So this is the future of Ubuntu.

>>62259536
Why not just apt-get chromium-browser

File: cmon pepe.png (173KB, 373x373px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 373x373px

>actually using linux

>>62259536
lmao

>>62259554
It's only a matter of time before everything is a Snap package.

>>62259536
UBUNTU BOTNET CONFIRMED

>>62259581
completely untrue

>>62259536
are you fucking kidding me

File: a6bd5172452730877a6adc84c0b6dcaf.jpg (37KB, 400x386px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 400x386px

>>62259536

>using Ubuntu instead of Debian
You deserve the concequences of your actions

>>62259536
>Ubuntu
Manjaro is the new hotness

>>62259536
don't need that if you do it via terminal
at least on 16.04

>>62259536
why would you download things like that rather than through terminal

File: poortardedOP.png (216KB, 400x353px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 400x353px

>>62259536

>>62259536
>Snap store
top kek just give up

flatpak won

>>62259536
Yea, I know. Gnome is disgusting.

>>62259581
I really don't understand why Snap and Flatpak are needed or useful. Other than by project upstreams who want to do an end run around distro maintainers, which is something I actively don't want.

>>62259903
I think you kid but it's true. Manjaro literally is the sweet spot.

>>62259536
>using obongo
install gentoo

>>62259536
This is why I use a slackware-base with a deb package manager.

>>62259935
flatwho?
they should make them compat. so we all win. containerized apps would be great 2bh
not having to deal with firejail and right configurations and all that.

>>62259935
>Flatpak is designed to run inside a desktop session and relies on certain session services, such as a dbus session bus and a systemd --user instance. This makes Flatpak not a good match for a server.
more useless gnomepajeetredhatware for that 2% desktop market

>>62259948
Yeah, but the name stinks of curry. Name Ubuntu was obviously picked to cater to sjw nigger-lovers...

>>62259581
That's a load of shit and you know it

>>62259536
Why the fuck wouldn't you just use the commandline? Easier to automate. I have used the same script since 8.04 with occasional tweaks across reinstalls and it's still worked fine in 16.04.

>>62259948
>Manjaro
hows the hardware support? I have a laptop lenvo t450 that I run ubuntu on. Not a fan of this email requiemrnt, was looking to jump to something more stallman worthy.

Ubuntu did remove the privacy issues in 16, but the lenses are still there.

you can just apt-get through that shit, it's definitely a bad sign for the future though. how fucking annoying

>>62261020
I have a $400 Dell i3 I bought 7 months ago from Walmart. I've never had a hardware issue iwth Manjaro. The only issues I've ever had I think were caused by dual-booting so I erased Windows 10 and am solely running Manjaro. No problems so far.

snaps are designed to be decentralyzed

they can be hosted on 3rd party repos or locally

the official repo can be accessed via snapd without the gui login

>inb4 muh flatpaks
they arent GPLv3

snapcraft has more info on building or hosting your own

File: smug bill gates.jpg (62KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 800x533px

>>62261062
>No problems so far
if by 'problems' you mean 'games' then yea

>>62259536
Can i sign in with my amazon account

>>62261099
apt-get snapd
apt-get snap packagename

no sign in required

>>62261069
>>inb4 muh flatpaks
>the aren't contributors license agreement
ftfy

>>62261115
i heard apt gets viruses

File: 1504280418064.jpg (129KB, 482x347px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 482x347px

>>62259948
Manjaro is nice.
Antergos is also very nice.

Linuxfaggots must die

File: 354deaa3770912621bb816da070346ab--the-frog-united-states.jpg (12KB, 258x245px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 258x245px

hahahaha nigga how can snapstore logins be real hahaha install arch nigga, pacman -S chromium nigga hahahahahaha YAOURT CHROMIUM

>>62261020
>>62259948
Don't fall for this charlatans lies my noobuntu friends, Manjaro is a meme distro known for it's security holes, weird design choices and out of date packages, the REAL no nonsense preconfigured Arch install is ANTERGOS.

File: FB_IMG_14235485605011006.jpg (543KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

543KB, 768x1024px

>>62261092

Shouldn't you be back in school right now?

File: Screenshot from 2017-09-05 13-16-46.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>62261180
My man.

>>62261143
use apt https

>>62261121
>using LGPL

>>62261180
The REAL no nonsense arch is arch anywhere

>>62261515
>no nonsense arch
debian

>>62261550
>being this retarded

>>62259554
more like

apt install chromium

have you used it at all?

File: 1390261602762.png (4KB, 184x211px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 184x211px

>>62259903
until the SSL certificate runs out again

>>62261151
>Manjaro is nice.
"I'm too stupid to install Arch"
>Antergos is also very nice.
"I'm too stupid to install Arch"

>>62259536
Mint doesn't have this.

>>62261746
I have run an arch install multiple times and for years, bur when it comes to installing on new machines it's a fucking pain in the ass to repeat the process over and over, I'd rather get Antergos minimal and be up and running in 10 minutes.

>>62261771
Mint doesn't have anything because the devs are incompetent.

