Even PJW moved to BitChute. Why isn't /g/ helping Bitch

>>62273936
It's a meme
And I don't give a shit about PJW

>>62273936
>buttchute
seems appropriate

oh and fuck off with your shilling

>>62273936
>PJW
so why am I supposed to care about a 90 IQ britbong?

>pajeet justice warrior
designated

>>62273958
Thank's Google!
I'm sure they will make tons of money on a fucking open source peer to peer network.

We don't know the full security pitfalls of WebRTC is. It's server side javascript. What could go wrong.

>>62273936
MAYNESTREEM

Who the fuck picked "Bit Chute"? The url has "bitch" in the title, normie dumbfucks are going to call it "Bitch Oot." Even if you say it the way it's meant to be pronounced it sounds retarded. Had to have been an ESL speaker that thought it up.

>>62274001
Do you know them security risks of running google scripts on 4chan and youtube?

>>62274025
It's pronounced "gif".

>>62274040
of course but i'm not using bitorrent technology to download udp/ip packages on 4chan. This is uncommon and new and I'm waiting for the security uproar and consequential patches.

>>62274025
They'll probably change it in the future to add a dash or something, like expert sex change did.

>>62273936
It looks nice, needs some UI enhancements.
PJW is a reddit-tier trash though

>>62273936
I'm /pol/-browser and I can tell you that saying PJW uses ________ makes me want to us _______ less. Also,
>MAYNESTREEM METEOR

>>62273936
I only have 2 vids on my shit channel but I will be messaging bitchute to try and get access.

>>62273936
Bitchute isn't true freedom of speech/expression.

It's a pol safe space , it reeks of freedom of speech, but only when it appeals to me. I encourage you to read the tos, it is owned and operated by a puritan pol user. YouTube of old actually used to allow more than their tos. Good concept for overhead, future profitability, possibility to get reasonable payment for ad traffic for creators. But it's in the wrong hands currently in terms of branding, marketing and purity of beliefs/principles.

>>62274569
>YouTube of old actually used to allow more than their tos.
Yeah well I am alive today not yesterday, call me when something even more free arises.

>>62273936
>PJW
lmao, who gives a shit what some shut-in britbong living in his mom's attic fucking thinks or uses? Dumbass.

>>62274603
Okay and I will, doesn't mean I'll champion some bullshit I don't believe in. You're free to, but to me this looks like a placeholder.

>>62274640
Sure, but better we move there for now, and create a competitive market, at least to some degree; but always be on the look out for greener pastures.

>>62273936

Is there a way to select Video quality ?

>>62274688
I believe currently HD isn't supported

>BitChute

moar liek shitchute

>>62274691

only 480p possible ?

>>62274025
>The url has "bitch" in the title, normie dumbfucks are going to call it "Bitch Oot."
I dont think they care, seeing that 90% of content is nazi bullshit

>>62273936
>Utilizing video on the internet.
LOL

>>62273936
i am not from pol what is pjw

>"Bitch Oot"

kek

>>62274899
Penile Justice Warrior

They use their penises to rape bitches for great justice.

is there a way to disable disqus bullshit?

How long until they give in like gab did?

>>62274937
>Bitch Oot
>Bitch Ooga
>Bitch Ooga Booga

>>62274997
>Penile Justice Warrior
Conservatives are rapists. #NotFakeNews #HillaryIsSexy #HillaryIsMyLove

>>62275590
>liberal [[[humor]]]

>>62275615
Be sure to subscribe to Vox and frequent Reddit to remain a bit geeky for the sake of trends!

>>62275615
>Falling for it...

Can someone tell me how realistic a new video site topples YouTube. I don't think it will be this or vidme or anything currently existing. Why aren't we considering making it a utility and or anti trust laws?

i thought itd be an affordable site where you can buy those cool paraglider things

>>62275726
not likely especially considering youtube is probably gonna take over the video streaming market from twitch

File: Screenshot from 2017-09-06 10-45-18.png (411KB, 857x484px) Image search: [Google]

411KB, 857x484px

>COME TO BITCHUTE TO GET YOUR NEWS ON THE MAINSTREAM METEOR, BITCHUTE IS THE NEW COWNTER COALCHURE

>>62273936
>IMAGINE MY SHOCK WHEN PEOPLE THINK I AM A FASCIST AFTER I REFUSE TO ATTACK FASCISM AND INSTEAD FOCUS ENTIRELY UPON THE SUPPOSED "THREAT" THAT "THE LEFT" POSES TO "WESTERN CIVILIZATION" (ALSO I AM A LITERAL FAGGOT)

>>62274569
Does their TOS allow them to take down videos for hate speech or promoting violence? Or for any political content they disagree with? I don't see that anywhere.

File: 1480262914932.png (1MB, 1458x892px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1458x892px

>>62276197
>BONG BONG COME TO BITCH-UTE GOYIM

File: C4xGINoWIAAqZzn.jpg large.jpg (85KB, 900x948px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 900x948px

>BITCH-UTE IS THE NEW COUNTER CULTURE

>>62274691
And into the trash can it all goes...

>>62276890
>https://www.bitchute.com/policy/guidelines/

>Showing respect and decency towards fellow members of the community and others is required.
This can mean, no rude jokes, no insulting your audience.

>promoting or glorifying violence will not be tolerated.
This could mean no promoting fighting, no guns, certain video games might not be allowed.

>promoting pornography will not be tolerated.
This is one that gets me, I can't mock porn, I can't make a porn list, I can't have porn friends or discuss a common taboo subject.

