How dangerous is this shit?
>>62358841
yea its the best thing since hotpockets xoxo
Welcome to 1998. Even dubious PDF files are dangerous if you don't have an antivirus.
>>62358877
>Even dubious PDF files are dangerous if you don't have an antivirus.
t.wintoddler
>>62358904
would you make an virus for an op system nobody uses?
t.brainlet
>>62358904
How's those GStreamer buffer overflows going?
Vulnerabilities happen anywhere, and a malicious webm can compromise your system.
You don't need root to zip files for ransomware.
>>62358929
What if my files are archived in the root account?
>>62358951
I'd commend you for your autism having to type your password for any change every day.
Yes. If it's not some framework bloat the designers put in, its obscured ad scripts (usually spyware).
Read this if you would like to know more:
http://idlewords.com/talks/website_obesity.htm
Start making slim, web 1.0 websites with minimal bloat. Fight the framework cancer and the ad companies that fuel it.
>>62358904
t. shit for brains
>>62358915
I made a virus for fun back in college, it deleted user settings on OS X 10.5 ¯\(ツ)/¯.
All javascript is malware
>>62358904
It's a feature of PDF. Your firefox/icecat/all-in-one media wrapper is not safe from PDF.