How smart is /g/ these days? Post results. We're doing

Not clicking that botnet virus shit

File: 1491395899153.jpg (50KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 1280x720px

>entire website loaded through non-free javascript

>>62316010
this is official norway's mensa website you brainlet. you scored 0

File: IMG_20170908_181604.jpg (228KB, 1080x1851px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 1080x1851px

>>62315965

File: image.jpg (720KB, 1242x2208px) Image search: [Google]

720KB, 1242x2208px

Pfft

File: 캡처 아이큐.jpg (30KB, 659x511px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 659x511px

>tfw brainlet

>>62315965
Around 115-125 if I had to guess.

>>62315965
>le test where everyone scores 120+
nah

>>62316620
I scored 89.

>>62316651
did you pruposefully click the wrong answers? thats worse than random

>>62316592

I got 119. lol, you're a retard m8

I got 130 and I couldn't even complete all the things

IQ doesn't mean anything, I always get ridiculous high IQs, and I am retarded as shit

>>62315965
"Your IQ lies outside the area that the test is able to measure."
so, you are all retards

>>62316620
It's accurate to mensa paid exams. Just Google this exam if u need proof. Or are you afraid is going to shatter your self image as an intelligent person?

>>62315965
131

>>62315965
Kek, mensa is pretty much a pseudo-intellectual club where faggots masturbate to each other's ego.
Name me one mensa member that actually did shit
Also, IQ != intellegence. It merely shows you your potential at best

File: a.jpg (23KB, 428x158px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 428x158px

>>62315965
tfw to inteligent for this shit

>>62315965
According to 12 online tests I average at 139. According to the test I took at my phycologist, 142.

>>62318796
Inb4 lower than measurable

ITT everyone is very smart in the 90+ percentile

File: wat.jpg (29KB, 509x483px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 509x483px

can someone explain me this one? I didn't understand it

>>62318823
It's two black on left side

>>62318823
The third picture is the sum of the previous two, on th and left side it's a positive amount on th left it's negative. On the first row it's +1 black -3 white, +2white -1 black, so the third image is 0 black and -1 white

>>62318823
solve vertically, left - right and left+left right + right, anwser is 2 black dots on left.

>>62318809
this desu, i always considered my self stupid compared to others and somehow every tests i get 125+, i also suck in math.
>tfw power engineer

>>62318909
>>62318920
oohh, got it

Fucking auto correct is the worst

The third picture is the sum of the previous two, on the left side it's a positive amount and on the right it's negative. On the first row it's +1 black -3 white, +2white -1 black, so the third image is 0 black and -1 white. On the second row iit's +1 black -3 white, then +2 white - 1 black so the sum is just -1 white in th last picture

>>62318909
This anon is genius or looked up the solution.

>>62318738
Mensa paid tests are shit. They only test pattern recognition skills (and even that poorly), ignoring other kinds of IQ. Professional tests, even if flawed, are far faaar better than that from Memesa circlejerky fucks.

And no, I'm not salty because I've got a low score from them, I've got 148 points. Part of the reason why I consider it worthless.

File: muhdick.png (13KB, 685x419px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 685x419px

i have no job and live with my parents at 27 LOL

>>62318964
Sadly I'm only good at math and logic, I was always shit at English and trying to articulate ideas

>>62318964
most of those are not hard, you just need to see connections between pictures and solve by comparsion. Given enough time and thought you will solve anything like this, the time you take determines how intelligent you are and the time you are willing to spend determines your autism power level.

>>62318984
>I'm lazy + a loser
>LOL

okay mister

File: IMG_20170908_205908.jpg (2KB, 150x149px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 150x149px

One of your botnets has been updated to the newest version

>>62319064
That LOL is a cry for help

File: DFBWSJTVYAEFWJK.jpg:large.jpg (317KB, 1536x2048px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 1536x2048px

>>62315965
121
>>62318771
No, IQ is the most accurate measurement of a psychological concept we call intelligence and intelligence is what we call your ability to learn, use logic and have be verbally fluent. The last one wasn't tested with this IQ test.
Of course it has it's faults and errors (like any measurement) but it's still useful for whoever cares about this kind of stuff. It's good enough, our best estimate.

File: Screen Shot 2017-09-08 at 2.05.05 PM.png (33KB, 719x523px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 719x523px

The last one took me a while to get, I'll admit.

>>62319113
>have be
this is why my score is lower than anyone elses here

File: Screen Shot 2017-09-08 at 21.06.34.png (175KB, 1518x1226px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 1518x1226px

>>62315965
>http://test.mensa.no/
/pol/ reporting in

>inb4 fake, we practised those thousands of times since we care about IQ

File: ss-2017-09-08-21-07-16.png (66KB, 1152x784px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1152x784px

135

File: Screenshot_20170908-154700.png (152KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1080x1920px

(its not the right age range tho lol)

>>62315965
I am pretty dumb fampai, won't waste 25 minutes to confirm that.

Anyone that believes their score from an online test is accurate can subtract 50 from their score for their real IQ

>>62319814
good thing I got 180

File: kkkzsrzu5yez.jpg (83KB, 748x748px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 748x748px

>those last questions
What the fug

>>62319866
which one you had trouble with, brainlet?

File: 1d9f7a0128189e42487500328b0684e507dfdbaab9f7c72b1de43253a3242235.jpg (47KB, 645x968px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 645x968px

>>62319911
33 & 35

clicked completely randomly and got 95

test is bs

File: 33.jpg (28KB, 440x473px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 440x473px

>>62320034
In the second row the figures are split in the middle, in the third one, the right half is flipped horizontally and then vertically.

File: 35.jpg (27KB, 390x485px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 390x485px

>>62320034
Oh, and this one. Yeah, I don't know what the fuck is going on here.

File: absolute retard.jpg (33KB, 1142x177px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 1142x177px

>>62318796
Hahahahahaha, this guy thought he was a genius!

