Will Firefox 57 finally allow us to use kdialog on KDE?

>>62288887
i hope they remove all kde support

File: 1484777606892.png (968KB, 1277x1281px) Image search: [Google]

968KB, 1277x1281px

>>62288909
Dumb GNOMElet

>>62288923
I don't use gnome, dumb DElet

>>62288923
>true white swedish
doesn't exist anymore

File: 1504060009882.png (191KB, 736x534px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 736x534px

>>62288909
A bit rude desu

>>62288923
Post the Konqi version

>>62288938
dumb WMlet

>>62288985
>implying you don't use a window manager

>>62288909
that's easy, there is none

>>62288994
>btw I use arch

File: 1475743959897.png (214KB, 1277x1281px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 1277x1281px

>>62288961

Mozilla will probably never upstream the patches. I used the patched Firefox on Plasma for a while but I went pack to vanilla. It isn't that big of a deal þbh

>>62288909
>I hope they remove literally zero lines of code
wew

File: 1501869796741.png (67KB, 641x530px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 641x530px

>>62288887
>RESOLVED WONTFIX
rude

File: 1504344326227.png (160KB, 490x480px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 490x480px

>>62289060
It's really useful when you have to find the right smug anime girl desu.

>>62289126
>WONTFIX
>opensuse fixed it years ago
Why can't they just upstream that shit?

>>62289151
Mozilla, like GNOME, hates any upstream patches that will overall improve their software

File: 1504384023018.png (787KB, 845x646px) Image search: [Google]

787KB, 845x646px

>>62289164
>13 (thirteen) years have passed
i think gnome devs are a bit slow

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141154&

>>62288887
What would you use it for? You can shitpost from your phone via Clover anyway.

>>62289291
>phoneposters pretending to have a dumb opinion
the final nail in the coffin

File: neg.png (67KB, 641x530px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 641x530px

>>62289229
>Reported: 2004-04-26 16:10 UTC
>Status: NEW
rude

GTK was a mistake

>>62289164
>adding kbloat
>improvement

File: b_1_q_0_p_0.jpg (17KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 640x480px

>>62289013
KAN I FUKS KATIE TOO???!!??

>>62288887
>I will actually fucking switch from firefox if they don't fix this bullshit with the default file browser it uses

Why the fuck are these people so stupid that they think this isn't an issue?

>>62289060
Icecat on KDE running on fedora lets me use kdialog.
And of course, qutebrowser also supports it, really shaping up to be best browser.

>>62289524
>make the browser use kdialog if KDE is installed
>muh bloat

>>62289587
How do I get icecat installed?

Is there a guide so it gets installed properly? Looks like there isn't an updated repository for it.

>>62289524
>don't ship a file picker but use the OS filepicker
>adding bloat
pick one

>>62289660
>This is the actual state of linux when installing outside repos: You need a fucking guide just to get it working properly

How is linux so fucking BAD at installing shit without the package manager?

>>62289587
>Icecat on KDE running on fedora lets me use kdialog.
Why do you tell lies?

>>62289660
What distro are you on? Fedora?
There's a copr repo
For Arch there's an AUR build, and I'm pretty sure debian/ubongo have a ppa
I highly suggest trying out qutebrowser too, especially if you're in touch with your inner vi

>>62289705
I think the copr build has it compiled in.
I could be wrong, its been a few months since I've used fedora

>>62289730
which copr, exactly?
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fulltext/?fulltext=icecat

>>62289716
I'm on mint, so anything ubuntu/debian should work

File: it keeps happening.png (78KB, 768x768px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 768x768px

it's time to swallow the chromium pill

>>62290158
botnet

>>62289743
I'm 100% sure he mistook arora or something like that for icecat

>>62290261
you can have the botnet without the botnet
https://github.com/Eloston/ungoogled-chromium

>>62290158
>tfw I started using Chrome in 2008
>tfw I'm a browser hipster

>>62290286
>implying you can remove the botnet

>>62288887
I just want it to work with the KDE global menu

>>62290304
a debotnet'd chromium will probably be way less of a botnet than a non-debotnet'd furryfox

>>62290334
>implying sjwfox has botnet other than amo

>>62290382
furryfox is filled with botnets. Have fun hardening with https://github.com/ghacksuserjs/ghacks-user.js/blob/master/user.js and breaking literally everything.

>>62290334
but a debotneted Firefox would be way less of a botnet than a "(((debotneted))) chromium
(gnu icecat)

>>62288887
Why wont they fix this? It's not 2005 anymore and gtk/gnome are not the face of linux. GTK3/Gnome3 made sure of that

File: 1477344951072.gif (2MB, 286x210px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 286x210px

>>62290411
>install meme GNU Icecat
>tick "Block execution of non-free JavaScript"
>tick "Block privacy trackers"
>go to about:config
>type "google"
>mfw

>>62290457
It requires a modicum of effort (upstreaming the fix from opensuse). Mozilla doesn't have developers or programmers anymore, they have social justice activists. Doing actual work as anathema to what Mozzila as a company does now.

>>62288923
>fucks chads in the ass
Oh God i keked hard at this. All hail KDE

File: 1481746843394.png (48KB, 400x389px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 400x389px

>mozilla was working on a qt port until 2012
>opensuse has patches to use the kde file picker

>>62290634
>chromium does it the right way and detects if you have kdialog

>>62288961
Get raped and kill yourself, you retarded fucking faggot sack of nigger shit with down syndrome.