what the fuck is their problem?

>>62240458
that is what happens when you let cucks run the show.
inconsistency.

>>62240807
Are you implying that Lisp is a common SJW scheme? Who would have the guile to cause such a racket?

File: brainlet.png (11KB, 183x218px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 183x218px

Name one (1) thing wrong with common lisp
>pic related its OP

File: Clisp_snapshot.jpg (76KB, 909x617px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 909x617px

>>62241479
(((clisp)))

>>62241564
>not using SBCL or CCL
dropped

>>62241240
yes, look at the history of lisp. they refuse to define it and decided that leaving cucks create their own branch of lisp would be a good idea.
then came common lisp to "accept them all" by bundling every lisp in one standard.
such is the power of multilanguagerism.

>>62241579
Not a screenshot of my machine. I prefer scheme, thanks to SICP

>>62240458
autism

>>62241634
I don't see the problem; just use scheme if that is what you care about.

>>62241682
came here to post this. upvoted

>>62241634
yeah lisp is so bad every language rips ideas off of it and touts it as an amazing new feature

>>62241691
>>62241704
technology works best when its adopted, while other languages weren't original, they did get adopted.
see javascript. its a disaster but everyone simply accepts it as the go to language for setting behaviour on a page. lisp? everyone still debates which branch is better while nobody uses any of it. great for testing new ideas, horrible for wide adoption.

>>62240458
Invented in the 1950s half of the stuff brainlets are calling "new", "revolutionary" and "modern".

>>62240458
((their)) problem is that they need a new set of 9 and 0 keys.

>>62242121
And a new λ key.