To get quickly to 33 and 35 to post these >>62320137 >>62320160 , I just clicked always on the same option without caring about choosing wrong. I finished it like this after 35 to see what the score would say. Meaning the result was absolute dogshit, turns out that message is just Mensa's way of avoiding telling you that you are braindead!

>135

No way Im that smart, shit test.

File: 1480702845363.jpg (56KB, 645x773px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 645x773px

>>62320137
Damn, it's real simple

REEEEEEEE FUCKING FIREFOX KLAR CAN'T TAKE SCREENSHOT!!!
Anyhow, I got 130 IQ, 97,7 percentile

>>62320160
yeah I swear this one is just random shit

>>62315965
smarter than /pol/ and /v/ dumber than /sci/ and /his/

comfy middle

>>62320160
>>62320478
okay nevermind, it's just the standard "hide where there's overlap and leave where there isn't" with some additional bulshit flipping or whatever. also its done by columns and not by rows. I shouldn't have given up because I still had time

>>62316620
No. Like all IQ test threads it's
>le test where almost exclusively people who score 120+ comment on their scores because the others don't bother so it gives you the false impression that everyone scores 120+ when in fact it's probably like 20% of those who take it

>>62318771
>You're so intelligent that you should join our sekrit club! Gib membership fees pls and we'll send you four magazines a year and a little card for your wallet

It is literally in their financial interest to accept everyone. The only genius in Mensa is whoever started it.

>>62320160
>>62320568
the upper one needs to be flipped horizontally in place and then you overlay the lower one I think. so it should be answer 6.

>>62320586
yep, textbook selection bias

>>62318771
>Also, IQ != intellegence. It merely shows you your potential at best
this test measures fluid intelligence. there's also crystalized intelligence but they're highly correlated

File: Screenshot_2017-09-08-22-50-07_org.mozilla.firefox.png (159KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 1080x1920px

>>62320478
Nope its like graphical bit inversion but upper row is flipped horizontaly.

Also my official mensa test was worth 136 5 yrs ago so pretty accurate I think...

>>62320160
Bitwise XOR. Each third image consists of lines that are only in one of the first two images. Tripfags don't know bitwise logic, who knew?

File: tfw suicide.jpg (43KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 633x758px

>tfw 86
You told me vidya was going to make me more intillegent, /g/. I stayed away from the Linux meme and this is what I get???

File: sortasmrt.png (13KB, 640x404px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 640x404px

>>62320756
I scored lower on this than on an actual IQ test which had me at 120. Woo.

>>62320841
All I've ever done is play vidya and make 3d models for $$$ anon. I still scored 122 on this.

File: brainlet.jpg (30KB, 661x491px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 661x491px

>>62320756
I scored 133, checkmate Anonymous

File: Screenshot_2017-09-08-22-12-34-1-1.png (56KB, 720x691px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 720x691px

>tfw to smart too get a job, move out my parents house or maintain friendships

>>62320993
You think your intelligent when you claim ``too smart'' is a thing that keeps you from doing stuff that is not important?

File: edited tears of laughter emoji.jpg (39KB, 600x605px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 600x605px

>>62321039
>Those speech marks
10/10 rusemanship

>>62320841
t. Drumpfy

File: graph.png (9KB, 634x412px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 634x412px

I feel dumb for not completing the last 4 questions didn't manage my time effectively

File: Implying the Test is Accurate.png (53KB, 912x778px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 912x778px

Evidently the warning that it's inaccurate is true. I'm half-asleep and sped through it (not to mention a dumb phoneposter).

Since we're in a high IQ thread, would you guys give us some insight into matters of the world? About ayys, pyramids, goolag, or the universe? Or vaccines? Or Illuminati? The uncertainty principle? CS topic? Anything you want. I'm really curious about what you guys at 140 and more think.
t.128 brainlet.

File: coaxed into a snafu.png (27KB, 579x518px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 579x518px

Maybe the real IQ test is just testing if we bother to complete it once we realise that it's pretty much just the same question over and over again?

>tfw we all failed

File: palemoon_2017-09-08_22-47-50.png (18KB, 714x517px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 714x517px

I've never done a real IQ test, but this looks like bullshit. Basically the first 15 questions were like "look it rotatted", then the rest were "look it's overlaaayd" and/or "look it's fleeeped".

The only one I failed to answer was 33, and 35 took me a ton of time to figure out. But it's also 11pm, I'm half naked and horny.

>>62321446
I'm sorry only anons with IQ 130+ can understand the secrets of our existence

>>62319866
You can get reactions when the dog's saliva touches your skin anywhere, brainlet

>>62321446
>ayys
In the age of camera phones, sightings have actually gone down. This implies that most sightings are bullshit. However, sightings increased drastically after World War 2 and throughout the 1950s and 1960s, which was precisely when there were a lot of nuclear blasts and bomb tests, which are visible from space.
>pyramids
It was absolutely possible to build them with human power and nothing else.
>goolag
In the future, all companies will be like Google. But I'm curious to see if we can ever pay for groceries by handing over our email address.
>the universe
Nice to look at, but there's not much point trying to explore it when anything worth exploring is unreachably far away.
>vaccines
Anti-vaccination rhetoric all stems from Andrew Wakefield, a man who has been struck off as a doctor because his research was so flawed.
>Illuminati
It's scarier to think that nobody is actually in control, which is the real truth.
>uncertainty principle
Why does the universe owe us certainty? If we can't handle ambiguity, that's on us.
>CS topic
With computers, we have all effectively been promoted to being the boss of several peons; it's just that the several peons are virtual. No-brainer jobs are disappearing, and aren't being replaced. Universal Basic Income is a good way to fix this, but I don't think it would work because too many people would still want to supplement their income by continuing to work.

