Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
Search Engines General 2017-09-07 07:03:19 Post No. 62302846
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Search Engines General 2017-09-07 07:03:19 Post No. 62302846
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: search-engine-history.png (17KB, 398x200px) Image search:
[Google]
17KB, 398x200px
Hay I notice no one even talks about these, so what search engine has the least trash these days?
I mean ever I search anything at all anymore I just keep getting News Articles, News sites, paid for content, click bait, mindless political nonsense, and other irrelevant content.
I use the advanced search queries but you can only filter out like 16 or so words, and theirs more then that number of "News" sites alone.
And I've tired using Bing, Google, Duck, and it still doses this.
>>
https://www.qwant.com/
>>
>>62303314
It's still not that clean but it is cleaner by a fair bit.
>>
>>62303314
Came here to post this. I don't like the layout, but they're an alternative to Google and have way less bloat.
>>
>>62303387
True, but I still see thing like dailymail. Kinda wish there was one where I could remove websites from search results, kinda like what google used to let you do.
>>
>>62303443
You can
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/personal-blocklist/
>>
>>62302846
why don't you try https://wiby.me/
>>
DuckDuckGo all the way, or startpage if you need google results.
>>
>>62303935
This
DDG seems to filter out a lot of google sponsored adsense clickbait because they don't rely on google ads for profit.
Google is barely usable now
>>
ddg is really the only option but I barely spend any time on the big general search engines generally speaking I just have keywords set up that'll immediately use the site's search provided
>>
>>62303935
DDG I still get a stick ton of trash when ever I google with it.
Thread posts: 11
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1