You have to read the tos and understand how they might be translated. These guys scream puritan /pol/ user christfags who want to subject us to their morality. Minds has the best tos, but I think it's trying to be too much, instead of just a video hosting site. My view of decent and freedom of speech/expression is if a certain offensive critically acclaimed show could be made on the platform. ie south park, blazing saddles, your standard R rated movie.

File: 1458808620409.png (409KB, 493x572px) Image search: [Google]

409KB, 493x572px

>>62277243
>My view of decent and freedom of speech/expression is if my manchild meme cartoons and movies can go uncriticized.

>>62277425
That's not an argument, those were merely baseline examples of existing works that couldn't exist given those guidelines. Not if they were good or bad.

If you aren't able to recreate already popular and established works. Then first you don't want others to push the boundaries and secondly you deem certain creations not worthy for recreation. Therefore not freedom of speech and is already tarnished with censorship.

>>62277486
>Then first you don't want others to push the boundaries
It's full of nazi shit and moonman songs. How is that not pushing the boundaries?

>>62274569
Came to post this.
There is nothing called free speech, flood this shite site with communist videos and see how it is taken down, eventually.
/pol/ tards are crybaby looking for muh safe place exactly like SJW, both are shit.

why is every alternative to youtube have to be an extreme political rebound? can't someone just make a comfy tech/anime/otaku video hosting site?

>>62277519
It's not if there is or isn't works that fall outside of the guidelines. It's if there is contradictory guidelines which could mean the censorship was warranted. You don't get to play the free speech and the muh morality card at the same time. It's either you believe in censorship or you are a freedom of speech/expression absolutist [inb4 someone mentions the extreme illegal outskirts of freedom of speech/expression everywhere agrees shouldn't have a home].

>>62277545
No idea, wish someone who just wants to make money and then allow creators to do whatever the fuck they want would step in. But who knows if or when that will happen. Bitchute was good even if it doesn't take off, it presents a sustainable blueprint which won't have an insane overhead and potential profitability foreseen. We don't know if youtube will ever be profitable with how it's designed being the ever growing video hosting cloud of the world, continuing to balloon and balloon making it harder to envision a profit will come.

>>62277621
Fuck off Pajeet, you're late for English class.

>>62277725
Probably some mistakes, I'll agree my written english isn't the best. Fucked around and didn't care enough in those classes.

>>62273936
Does anyone know if they were inspired by poopshoot?

>>62277545
Otakus arent supresses by Youtube's administration, you dont gave to to anywhere

File: styx.jpg (46KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 600x400px

>>62273936
thanks a lot; I clicked that link; hit play on a video; and was presented with the partially obscured face of sticks heck and hammer, hair hanging so coyly; thanks a bunch OP

>>62273936
What is this even?

Is it one of those safe spaces for neo-Nazis?

>>62278497
Yes and no, it is believed to be so, but they haven't shown their hand yet.

>YOUTUBE WON'T LET US SAY NIGGER ANYMORE
>REEEEE

>>62274899
Paul Joseph Watson. Editor at INFOWARS DOT COM. The /pol/kids with pepe avatar on twitter and youtube love him.

>>62273936
the main reason youtube alternatives aren't working is adsense. how does bitchute users monetize their content?

>>62280692
Fake news. PJW is a kike.

>>62273936
I did

>>62280742
there should be some kind of bitcoin adsense

>>62273936
How do they make money? Ads?
I wish them luck, we really need some competition for Youtube. But I don't want to waste time if it has no future.

>>62280907
this is what i thought. perhaps some decentralized ad stock might work using something like ethereum contracts to verify display of ads in videos.

>>62281006
Have you tried sending money to people making good content?

>page won't load with JS off

No thanks

>>62276937
>>62276951
Quality posts right here

https://www.bitchute.com/video/habAJjF4hiYF/
doing my part

https://www.bitchute.com/channel/tealc/
Subscribe im uploading stargate sg-1 xavier renegade angel and lots of dani movies. Subscribe /g/

>>62286750
Dank*

>>62286750
One of the worst shows to come out of adult swim, kys pleb.

Also doesn't this invite lawyers to start issuing dmca and now bitchute to have potentially a more dedicated staff to this?

>>62286750
Does/can BitChute respond to DMCA requests?

Also, if they're technically unable to respond to DMCAs, how do they prevent the uploading of porn?

>>62287330
I think you are too stupid to like it.

>>62287667
I assume they don't care about DMCA's and porn can simply be manually deleted.

The site is in such a format anyone can mirror their video index and start their own site that allows whatever they want.

I imagine at some point their will be a porn version of bitchute and someone will have porn and regular videos on the same site.

>>62288060
Where are they located, that they don't care about DMCA or local equivalents?

>>62288089
Dunno, but even if they are in the US then hopefully the service is cloned, and it become to fragmented to destroy.

>>62288115
The webtorrent thing is pretty slick, but we need a decentralized index too.

>>62273936
Needs playlists.

>>62288393
hopefully one will be made.

>>62288611
Needs a ton of things, they are in beta and need to reference a lot of the features youtube has and replicate them.

>>62289961
The faq says that they used to have an upcoming features list but got so many suggestion emails they changed it to just be "we are working on copying youtube."

because /g/ is the biggest stronghold of google fanboys.
surprised you didnt know that OP

foss/privacy/security advocates are a very small minority of /g/

>>62278211
What's that on his face?

>>62273936
How does this intend to make money

File: FB_IMG_1489635302374.jpg (26KB, 413x563px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 413x563px

>>62273936
>bitchute
>bitch oot
>bitch shoot

/bitchute/ general when?

>>62297211
Don't get too excited and do your homework on bitchute it looks like a placeholder at best.

https://github.com/Chocobozzz/PeerTube

peertube looks neato
but like....
>webpack