File: mensa_test.png (18KB, 678x500px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 678x500px

Probably not accurate though

>>62321611
How old are you? Because if this is your insight with an 140+ IQ, you are fucking retarded.

File: FuckingLie.png (7KB, 1096x83px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 1096x83px

>>62315965
I answered with one of the choices for the entire test and I just got this. Why do people even believe these things again?

121. I ran out of time on the last one.

>>62321803
It's politely telling whoever got that legit they're retarded

Smart enough to not take an online IQ test.

>>62321914
Do you feel that if a shrink charges you $200 to do an exact copy of this test in his office, it makes it more valid?

>>62322019
It wouldn't be this exact test. It would be way different.

>>62322019
What kind of shrink? Psychololgists are mostly worthless, I've gotten better insights from speaking to raccoons. Psychiatrics can at least give me funny pills or other benefits.

>>62322081
Shrinks are psychiatrists, it's their nickname. Dumbass.

>>62320646
Fuck. I hate this. I eliminated that pattern because the first column doesn't seem to match that. Because the upper patterns left side looks too long to not leave anything.

My IRL IQ tests were in a different format than this but I was a child at the time. I remember being tested on sequence of events and had to put pictures in order of how they would have made a story and explain why. Real IQ test seemed like it might be a little subjective tbqh

>>62320993
you're lacking in other traits

>>62321803
you didn't do the test correctly so it obviously can't assign you a score. what don't you understand?

>>62322398
>you're lacking other traits
Me, you and everyone else including anon knows he knows this.

Why mention it?

File: mensa.png (20KB, 731x521px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 731x521px

>>62315965
How'd I do /g/?

>>62322436
some people unironically don't

>>62318964
It took me a minute but it is pretty simple.
It's basically just addition and subtraction.
Go top down.
In the first column the white squares on the left from the first box cancel out the white squares on the right in the second box, the two black squares add.
In the second column the white squares on the right cancel the white squares on the left, the black square on the left cancels the black square on the right, so its empty.
Third column, the white square on the right cancels the white square on the left, so two black squares on the left.

>>62322451
Did we have anyone below IQ 100 yet?

>>62319166
>we practiced thousands of times
Oh, so it is fake.
>practicing IQ tests

>>62320232
I got 91 by clicking random answers

File: SHIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET.png (18KB, 712x520px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 712x520px

SHIEEEEEEEEET

>>62322499
I don't know, but I'm sure there's plenty of consumerist/youtube/v/pol 14-year-olds here who would score below 100 under adult age adjustment

>>62321507
>35 took me a ton of time to figure out
You really are a brainlet.

>>62322529
Mh, tfw using the port 25% people were making random choices they would be more intelligent than if they were thinking by themselves. So does that show that monkeys can be way smarter than humans?

>>62322505
My mom did this in a structural way by studying IQ tests from a library book before getting hired by IBM (back when they hired by IQ tests).
She got ~10 IQ points better compared to the results earlier that week. Not a broad study exactly but there you go.
>>62322553
Suppose a kid could believe solving puzzles is all you need.
>>62322550
Ouch.

>>62322584
I do think that means humans can be more stupid than monkeys. Happens all the time though. We're very self-confident in bad information. I don't remember where but someone did tests on western European social studies students perception of the economical/social/political situation of the world and it showed that what they're taught makes them worse than monkeys at picking the correct answer and they were 4 choice.
No /pol/ shit. Its mostly the idea that every place outside of Europe and NA is a shithole being taught. That was my assessment from the questions anyway.

>>62322505
>>62322585
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3950413/
>Most recent studies that have claimed increases in intelligence after a cognitive training intervention rely on comparing an intelligence test score before the intervention to a second score after the intervention. If there is an average change score increase for the training group that is statistically significant (using a dependent t-test or similar statistical test), this is treated as evidence that intelligence has increased. This reasoning is correct if one is measuring ratio scales like inches, liters or grams before and after some intervention (assuming suitable and reliable instruments like rulers to avoid erroneous Cold Fusion-like conclusions that apparently were based on faulty heat measurement); it is not correct for intelligence test scores on interval scales that only estimate a relative rank order rather than measure the construct of intelligence.

>>62320417
>130
>can't figure out how to take a screenshot
Now I know this test is shit

>>62322584
No, that's just a flaw with multiple choice tests.

>>62322653
So basically, bullshit?

File: 1496117855260.png (66KB, 695x500px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 695x500px

IQ tests r dumb
t. ebin smart guy

>>62321507
Try someone you don't hold in great esteem intellectually. See what they score. Average people cannot figure out half the rotation and flipping shit. They see no pattern. To you, it is trivial. To them, there is no recognizable pattern.

125 here, same as 20 years ago.

>135
Surprised I did that well desu. A lot of the questions were kind of frustrating and I guessed on several of them since I couldn't be bothered to figure out how they were supposed to work. I have taken this same test once before so that probably helped my score a little.

>>62322584
Actual problems have more than 4 possibilities. Try giving a monkey a math problem with a list of every whole number from -100 to 100

>>62322663
Or he's lying? Brainlets don't post their shit scores for a reason

>>62322666
not even a flaw. the score is completely meaningless if you don't do the test correctly

>>62322663
he's a phoneposter. they get adjusted so that 100 is average phoneposter iq. his 130 is equivalent to 95 for desktop users

>>62322653
I don't see how it could possibly be applicable to my mom seeing an increase comparing herself to a static book when she has consistently better results.
Anyway you should absolutely quote this part as its the core to the argument:
>[...]The scores likely are a bad estimate of the student's ability. If the student retakes the test sometime later when well, does an increase in score mean the student's intelligence has increased, or that the newer score is now just a better estimate?
>>62322709
Yes that's what's being said.

>>62322786
A big flaw is still a flaw, I'm not saying it's small.

