>he listens to ***lossless*** music

File: a9ef33a3043c38f07c5242ce62d94118.jpg (3MB, 4134x2945px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4134x2945px

*she

>>62241675
*xe

>>62241675
*she (male)

>>62241675
me on the left taking a selfie

>>62241589
excuse me did you just assume my gender?

>>62241675
>>62241742
kys yourselves feminized cucks

>>62241675
>>62241742
me on the right giving the kissu without the pantsu

>>62241589
Why must people care about what audio formats other people use?

i listen to mp3s of stone sour and sing along with full effort

>>62241589
>grown men watching anime, let alone moe

>>62242915
anime website

>>62242920
doesn't make it any less cringeworthy.

File: 10720ff.jpg (15KB, 326x262px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 326x262px

>>62241589
>listening to a digital medium
C
U
C
K

Those headphones look like something from AKG

File: 1504485553788.gif (19KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 400x400px

>>62242920
frog website

>>62242990
>needing to carry around big honking cd folders

>>62243014
>he thinks CD is analogue
I was just memeing, but please, you're stupidity is too much for /g/.

>>62243014
>leaving his house ever

>>62243032
youth these days
they have no idea

>>62243003
>mfw pepe is mainstream now
fuck /pol/

>>62243032
ok
>carrying around chests of records all the time
>even finding most music on vinyl

>>62243072
>he thinks only vinyls are analog
See >>62243049
Also >>62243035

>>62243056
>it's /pol/'s fault
>it's a /pol/ website now
>let's meme /pol/ everywhere
>pepe the frog is a /pol/ hate symbol
Fuck off.

>>62241589
>over 21
>expecting to have golden ears

>>62243056
Le pol boogeyman

>>62243079
>carrying around cases of cassette tapes

locally stored digital is the only way to fly

>>62241589
>watches anime
>listens to music at 256kbps

You're probably like one of those people I saw at my university who would always watch anime in the library, smell 'off', wear dark (yet somehow noticeably stained) clothes and always have study books next to them that never got opened. There was one just like that, saw him every so often for around two years and never heard him speak once.

File: 1503095922331.jpg (32KB, 880x496px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 880x496px

>>62242963
You just jelly

>>62242963
Posting on 4chan is cringe worthy enough to overshadow all anime watching.

>>62241589
Well, as i listen mostly to spc/nsf/gsf/psf/vgz/xm/mod/sid etc.., the end result is that i listen to mostly lossless music.

>>62242836
Slut

>>62241675
owo

>>62244326
hey don't talk about her like that

>>62241589
I hope she is using an amp with those headphones.

>>62243072
>Even finding most music on vinyl
99% of music worth hearing is on vinyl. Everything good since 2010 and before 1990 was pressed on vinyl, and the years between are basically a write off anyways.

File: 3fcdbe18ad792467581d65bf4e16efeb.png (93KB, 737x592px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 737x592px

>>62241589
Alright, here's the deal: it's almost the end of 2017 and I've been using strictly only wireless Bluetooth headphones for the couple last years, simply out of principle and to gather all the needed first-hand experience on this entire "wired VS wireless" debacle. So, after using strictly only wireless headphones on a daily basis for almost two-and-a-half years, I can definitely without any doubt openly state that the "always wired only" and "only highly expensive portable players/no smartphone pleb-tier" pseudo-audiophilic FAGGOTS are completely and absolutely FULL OF SHIT. I won't argue with anyone here that wireless headphones in general and wireless sound technologies in overall were utter garbage just 5-or-so years ago, but nowadays it's NOWHERE even remotely close to being as bad as it was in 2012 and further down the line. Everything (literally EVERY THING) these so-called self-proclaimed pseudo-audiophilic kiddie shithead trolls are openly and absolutely brainlessly proclaiming loudly everywhere about MODERN wireless sound technologies being any "bad" or "not on par with wired" is 100% COMPLETE BULLSHIT. Abso-effing-lute LIE. These retarded deaf kiddies clearly never used any modern wireless headphones that cost more than 50$ (and actually good/worthwhile wireless headphones start from the 120$ mark AT THE VERY LEAST) and/or they never tried Apt-X LL or ESPECIALLY the GODLIKE LDAC. These FAGS basically don't know jack about any of this, but they act like they're the hottest and most knowledgeable shits around the block while in reality they're not hot, but just shit. MODERN wireless sound IS actually VERY good and does NOT lose to wired at all by the sheer quality of sound and latency (if it's apt-X LL or LDAC), WHILE being WAAAY more convenient and comfortable to use due to headphones being completely (WELL, DUH!) wireless. Fuck all those pseudo-audiophilic pseudo-elitistic sudo-entitled "pro-wired" scrubshits, I say. They know fucking NOTHING.

