you should be stuffing up your twat instead of your ears
>>
File: robbery.jpg (36KB, 600x420px) Image search: [Google]
robbery.jpg
36KB, 600x420px
>>62360693
Hey, thanks for telling me about MY new iphone 7 with your earbuds.
>>
>>62360722
straight up real talk here. I've tried playing games on my laptop using bluetooth speakers, and it was bad. After using airpods, it's for real like 0 latency, they work great for movies and games, unlike my harmon kardon bluetooth speaker
>>
>>62360992
>.001%?
Are you retarded
Most of the world still uses wired headphones because wireless technology and batteries suck
>>
>>62361914
xD
>>
>>62360716

So then show us the receipts, iTyler
>>
>recompressing lossy compressed audio
>>
>>62360693
I can't even find my own, give it back tyrone
>>
>>62361013
>>62361013
>No they fucking don't you retard.

MP4 is a part of SBC protocol inside the A2DP spec. It ain't got shit on apt-x or LDAC

Don't call me a retard when I was perfectly correct you little shiteater.
> the current state of applel shills on this board
>>
File: image.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
2MB, 4032x3024px
>ITT: Poorfags who don't own a pair of AirPods.

Hope you enjoy them OP, I love mine.
>>
>>62360693
Dude, your hand are like burned or something. I'm so sorry, hope your insurance does cover that.
>>
>>62364321
must be nice to br able to spend other people's tax money on overpriced trash
>>
>>62360693
>WIRELESS
also (You)
>>
There's literally a new version getting announced tomorrow.

You wasted your money.
>>
>>62360714
TYRONE
>>
File: airdog.gif (3MB, 690x388px) Image search: [Google]
airdog.gif
3MB, 690x388px
>>62364321
Thread posts: 80
Thread images: 12


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.