File: Screenshot_20170909-012548.png (202KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 1080x1920px

>>62315965
I was part of Mensa for a year, what a bunch of self-entitled faggots.

>>62322809
>I don't see how it could possibly be applicable to my mom seeing an increase comparing herself to a static book when she has consistently better results.
it's not, I'm just wasting your time

>>62315965
Is this test timed? Is there a written portion? A culture fair portion? Multiple types of pattern analysis?

>>62322926
No >>62321507

>>62322920
Rude.
But that was a good read. And I waste my time all the time anyway.
I find the guy writing a bit snarky. Demanding a ratio scale of intelligence is just unrealistic. And his suggestion to measure the physiological just sounds completely unreasonable as it's also something we don't have a clue how to interpret reliably. His critique of studies he read is fine though. If they don't cover what he says they don't then they're pretty shit studies though.

>>62322926
>Is this test timed?
no

>Is there a written portion? A culture fair portion? Multiple types of pattern analysis?
no, one type of pattern analysis is enough to measure g factor. verbal intelligence and others are heavily correlated with g

File: Screen Shot 2017-09-08 at 19.36.52.png (43KB, 1170x791px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1170x791px

This is a bullshit test

>>62322897
I was thinking of taking the test and joining mensa for the networking possibilities. Meeting people, and seeing what fields they work on, and seeing if I can get some opportunities, or some connections that would help me, Do you think that's a good idea? What was your mensa experience like? Did you get to meet a lot of members?

File: 1495147543587.png (6KB, 472x508px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 472x508px

>>62323040
Do they do scolarships?

File: file.png (34KB, 694x491px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 694x491px

I don't get these two and they aren't mentioned in the thread so I'm sure you guys know the answer.

>>62322926
>culture fair
That's the entire test though, supposedly. And its Norway so I'm reasonably sure we can trust that.

What would a culture unfair test mean? Ignoring obvious things like pop culture references.
>>62323040
Likely you'd be able to network positively just about anywhere you can exclude morons. Not that guy but I'm not confident you'll find industrious types there. They attract people like athletes, people that feel a need to prove their worth through arbitrary challenge. No dig on athletes. They're just stereotyped as non-smart.

File: Screenshot_2017-09-08-19-42-40.png (140KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 1080x1920px

>brainlet
>Christmas treed the last 5 questions

>>62323063
Top left and bottom right?

>>62323040
Statistically 62 million first world people should have the capability to join MENSA but only 135 thousand are in it.

I'd say it'd be more hassle than it is worth. I'd also wager a large portion are underachieving in life and pay for membership to wank to their number.

>>62323091
And why would that be?

>>62321446
I'm bored so sure
>ayys
No evidence either way, and who gives a shit anyway. If they have advanced FTL tech to the point of colonising galaxies we're probably like ants to them, and if they don't we probably will never meet.
Besides, the universe is ~14 billion years old, how long to civilisations last for?
>pyramids
What about them
>goolag
Killed like 40 million people, and then they complain about Hitler.
Or if you're talking about the botnet, well my answer will be "da joos" because that's who is at the head of Google et al.
>vaccines
They're good but I don't know if introducing a pathogen, however neutered, into a baby is particularly healthy. Especially for vaccines which protect against rare or almost-eradicated deceases. There's not much reason not to wait a few years.
>illuminati
There's not some dark order of space lizards or whatever, it's just a bunch of really rich and power-hungry jews.
>the uncertainty principle
What's wrong with it?
>CS topic
I want to live in the 60s or 70s when CS was still serious, javascript didn't exist, and diversity wasn't being enforced in the tech industry.

>Anything you want
I want a fascist ethnostate

>>62323063
>34
You add column one and column two. The big box is the maximum, two small boxes make a big box. So it's option 5
>32
Rotate column 2 anticlockwise 45* and XOR the sides. So the answer is 4

That's assuming I'm not a brainlet of course

>>62323100
>34
Is addition with three small boxes equaling one large box.

>32
I'm just trying to find a pattern in moving lines and kind of guessing. The other two rows have two boxes with v patterns so I think it's either that or top left.

>>62318873
>>62318909
>>62318920
Well done. I remember having been stumped by this when I did this test a few months ago.

>>62323127
>The big box is the maximum
I didn't consider that option. I was trying to find another way that somehow involved summing or subtracting boxes depending on whether they are above or below the line in the column.

>Rotate column 2 anticlockwise 45* and XOR the sides. So the answer is 4
Huh, can't believe I didn't see that, some of the other xors were much trickier.

>>62323175
>Is addition with three small boxes equaling one large box.
So you think the answer is top left?

>>62323203
>So you think the answer is top left?
Yep

>>62323010
Scores here

>>62323127
>Rotate column 2 anticlockwise 45* and XOR the sides. So the answer is 4
Thanks. I fucked that one up.

I really dislike IQ tests because there's always multiple strategies that work. Math is easier. And a more useful skill imo.

File: shieeet.png (16KB, 714x444px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 714x444px

I couldn't even fini9sh it.
What the fuck is this even called? I always bombed the fuck out of this prediction shit in school and had to double up on other subjects to make up for it.

I'm surprised I even got this, I was thinking cannibal in the congo 80's was more likely.

>>62323223
>>62323127
3 6 1 3 1 1 5 2 6 4 2 3 1 5 6 5 4 2 5 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 4 5 3 6 1 4 3 1 6
These are my answers now, I'm always getting 143, doesn't matter what I answer for 34.
Apparently this anon got 145.

>>62323397
What country are you from?

>>62323416
>Apparently this anon got 145.
Forgot to link to >>62319166

I literally just clicked random answers and got a 110. What kind of shitty meme is this?

File: iq.png (24KB, 682x615px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 682x615px

>>62315965
Fuck.

>>62323436
Its called probability.
Look at >>62320056
Try to find the patterns and pick an anti-pattern.