>>62261810
I'll take them over ubuntu, which can't seem to figure out what the fuck they want to be, and are relying on gnome, who thinks basic fucking shit shouldn't come out of the box, and instead should be bolted on.

The Apple Macbook Pro with Retina Display doesn't have this problem.

>>62261833
How about neither and using a real distro? If you love your .debs so much go to debian.

>>62261846
Why? So I can install everything that Mint has, and make it just like Mint?

>>62261868
Stability for a start, the mint devs are so incompetent that when they package shit in the upstream they can't even add -mint to it, they literally use the same names as the ubuntu stream so you can't get those packages if you want them.

L O O K
O
O
K

Look at all the faggot Stockholm Syndrome Ubuntu users and literal Ubuntu shills in this thread.

Just look at them. They're almost as cucked as Windows users. The fact that this is a thing at all is unacceptable.

The absolute state of Ubuntu.

>>62261922
When that becomes an issue for me, I may look into it. Thus far (the past 3 years), it hasn't been.

>>62259910

Yes, can confirm, but still really annoying for normies who can't into CLI (aka the Ubuntu target audience). Also the app store or what they call it is fucking broken. Ubuntu 16.04 is a piece of shit.

>>62261938
>pacman -Syu love
>target not found

>>62261600
>not using

please() {
    if [[ "$1" == "install" ]]; then
        if [[ "$3" == "for" ]]; then
            if [[ "$4" == "me" ]]; then
                if [[ "$5" == "daddy" ]]; then
                    apt install "$2"
                fi
            fi
        fi
    fi
}

>not having a terminal waifu

What a fucking loser

using fucking linux get fucked piece of shit nigger nerd

>>62259581
no on my machine thanks

File: Screenshot from 2017-09-05 03-07-54.png (991KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

991KB, 1920x1080px

mfw

>>62259947
this
>>62260254
3.37% on desktop and liderating the rest of the market, u faggot

>sudo snap install [package name]
No sign in needed

>>62259536
It looks like gnome is going to cuck us all pretty hard with their GTk3 cancer. AIDS window borders and no more status icons. Because there's no way the Linux community will stop piggybacking on their development.

>>62259947
Its for projects like krita, eg those that got memed into heavy qt+kde usage, so that installing newer versions from ppa would require upgrading half of the system.
Or like anything that really profits from updates (because features), since patching such clusterfucks would make maintainers pull their hair out. Its a "better" alternative to ppa's and unofficial repos, because of the option to include dependencies.

>>62261062
>>62261180
>>62261223
Does arch still use init? I heard weird things about systemd- bloated, might have hidden code, and some philosophical argument that I don't quit get.

>>62261143
wait, wut? is that a thing? Its all about the reposits no?

>>62262409
looks like windows xp.

>>62264853
If you don't even know why you should hate it, then you're not the kind of person who has any reason to hate systemd, it won't affect you at all.

>>62262420
>liderating the rest of the market
Yeah, until Fuchsia matures, and gets rid of your bloated meme kernel.

>>62259581
Good. Then we dont have to worry about regressions and dependency issues and related system breakages. Everything will be contained in its little sandbox instead of shitting up the OS.

We already know how apt loves to leave unused dependencies around after uninstalling shit.

>>62264862
enlighten me. As I understand it: init was compartmentalized while the systemd does the opposite. Am I off here?

Ubotnetu and its clones shouldn't be recommended to babbies.

>>62265184
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Comparison_of_init_systems

File: Retard.jpg (21KB, 211x244px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 211x244px

>chromuim

>>62261746
>Arch is nice
"I'm a dumb ricefag and can't install Gentoo"

>>62259536
sure feels comfy as fuck to be running fedora 26 right now

>>62259562
>linux only for servers hurrdurrr
is this summer fag meme ever going away?

File: 1301463593931.png (127KB, 445x445px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 445x445px

>>62261092
>muh gaymes
>>>/v/

gnome software center is useless. download the snap and install it with terminal

File: 1504386864732.jpg (57KB, 480x451px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 480x451px

>>62259536
daamn, why Canonical wants to be botnet so much? It looks like we will have an Amazon spyware experience yet again.
Why they just don't take something like FreeBSD and make it the botnet that they like. Thank God that all Canonical bullshit stays within the distro.

>>62259581
Using a kde application as a appimage on a gnome desktop or a gnome flatpak on kde. To avoid needing to install all the dependencies.

File: file.png (165KB, 1067x631px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 1067x631px

>not using an actual package manager

Windowsfag dropping his video games hobby to learn programming.

Is Ubuntu good for me or is it still botnet?

>>62259581
THIS. SNAP = NEW HIP "APP" STORE

>>62261600
it's chromium-browser on ubuntu

>>62271461
It's fine. I'd go with Xubuntu since Unity is kill. You'll have to fix screen tearing though.

>>62271461

You don't need to switch systems to learn programming, you know.

>>62259878
>using Debian instead of Mint
i hope you don't do this

>>62263320
This.
Idk how this thread devolved so much but it was stated multiple times.