>>62241589
>he posts pedo pictures and proud of it

File: 1496338626035.jpg (55KB, 808x755px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 808x755px

>What ~50$ range wireless headphones would /g/ recommend?
Unfortunately, there are almost no actually decent/good models in that price range. The closest one you can get to be of a "somewhat decent sound quality" is Rombica's "MySound BH-10 2C" model, but they have extremely crappy Bluetooth range and they usually tend to bug out and turn off even if slightest electromagnetic interference is nearby (like, for example, when you're in a convenience store and standing near a commercial fridge). Also note that they are literally "Chinkshit Wireless"-tier of headphones. If you never ever had a pair of wireless Bluetooth headphones before and you wish to get ACTUALLY worthwhile device from the first attempt - you'd have to spend AT LEAST 120$ and these will be MEElectronics' "Air-Fi Matrix 3" model and NO OTHER. This is the EXACT very point where actual wireless GOOD quality starts.

>Have they also opened it up for non-Sony headphones or do I need a Sony wireless?
That we don't know yet, as there are simply no massive amount of Android 8-based smartphones on the market so far, but I personally highly doubt that this will be Sony-only when it becomes mainstream, simply due to default LDAC implementation in all Android 8 devices making no logical sense in the case if Sony decides to not license this to other wireless headphone manufacturers. They've already licensed this to Android 8, so why the hell will they restrict it only to their wireless headphones now? That will be an asshole move and will undoubtedly garner a lot of critique on Sony's ass. I don't think that Sony's THAT stupid as to not provide other wireless headphone manufacturers with a LDAC license. And even if (and that's a very big IF) they actually in all seriousness restrict LDAC usage only to their wireless devices, this still at least leaves us an option to not use a Sony smartphone for it if we wouldn't want to, so there's at least that.

File: 20170902_195001.jpg (3MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x1836px

>He listens to music outside of Classical music concerts

I didn't know /g/ was so uncultured.

File: SHA.png (10KB, 880x880px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 880x880px

>Name one worthwhile wireless headphone that isn't shit-tier or overpriced for what it sounds
Plantronics BackBeat Pro 2 SE (monitor, closed, neutral, medium price)
MEElectronics AirFi Matrix 3 (monitor, half-open, neutral-to-bright, price-wise this very start of the actual good quality in wireless headphones so this is as low as you should go if you're planning on using LDAC/Apt-X LL)
Marshall Monitor Bluetooth (monitor, closed, V-shape, medium price)
Master & Dynamic MW60 (monitor, closed, V-shape, high price yet not ineptly overpriced)
Bang & Olufsen H9 (monitor, closed, neutral, medium price)
Sony MDR-1000X (monitor, closed, warm-to-neutral, mid-to-high price, best ANC)
Onkyo W800BT (IEM, closed, neutral, medium price)
JVC HA-S90BN (monitor, closed, V-shape, medium price)

All of these currently available headphones are absolutely worthwhile wireless solutions. The most expensive one in that list is Master & Dynamic MW60 and even it is not really overpriced (usually sells for 600$, but can be found for as cheap as ~420$ at some places during sale-off days).

P.S.
Answering the question that was made in the previous thread: "open" structure is not actually common in the wireless segment, at least when it comes down to monitor headphones, but if anything - you could always try MEElectronics' AirFi Matrix 3, they're partially open. Also please don't ever lump "closed" design and "bad" together all the time, because this is simply not true. All of the closed monitor headphones mentioned above are absolutely top-notch pieces of hardware and sound very good for their respective pricing segments (Master & Dynamic MW60 having the best materials and sounding phenomenally even in artificially created bad conditions, but it's sound curve, which is very clearly V-shaped, is definitely not necessarily for everyone. I personally prefer absolutely neutral sound, so my personal wireless headphones of choice for everyday usage are Plantronics BackBeat PRO 2 SE and Onkyo W800BT).

>>62245477
> if it's apt-X LL or LDAC
It will probably cost much more than my $30 Sennheisers. I'm not willing to pay extra for the sake of the "new technology".

>>62245491
By your definition every teacher is a pedo.

>>62245799
>He uses a ~30$ product
>It's Sennheiser
MUD and NIGGERBASS, MUD and NIGGERBASS EVERYWHERE (and also instant snapping)

File: 1486699408083.gif (4MB, 256x188px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 256x188px

>>62245799
>It will probably cost much more than my
Get a fucking job already. ANY job, you lazy wirecuck.

File: 1504347038536.jpg (44KB, 590x500px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 590x500px

I listen to all of my music streamed from Google Play Music.
I used to listen to flac albums I downloaded off the internet some year ago but the convenience of a streaming service like this or Spotify is much worth the negligible "gains" of lossless audio quality in my opinion.

File: 14793111388410.jpg (18KB, 308x400px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 308x400px

>>62245884
>I listen to all of my music streamed
>from Google Play
KYS. onegai.

>>62245941
Are you mad at me for streaming, or streaming from Google Play?
I don't like Spotify.

>>62245987
Both.
Not having music physically present on your device is moronic.
Using liberastic spying malware Google Play just to listen to music - imbecilic.
Smart people listen to music offline and own it on their devices.

>>62246038
Smart people know that you can upload your own music to GPM, retard

>>62246176
Autism = the post