119, and I am not very smart

>>62323107
Not all diseases are spread human to human. Just because a disease is "dead" in terms of contagious spread, doesn't mean it can't easily be reintroduced to the human population without the wall of vaccinated population standing in the way of its spread. Vaccinating against tetanus, for instance, is necessary since it is a constant.

File: 90.png (26KB, 878x573px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 878x573px

*smacks lips*
so you be sayan

>>62320056
>Doesn't understand that picking random answers will land you in the middle of the bell curve on any test

You really are a brainlet. I bet if you actually tried you'd get 60.

File: low iq.png (16KB, 802x449px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 802x449px

>>62323436
I purposely got everything wrong and got a 91 .... *thinking emoji*

I think time is a factor in the score so doing the test really fast and getting most things wrong gets a higher score

>>62323505
>spend more time using brain
>score lower

this test really does reflect our intelligence, a smart person would just get this shit over with

>>62323505
>>62323494
There has to be something up, like you can't score a 55 unless you just finish without answering or timing out without filling in a single one.

File: 1504813895866.jpg (41KB, 540x532px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 540x532px

>>62323539
I mean, not answering any of the questions is pretty believable behavior for someone who's retarded, so

>>62323342
it's not a skill. jesus this post is so retarded. we have our first <100 I guess

>>62323436
>I put my cat on a scale and it doesn't show my weight

>>62323539
these tests are not designed for retards (medically speaking). there are targeted diagnostic tests for that

File: bingbangbadaboom_nig.png (11KB, 676x517px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 676x517px

Am I retarded?

Seriously, like half of the questions were XOR tests?!?

>>62323436
What it shows is that you have to be legitimately stupid to do worse than average.

File: ss-2017-07-12-06-01-13.png (94KB, 1017x721px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 1017x721px

try this one faggots, I dare you

>>62323656
indeed, i got tired at 57% and just random picked one from then one. still got 110iq in the end. this shit is pure autism...

>>62323641
>its not a skill
A repeatable set of intelligent actions is not a skill? Amazing. I would never have known. Meanwhile most dictionaries define it as the ability to do something well.
Are you claiming that you people don't have the ability to do this well? I'd disagree.
If you don't even understand the English language then I should draw your attention to the proverbial idiom about the pot and the kettle.

I wouldn't be surprised if the answers were graded, so the correct answer carries the most weight while other answers that would be the result of misidentifying the patterns would get lower weights until there's one that's the absolute worst answer.

It just makes more sense to grade it this way.

>>62323778
fluid intelligence is a measure of ability to acquire new skills
crystallized intelligence is a measure of ability to use the acquired skills
so intelligence is more of a meta-skill. saying "math is a more useful skill" makes little sense in this context. especially because mathematical skill is highly correlated with intelligence

File: Screenshot_2017-09-08-21-49-13.png (252KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 1440x2560px

I don't know what to think of this. I finished with 7 mins to spare so maybe I rushed a little.

>>62323889
And I'm complaining about the measure while making a comment about the relative importance of what they measure.
Dense.

>>62315965
>IQ test
>http://
KEKEKEKEK

Apparently, you guys are fucking retarded.

>>62323909
no, what you did is show a misunderstanding of what iq is and then you got triggered that I called you sub-100

>>62323891
You're better than most people. Feel good about yourself.

>>62323749
116 and I skipped like 4 at the end because I wanted to see how long the test would go on for

>>62323949
No that's what you read you moron.

File: my iq.png (15KB, 665x428px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 665x428px

Well this is depressing. I only got 60% of the way through the test though before I ran out of time and just clicked randomly. I hate timed tests so much.

Raven's matrices are also terrible.There are multiple dimensions of IQ, Ravens matrices just test spacial reasoning. Which yes, does correlate well with other cognitive abilities. But not perfectly.

File: Screenshot from 2017-09-09 02-08-51.png (46KB, 1430x283px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 1430x283px

>>62315965
>tfw too intelligent for the iq test

>>62324011
it is

>>62324025
>There are multiple dimensions of IQ, Ravens matrices just test spacial reasoning. Which yes, does correlate well with other cognitive abilities. But not perfectly.
it correlates very strongly. in fact there is no better psychometric measurement of any kind

File: ss-2017-09-09-03-14-00.png (65KB, 678x570px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 678x570px

DAE WOMEN R STOOPID??? :--DDD

>>62324160
Women are so inferior loo
Weaker, less witty/funny, less intelligent, bleed for a week straight each month

Top laughs go out directed at women.

>>62324099
Either that or you are too stupid.

Seeing you didn't even consider the possibility you could be too far to the left I know what to rank you as.

File: iq.png (113KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1280x720px

>>62315965
The whole time I was thinking how it's definitely not accurate, but, psh, my thoughts have changed, suckas.


Feels good. :^)

File: cognitive abilities correlations.png (46KB, 508x570px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 508x570px

>>62324103
How strong is "very strongly". The highest correlation seems to be with vocabulary at .83, which isn't really that great. And with "picture completion" which is what I think ravens matrices are most similar to, it's only 0.68! And these abilities correlate with each other even less than with g.

File: Screen Shot 2017-09-08 at 21.27.42.png (82KB, 1423x684px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1423x684px

>>62323749
This was annoying af

>>62324200
>less funny
Its a shame. I watched yugioh abridged again for nostalgia reasons (sucks way more than when I was a teen) and every episode with a female voice actor in them just sucked all the fun out of it. They were either given really bad plain dialogue or the voices they made just weren't funny.
And it struck me. Outside of ventriloquist performances I've never heard a woman make funny voices. Trying to imagine the gender bender of the abridged shows or TFS is just not something I'm mentally capable of doing. Its so weird. I don't see any tangible reason why that'd be. All these shows have plenty of male VAs doing female characters to OK effect. But the opposite just doesn't work.
Also reminds me of the Ghostbusters movie. I don't know if its just poor direction or what's the deal but that was nowhere close to being funny. And its completely at odds with the original.
I want answers to this crap. I want funny women.

