Vim is great

>>62265367
i agree with you, but i prefer emacs

>(https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vimlogo.svg).
No file by this name exists.
I agree vim is awesome
You know what else is awesome?
copyq clipboard manager is awesome.

whoever makes these threads probably has only 2 days under their belt of trying vim and now they're so happy they're about to take a journey into vim-exclusivity text editing only to switch back to sublime text because they are mouse fags that can't muscle memory

>>62267400
:set mouse=a

Is this the thing where I have to press x to backspace and turns something as simple as a text editor into an annoying experience?

I wanted to select a good terminal emulator a few months back, was between vim and emacs.
Because I was learning touch typing at the same time, I had the (false?) impression that you need the two index fingers at h and j, contradicting the standard finger position at touch typing.
So I went emacs.

>>62265367
>This work is free software
disgusting commie detected

>>62265367
actually it is vi that is great. vim as a software project is an embarrassing clusterfuck, its UI is the only good thing about it, and that came almost entirely from vi.

>>62268361
also this.

File: 1415590649457.gif (1MB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 400x225px

>>62267673
>implying vim is a "text editor"

>>62268450
"Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to make creating and changing any kind of text very efficient."

From the site itself.