Snaps are designed to be hosted 3rd party.
https://build.snapcraft.io/

Docs here to host your own repos on github or on a server.

Snaps and snapd are both GPLv3

>>62264933
>fuschia using magenta the bsd kernel fork

until google closes it off and cuks everyone who provided free development

then we will be sitting pretty with out GPL kernel ;)

So whats a snap package?

>>62259536
It's what you get for using a kernel developed by nsa

>>62272254
A pre-installed app containing all dependencies, similar to how you can unarchive firefox on linux and run it without installation. Basically what appimage does. You download it, double click it, and it opens and runs fine.
It's pretty much how windows handles installations, which is good since you won't have to manage dependencies (as they'll all be included) but bad since it will waste more space.

>>62272364
Thanks for that. Seems like it might be useful in some cases, but I'll just keep installing from the terminal

>>62272364

even Linus admits that dynamic linking was a mistake

>>62269184
This and the ability to easily install programs on a non-internet connected machine. I tried ubuntu back at 8.10 but I had no internet at the time. Instead I went to WinXP where I could take a flash drive to a friend's house, load up on programs and install when I got back home. I know , I know, EVERYONE has internet these days. Even with a smartphone, you could download a windows program and transfer it to a PC. Linux, not so easily, until now.

>>62260367
Do /pol/tards know where the Kilimanjaro is?

File: pol poster.png (49KB, 346x253px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 346x253px

>>62272609
>Do /pol/tards know
No

>>62272387
Will probably be comfy on bleeding edge distros if you want certain "slow" software, or on LTS distros if you want certain bleeding edge software. It will definitely make things easier for devs too, as they should now be able to push to any Linux distribution no matter what they're based on or how old/new they are.

>>62273043
wtf I love niggers, refugees and feminism now

File: anti pol posters.jpg (422KB, 1406x1299px) Image search: [Google]

422KB, 1406x1299px

>>62272609
>>62273043

Nothing at all wrong with Manjaro for someone new to Linux. It's miles better than -buntu crap.

>>62273092
This explains a lot.

>>62273105
because you said so?
Ubuntu is an industry standard (like RHEL) and Manjaro is just a slower riced spin of Arch.

>>62273092
>look I stalked someone doesn't that make me so cool fellow /pol/posters

>>62259536
>installs adware
>complains about it on the internet

Also,
Now i see why those faggots say that debian is missing features and has old packages. It hasn't updated its repos with adwares

>>62273215
>debian
Is that the distro so bad the creator killed himself?

>>62273212
>>>/r/4chan

>>62273209
Software store sucks, apt sucks, Canonical sucks, ppas suck, and saying that Ubuntu is the most popular platform for Linux fans is like saying the Toyota Camry is most popular car for automobile enthusiasts. Buntu spins are made for reatrds the same as Windows, it's designbed for the lowest common denominator. And in designing things for tards, it looses much of what is Linux. Fucking xubuntu is a buggy pos also.

>>62273278
I can agree that the store sucks. It's a buggy unstable mess. I have no idea how they could've fucked up so hard.

File: Ubuntupple.png (10KB, 184x220px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 184x220px

>>62273301
>looses
oops, anyway Ubuntu was never about true "open source" and "freedom." It's Corporate OS-Ubuntu/Canonical has gained much weight, if they really cared about user freedom they would use that to work towards a more open and sustainable solution (would this mean disposable computers too ?), instead it looks as if they are trying out the user lock-in technique in an attempt to rival Windows using Microsoft's methods mixed with some Apple juice. MIR should have taught us Cannonical wants complete and total control of the users and the tools they use. It's funny because Ubuntu highly relies completely on a 100% community driven project (Debian), it's been stable enough to base their whole distribution on it. It's funny because Ubuntu runs almost entirely using software from non-Ubuntu projects, many of which are corporate-less. And to top that off the CEO has worked in the past for a very very black ops company. Anything Canonical is tainted.

>>62273373
black ops company?

>>62273275
meant for >>62273092

>>62273516
GD C4 Systems

>>62259536
Your resolution is a disgrace, man!

>>62264989
> We already know how apt loves to leave unused dependencies around after uninstalling shit.

can't you just autoremove or autoclean?

>>62259562
dumb frogposter

>>62265902
> I'm a silly plebeian who cannot compile Linux and install it from scratch

>>62260254
> running chromium on a server

>>62264862
systemd is evil.

>>62273373
they have to utilize lock-in to stay afloat, but they seem to be backing off that method by dropping Unity and Ubuntu phone, regrettably I'd say, Ubuntu phone would have been great imo.

Either way you can use Flatpak if you don't like snaps.

File: gnm.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>62261223
pic related is what gnome 4 will look like

File: 1473039937912.jpg (13KB, 284x178px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 284x178px

>>62273325
>ebul nadsi boogeimen :((((

>>62274197
Do you pass-thru?

>>62274368
Mods are woke af

File: gnome_anal.png (70KB, 916x375px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 916x375px

>>62274197
>gnome 4
How is it any different from gnome 3?

>>62271708
screen tearing?
jesus christ.
how do they fuck up that bad

>>62260367
wew