I call bullshit Im 27 never was a neet but never finished any degree and I have 135 sure dream on
>inb4 tard-norway-sjw-page tells every retard taking the test they are part of the 99 percentile

>>62324247
From a Quora user on that test:

>I scored 123 on that and scored 144 on the Scientifically Validated JCTI and 135 on the Mensa Finland.

>>62324099
I just clicked every first answer(presumably, all wrong), and that's what I got. Kek.

>>62324326
>degree
Anon you should know better than to assume degrees are always attainable by high IQ people. You probably had issues other than directly understanding the content.

File: ss-2017-09-09-03-34-25.png (47KB, 271x354px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 271x354px

>>62324253
http://sci-hub.io/10.1037/0003-066x.58.1.78
above .50 is above 90th percentile in benchmarks so these are strong as fuck

>>62324326
the trait industriousness is almost as important as intelligence when it comes to finishing a degree. high neuroticism might also fuck you up. nobody's claiming that intelligence alone would make you rich and successful. that's you overinterpreting stuff

>>62324358
Just keep picking the same thing over and over and you get that every time

>>62324382
The median correlation there is 0.7 which is visualized in this image.

Sure it's "strong" for a correlation in a social science. But it still means a different test has a nontrivial chance of giving you a results much higher or lower.

File: correlation of 0.7.png (30KB, 520x271px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 520x271px

>>62324629
Forgot image. Maybe I am retarded.

File: iqtest.png (18KB, 696x510px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 696x510px

>>62315965
if this test is accurate then why am I such a brainlet irl

>>62324629
>>62324647
looks pretty strong to me. not the kind of strong that you would rely on when sending people to the moon, but strong enough that if you get 135 in a couple of good tests then it's all but certain that you're rather gifted and predisposed towards solving novel problems

>>62315965
scored over 9000

File: picture_1504924879429.png (253KB, 1440x1260px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 1440x1260px

Is this like the max score or something? That was easy...

>>62325280
No, 145 is possible.
You're in the top 10% of this thread.

>>62318796
>to

>>62324701
might be that you are not as educated as you should be.

>>62320137
Only you're wrong because in the first column it's the left half of the image that flips, so your logic is flawed

File: Untitled.png (26KB, 734x591px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 734x591px

Some of these questions I had absolutely zero damn clue what I was supposed to see/do. Figured out most though.

What's the average score for the other boards?

>>62325947
yeah i would like to see some /pol/ numbers

>>62326022
It's going to be artificially inflated by selection bias just like the scores here.

Nobody with a low score is going to post, and the test isn't designed for anyone below 100 IQ anyways.

File: 1504317468368741.jpg (51KB, 800x762px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 800x762px

>>62324382
>high neuroticism might also fuck you up
how do i fix that?

>>62326022
Last time /pol/ was 3rd behind /sci/ and I can't remember the other.

>>62326043
doesn't matter I want to see it

File: Main170712.jpg (76KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 640x480px

>>62326069
>giving a fuck about /sci/
what science trenders don't realize is that /lit/ is the most intelligent board maybe followed by /diy/

>>62321446
this is too irrelevant, just give me a grid of 8 pictures and i'll give you 9th

>>62325947
If you go around to different boards and ask how big everybody's dick is, I'm pretty sure you'll quickly find out that the average size for all boards is somewhere around 8.5" with a massive girth. It'll be a combination of people fucking lying and people unashamedly commenting about their large members because of how awesome their huge fucking dicks are. Asking is not a good way of finding something like this out.

File: iq.jpg (33KB, 802x530px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 802x530px

Pleb I guess. I scored 8 points higher on a real test. That one had me memorize a bunch of words and numbers and repeat them after doing these gay ass patterns.

File: iq.png (36KB, 758x507px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 758x507px

I still don't understand the last one.

File: math_chad.jpg (65KB, 969x778px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 969x778px

I didn't have time to examine the last one.

They are all either rotation / reflection, or some sort of "addition" plus rotation / reflection.

File: 2017-09-09-125855_677x528_scrot.png (25KB, 677x528px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 677x528px

>>62326569
Its too easy

Anyone have a list of the right answers so I can also pretend to be a genius?

File: iq.png (14KB, 707x422px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 707x422px

I use GNU/Linux, by the way.

File: photo.png (7KB, 634x412px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 634x412px

Beat my score

>>62323040
Depends on what you like. I remember that they organized a lot of "cultural" trips to see nearby monuments (I live in Italy so we have a lot) and a FUCKING LOT of roleplaying table games nights.
The rest of the time they spent arguing, jerking to themselves, and talking about startups that never went anywhere on Facebook. Sure, you can make new friends, but the best networking will always be the Rotary Club (though also a bunch of self-entitled faggots that I left)

File: iq test sept 8 mensano.png (28KB, 501x399px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 501x399px

>>62321446
>tfw slightly too low to comment but will anyway

>ayys

Almost certainly real, but probably havent visited here. As to why aliens with spacefaring technology wouldn't visit us, its the economy stupid.

>pyramids

Probably build by the rulers we think built them. I find the internal ramp theory the most compelling explanation, but it needs more evidence.

>goolag

fuck them

>the universe

dunno what you want to know about it

>vaccines

Require them for public schools since herd immunity is real. Let private schools decide if they are required or not.

>illuminati

Real life is more like Burn After Reading then Eyes Wide Shut. Incompetence/petty personal fueds leads to most of the strange occurrences in politics and the like

>uncertainty principle and cs topic

what do you want to know about it?

