Intel foundry customer bails out

Thread replies: 19
Thread images: 12

Anonymous
Intel foundry customer bails out 2017-09-07 05:18:08 Post No. 62301442
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: intel-d1x-fab-5-690x460_c.jpg (162KB, 690x460px) Image search: [Google]

Intel foundry customer bails out Anonymous 2017-09-07 05:18:08 Post No. 62301442 [Report]

It looks like one of Intel’s marquee foundry customers just jumped ship. SemiAccurate has been saying that Intel’s vaunted 10nm process is not commercially viable, now we are seeing the first fallout.

https://semiaccurate.com/2017/09/06/intel-foundry-customer-bails/

Anonymous 2017-09-07 05:26:43 Post No.62301548
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-09-07 05:26:43 Post No.62301548 [Report]

File: 1497527114918.png (109KB, 2250x2324px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 2250x2324px

FINISHED AND BANKRUPT

Anonymous 2017-09-07 05:36:56 Post No.62301646
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-09-07 05:36:56 Post No.62301646 [Report]

File: 1489100922662.png (246KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 882x758px

>>62301442
PLEASE DELET

Anonymous 2017-09-07 06:08:59 Post No.62302073
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-09-07 06:08:59 Post No.62302073 [Report]

File: 1502015743207.png (187KB, 568x612px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 568x612px

>>62301442
DELID NAO

Anonymous 2017-09-07 07:50:08 Post No.62303630
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-09-07 07:50:08 Post No.62303630 [Report]

File: 10nm by 2015.png (123KB, 547x261px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 547x261px

>>62301442
Threadly reminder.

Anonymous 2017-09-07 07:51:35 Post No.62303656
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-09-07 07:51:35 Post No.62303656 [Report]

File: 1498786843700.jpg (41KB, 540x532px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 540x532px

>>62303630
>in research

Anonymous 2017-09-07 07:51:37 Post No.62303657
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-09-07 07:51:37 Post No.62303657 [Report]

File: 1502044386396.jpg (54KB, 679x758px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 679x758px

no it cant be !!! whyyyyy !!! i just remortgaged my house to pay for my wifes sons mothers bull

Anonymous 2017-09-07 08:47:54 Post No.62304538
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-09-07 08:47:54 Post No.62304538 [Report]

File: 1494122327808.jpg (510KB, 1315x794px) Image search: [Google]

510KB, 1315x794px

Intel is done for. Good riddance to these pesky mossad shekelgrubbers!

Anonymous 2017-09-07 11:16:00 Post No.62306507
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-09-07 11:16:00 Post No.62306507 [Report]

>>62304538
DELETE

Anonymous 2017-09-07 11:28:44 Post No.62306669
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-09-07 11:28:44 Post No.62306669 [Report]

File: 1501245938609.png (84KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 653x726px

intel just need a bit more time and with ryzen not being more than a footnote theres nothing to worry about, no need to rush

Anonymous 2017-09-07 11:35:40 Post No.62306760
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-09-07 11:35:40 Post No.62306760 [Report]

Charlie is becoming more and more bitter but he isn't wrong.

Anonymous 2017-09-08 01:42:49 Post No.62308297
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-09-08 01:42:49 Post No.62308297 [Report]

File: Intel_foundry_roadmap-617x463.jpg (36KB, 617x463px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 617x463px

>>62303656
It doesn't mean it will be in research by 2015 but out by 2015

Anonymous 2017-09-08 01:56:52 Post No.62308436
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-09-08 01:56:52 Post No.62308436 [Report]

>>62308297
So they're a little behind but for good reason. AMD are not even close to a 10nm lithography. Why put out new tech when they can just wait for AMD and then beat them? But then again maybe in general it's becoming more and more difficult to create smaller dies. How small can you go, seriously? 1nm?

Anonymous 2017-09-08 02:00:48 Post No.62308483
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-09-08 02:00:48 Post No.62308483 [Report]

File: nm process details.png (31KB, 707x797px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 707x797px

>>62308436
They'll be on Global Foundries 7nm tech late next year with Zen 2.

Anonymous 2017-09-08 02:03:45 Post No.62308518
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-09-08 02:03:45 Post No.62308518 [Report]

>>62308483
Fucking hell, already? Where've I been? Links?

Anonymous 2017-09-08 02:05:36 Post No.62308537
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-09-08 02:05:36 Post No.62308537 [Report]

>>62308518
https://www.semiwiki.com/forum/content/6879-exclusive-globalfoundries-discloses-7nm-process-detail.html

Anonymous 2017-09-08 02:15:41 Post No.62308666
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-09-08 02:15:41 Post No.62308666 [Report]

>>62308436
kek, intel's 10nm is a fucking disaster, their yields are so low that they'll only release shitty laptop chips next year which don't even have any advantage over their 14nm ones

Anonymous 2017-09-08 03:10:32 Post No.62309270
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-09-08 03:10:32 Post No.62309270 [Report]

>>62308436
a three year delay is not little, and ontop of that a three year delay where the only launch products are low power laptop chips. Server and desktop lines cancelled, no 10nm for them until Icelake in 2019

Anonymous 2017-09-08 03:15:47 Post No.62309339
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-09-08 03:15:47 Post No.62309339 [Report]

File: 1499546430978.jpg (8KB, 269x211px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 269x211px

>>62303630
Delet this

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible. Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/