u should be able to solve this uwu
>>62245200
Why is Illya so perfect /g/?
>>62245200
0% - I have no luck at all
>>62245200
https://puzzling.stackexchange.com/questions/6653/if-you-choose-an-answer-to-this-question-at-random-what-is-the-chance-you-will
0%, I don't limit my answers to the provided answers, since it's not stated you must, thus there are infinite answers, thus a 0% chance.
>>62245200
50%
>>62245200
bout tree fiddy
>>62245200
You should hang yourself, pedo.
>>62245344
don't bully her
>>62245200
It might not be an either or question, it might have more than 4 possibilities.
You have no chance
Why is 25% listed twice?
>>62245355
why not
>>62245355
>Why is 25% listed twice?
Because anime cause brain cancer.
>>62245200
I unironically want you to kill yourself
>>62245414
please read >>62245352
The posing of the question breaks probability, so none of the answers could be valid, because each answer attempts to work in a system that cannot be used for the problem. The nature of mathematics is a bit stranger than most people let on, and it's not perfect, in the sense that if one of the axioms are broken, the math that comes from it cannot be used.
The problem with this question in particular is that the answer you choose recursively changes what the answer to the problem is. It forces an answer to be in a state of being either true and false or neither true nor false. Problems that are directly tied to their answers use circular logic, and therefore cannot be used to get a true-or-false answer when an answer is chosen. At its heart, the question doesn't work because of a misuse of definitions of words like "chance." To understand the absurdity of asking this question, it would be like asking the following:
How many answers to this question are correct, if the number of correct answers is greater than the corresponding answer's number?
>1: 2
>2: 0
>3: 1
>4: 1
These are both meaningless questions that, by setup, can't be answered logically, simply because they do not meet the rules of logic. It's like asking what the best move reply is to an illegal move in chess. None of the moves are the best move, because the rules of the game are not being followed.
>>62245200
>uses my modification to c
Nice
Oh look, this thread again. Good thing I solved it years ago. I bet /g/ is still just as retarded though.
>>62245200
There is no correct answer.
This isn't rocket science, it's perfectly possible for a question to not have a correct answer.
For example,
Is OP a faggot?
A. No
B. No
C. No
D. No
This is NOT the same as c. 0% That is one of the answers, but none of the answers are correct.
>>62245266
wtf is this guy a genius
>>62245596
how do you know it's a guy?
>>62245578
A. 25%
B. 50%
C. None of the answers are correct
D. 25%
>>62245200
50% chance because half of the answers are correct.
>>62245709
50% is only up there once though.
>>62245602
he didn't write owo in his post so obviously owo
>>62245218
Illya is a homunculus, she is supposed to be perfect
>>62245709
Oh shit nvm, 75% chance right?
>>62245200
The answer is "Illya is my cute and lovely daughter"
Proof:
1. A is correct -> the probability of picking a correct answer is 25%
2. the probability of picking a correct answer is 25% -> there is one correct answer
3. A is correct -> there are two correct answers
4. A is not correct
5. D is correct -> the probability of picking a correct answer is 25%
6. the probability of picking a correct answer is 25% -> there is one correct answer
7. D is correct -> there are two correct answers
8. D is not correct
9. B is correct -> the probability of picking a correct answer is 50%
10. the probability of picking a correct answer is 50% -> there are two correct answers
11. B is correct -> there is one correct answer
12. B is not correct
13. C is correct -> the probability of picking a correct answer is 0%
14. the probability of picking a correct answer is 0% -> there are no correct answers
15. C is correct -> there is one correct answer
16. C is not correct
17. There are no correct answers
18. There are no correct answers -> the probability of picking a correct answer is 0%
19. the probability of picking a correct answer is 0% -> C is correct
20. C is correct OR Illya is my cute and lovely daughter
21. Illya is my cute and lovely daughter
Quod erat demonstrandum
>>62245724
75% isn't up there. That would make it c: 0% since you can't randomly get it. But c is up there making it 25%.
>>62245707
>25% - your chance at selecting this randomly is 50% 25/=50
Doesnt work
>50% chance of selecting is 25%
Doesnt work
>0. If zero was a correct ansver the chance would be 25
0/=25
This is an intentionally incorrect RECURSIVELY WRONG question.
It literally doesnt compute.
>>62245758
illya isnt ure daughter she is my gf
>>62245862
umm no shes my gf
>>62245868
no
>>62245862
>>62245868
>>62245890
that's the thing about sluts
she's everybody's gf
oh hey your father in law is back
>>62245200
A third
>>62245890
yes
>>62245896
delet this right now
>>62245200
I will rape you.
>>62245225
lol
>>62245602
Because his post did not mention he is a girl.
>>62245302
yes
>>62245953
wtf
>>62245200
b. 50%
the correct answer to the question is 25% as 1 out of 4 would be right if it was selected at random, seeing as two of the answers are 25% then you have a 50% chance of being correct.
>>62245200
50%. You are either correct or not.
>>62245302
it's 50% if we assume it as meeting dinosaur on the street question
but it's 0% because there is no question asked
>>62245200
Nice technology thread right here
>>62245200
it's 50%, you either get it right or you don't.