As for anything else, if you want to get smart read books, if you want to get dumb read the news. Garbage in garbage out is very true, and most of mainstream media is a wasteland of pure unadulterated shit

>>62322663
They have that shitty screenshot protection like ProtonMail app does. I can't find where to disable it in settings though.
Do you know what Firefox Klar is, Anon?

>>62327578
>screenshot protection like ProtonMail app does

Wait it does? Why?

Daily reminder that you can easily score over 100 on this joke of an IQ test by clicking randomly. If you get less than 130, you are mentally retarded.

>>62327702
it doesn't let you screenshot. It just says "Cannot take a screenshot" in a pop-up.
I don't know how it relates to privacy but fuck it, I'm changing browsers.

>>62315965
Wtf? It timed out on me.
Maybe I shouldn't do these from my bed.>>62316010

I got 93 :C

>>62316347
>this is official norway's mensa website you brainlet.
>No https
They aren't so smart it seems.

File: Screen Shot 2017-09-09 at 3.34.35 AM.png (35KB, 669x510px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 669x510px

I hit the "end test" button around 90% completion cause fuck that shit.

File: test.mensa.no.png (39KB, 884x795px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 884x795px

I wonder if these tests are even a little bit accurate. They always give really high scores.

>>62328096
i think they do that cause people are more likely to pay for a real test in hopes of confirming.

>>62315965
135 on official offline mensa test.

>>62321446
>ayys,
Probably exists but not on earth
>pyramids,
Probably build by Egyptians
>goolag,
Google is corrupted by stupidity and hypocrisy, like most of our society. Sad but inevitable thing.
>or the universe?
It looks nice. I can't wait for theory of everything.
>Or vaccines?
They work, some might have some effects but it's worth it.
>Or Illuminati?
Various freemasonry exists. But they don't necessary control the world.
>The uncertainty principle?
I'm not a physicist. It doesn't have to be true but it's a model so if the math works then it works. Expecting everything in the universe to work in familiar way is pretty stupid though.
>CS topic?
Theory is interesting but I'm more of engineer than scientist. However I would love to build hard AI, but I only care about actually making it real instead making theories and expanding our scientific knowledge. It may be native but I never cared about doing science for sake of science.

Keep in mind intelligence ≠ wisdom.

File: 1482175702172.jpg (8KB, 266x208px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 266x208px

>>62315965
stopped at the middle of the test, because got bored. iq=103... Are other people really that retarded?

>>62326066
you stop giving a fuck about yourself, others, everything.


personally crippiling nhilism fixed it for me.

>>62328405
so you just replaced it with nihilism? how does that help the uselessness. I will still end up remaining unsuccessful.

File: test.png (36KB, 675x778px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 675x778px

I was able to find some reasonable pattern for all of them except the last one. What the fuck was that?

>>62323092
>you have to pay to join MENSA
dropped

I got 103 from hitting random answers. Dumb thread.

>>62328727
>what is probability
>what is knowing how you are graded
See >>62323858
It's probably not as simple as "correct answer is points, incorrect answer is no points". It's probably ranked on how close to the correct pattern you are, so by just clicking randomly you are just wasting your time, not proving any point.

Though I would be interested to see if you actually did better or worse if you took it seriously.

>>62326066
you go get medical help

>>62327726
daily reminder that people who keep repeating that are retarded and have no clue about how tests like these operate

>>62322505
>practicing IQ tests
I actually didnt practice it.. but I did the same one 2 times beforehand on /pol/.

First time I got around 130+ which is probably my real IQ, now I can get 145 eaisily in this test.

File: 2017-09-09 10_46_18-Mensa IQ Test.png (21KB, 1171x243px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 1171x243px

Rate my IQ guys

>>62331771
what kind of medical help?

>Your IQ was measured to 95, which is equivalent to the 36.9 percentile.
well frick

>>62315965
128
some of puzzle kinda repetitive

>>62333211
cool story now make me a sandwich

>>62333407
o-okay dad, just p-p-please d-don't beat m-me s-s-so hard th-this time...

File: IQ-test.png (45KB, 1084x773px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 1084x773px

>>62315965

>tfw not brainlet

>>62333429
>below 140
>not a brainlet
Pick one

File: brainlet.jpg (221KB, 1066x1000px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1066x1000px

>>62333483

not according to this chart

I'm a fucking retard, no way my IQ is 135. When I was 14 I had a professional test done and scored 115. Shit test.

File: Screenshot_20170909-114202.png (156KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1080x1920px

Guess I'm a brainlet

>>62316651
I smashed randomly every answer and got 100 IQ everytime.

>>62328447
flip the top one horizontally and apply it to the middle one, using the usual line addition rules
Does this cap at 140? Or did anyone manage to get more?

>>62316390
> hey bought a 4chan iOS app

bahhahahahha

135, im fine with whatever

>>62315965
110

>>62327932
Kek, mensa BTFO

>>62333528
children IQ tests are different than adult ones, obviously a teenage brain works different than an adult one

File: IMG_0363.png (116KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 750x1334px

tfw too intelligent for this

File: image.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

It was ez pez, all the questions were very similar >>62326569

File: Screenshot-20170909202149-832x615.png (32KB, 832x615px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 832x615px

Random

>>62334938
What point are you trying to make? At that percentile people will just randomly choose except for a couple

>>62334961
the amount of people that bring up the fact that the test doesn't give a reliable result when you do it wrong like they were on to something is really baffling

>>62321446
Many people here might score high numbers but not actually know anything.
t. 145IQ

>>62334938
Better than the average nigger

>>62321446
>conflating knowledge and intelligence

File: 1504832359449s.jpg (6KB, 250x200px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 250x200px

kek

>>62335428
I get your point, but on the other hand high iq implies higher ability to gain knowledge, so I guess it's somewhat correlated with knowledge in the end. far from 1:1 obviously

File: PYaJCmp[1].png (47KB, 867x615px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 867x615px

>tfw i've been bartending for 4 years and my IQ has only dropped by 2 points.

ALCOHOL DOESN'T KILL BRAIN CELLS

REPEAT AFTER ME

33 is the only question I couldn't solve. Anyone knows the solution and the logic behind it?

>>62337960
nvm solved it

Some people think it's bullshit that everyone here scores over 90%.

What they are not realising, is that most people are dumb as fucking dog shit. "Regular" people are unbelievably stupid, so being over 90% is not a big deal at all. If you are not at least over 95% then you are a brainlet, not two ways about it.

>>62327209
>Rotary Club (though also a bunch of self-entitled faggots that I left)

No offense senpai, but are you sure you are no the problem? You seem to not get along with any groups you get into

>>62323498
I don't know if this is bait but you are wrong, 100 is approximately the average iq, not the average score if you click randomly...

>>62320586
>20% who take are in the 90 percentile

>>62315965
Got 130 on that test some months ago
Official tested IQ was 127 a few years ago

File: Screenshot_2017-09-10-01-34-20.png (84KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 720x1280px

No way we're all geniuses. Mensa is putting everyone in the top bracket for marketing.

115

>>62338800
13 isn't in genius tier, lad.

>>62338800
You now realize how stupid the average IQ 100 person really is

>>62334851
>too smart to take screenshot

>>62338810
Eh, I wish I really were in the top 2% of people at the office. I'd settle for that.

And still, the amount of top 2%ers in this thread, knowing most of 4chan is full of underachievers, shows how stupid this is.

Reminder that IQ is always measured against a population.
In this case, the population of people who take online IQ tests.

>In this case, the population of people who take online IQ tests.
Why would you assume that they base the result only on the people who take the test instead of the whole population like they do for every other test?

So far /fit/ is winning the IQ competition

File: oh.png (13KB, 651x417px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 651x417px

>>62316592
wait, 118 is a brainlet? Is this why I graduated as a computer engineer with a 2.4 GPA?

File: 128.png (15KB, 654x407px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 654x407px

To be honest /g/ is not the board that I browse the most.

Not bad.

>>62339095
yes

>>62338983
To base the result on the general population, they'd have to administer the same test to a representative sample of the general population. It's much easier and cheaper to just score you among your peers.

>>62339129
thank god, it isn't my fault
it was just legitimately the best I was able to do with 12-hour study days
I was worried that I hadn't earned my way to my 6-figure salary but now I know I worked for it tooth and claw

>>62339131
>they'd have to administer the same test to a representative sample of the general population
That's what I assume they did. Otherwise that wouldn't be a legitimate IQ test.

File: Screenshot_20170910-010505.png (233KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 1080x1920px

>>62315965
Y'all got nothing on me
>TFW alien masterrace

120 after 4 beers
soundsa about right

>>62316390
>phone
so sub-80 eh?
tough break kiddo...

>>62339165
>get suckered into thinking you're a genius from the online test
>show up in person to take the real test, only to realize you're average
>mensa gets your money and more data points at the same time

ok I'm going insane, what is the answer to the 33rd question?

>>62320137
>>62325788

>>>62316010
Found the literal retard.

>Your IQ was measured to 123, which is equivalent to the 93.7 percentile.

At least I have a seven inch dick.

>>62323553
do you really mean it, twitter teenager shithead?

>70-80
not intelligent enough to use a smartphone without help
>80-100
not intelligent enough to use a real computer properly, prefers to only use popular social media smartphone apps
>95-115
"Mount Reddit"
>115-130
prefers anonymity, mainly uses 4chan/8ch
>130-145
prefers complete privacy and security, only uses anonymous darkweb message boards
>145+
prefers to only communicate with other initiated super geniuses in elite private groups

>>62339577
Only a <80 person could spew such bullshit

>>62339434
Ignore rows and columns. Circle, triangle and bucket are the base shapes.
First transformation is flipping both sides horizontally, all three of those exist in the matrix.
Second transformation is flipping the right side both horizontally and vertically. The bucket is missing. The answer is 3.

>>62315965
>falling for the IQ test meme
IQ is pseudoscience like the Briggs-Meyers test.

>>62339675
>rationalizing your bad pattern recognition abilities

>>62339675
>>62339714
>implying selecting squares and circles determines your level of intelligence, of which there are many and it has been proven that the IQ test is utter bollocks.

>>62339656
Only you just repeated what the other guy said without actually addressing my point about being wrong. With the circle, it is the left side that flips. You are wrong. Please try again.

>>62339765
>i am objectively bad at recognizing patters so i cope by believing that recognizing patterns is a useless ability

>>62339577
>180+
lives in a shed innawoods, communicates exclusively via postal service

File: file.png (20KB, 313x402px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 313x402px

>>62339791
>With the circle, it is the left side that flips
No it's not.

>>62339803
>implying that recognizing patterns in squares and circles determines your intelligence
How much of a sadsack do you have to be to actually believe this horseshit? You have to have an unscientific test validate your identity? There is a strong scientific consensus at this point that the IQ test doesn't even measure intelligence.

>objectively bad at recognizing patterns
It doesn't even matter if I received a high or a low score on the test, because there is nothing objective about the test at all. If homo sapiens survived this long, it wasn't because of circles and squares on a webpage. This kind of "pattern recognition" is fundamentally idiotic.

>>62325687
ThatTheJoke.jpg

>>62339895
There's also a strong scientific consensus that there's a strong correlation between IQ as measured with Raven's matrices and academic achievement.
Raven's matrices are about as objective as it gets. That's the entire point. They are an extremely distilled form of pattern recognition. I don't know whether or not it would help you kill a boar but whatever it tests, it does a good job at testing it.

110
You can laugh

>>62339975
You are way too naive for words.

>>62340121
Nice argument.

Does this cap at 143? I don't think I failed any.

I got 115 but I unironically think I'd have gotten a better result had time not run out.